Light-matter dynamics in topological quantum materials enables ultralow-power, ultrafast devices. A challenge is simulating multiple field and particle equations for light, electrons, and atoms over vast spatiotemporal scales on Exaflop/s computers with increased heterogeneity and low-precision focus. We present a paradigm shift that solves the multiscale/multiphysics/heterogeneity challenge harnessing hardware heterogeneity and low-precision arithmetic. Divide-conquer-recombine algorithms divide the problem into not only spatial but also physical subproblems of small dynamic ranges and minimal mutual information, which are mapped onto best-characteristics-matching hardware units, while metamodel-space algebra minimizes communication and precision requirements. Using 60,000 GPUs of Aurora, DC-MESH (divide-and-conquer Maxwell-Ehrenfest-surface hopping) and XS-NNQMD (excited-state neural-network quantum molecular dynamics) modules of MLMD (multiscale light-matter dynamics) software were 152- and 3,780-times faster than the state-of-the-art for 15.4 million-electron and 1.23 trillion-atom PbTiO3 material, achieving 1.87 EFLOP/s for the former. This enabled the first study of light-induced switching of topological superlattices for future ferroelectric ‘topotronics’.

We analyse gather-scatter performance bottlenecks in molecular dynamics codes and the challenges that they pose for obtaining benefits from SIMD execution. This analysis informs a number of novel code-level and algorithmic improvements to Sandia's miniMD benchmark, which we demonstrate using three SIMD widths (128-, 256and 512bit). The applicability of these optimisations to wider SIMD is discussed, and we show that the conventional approach of exposing more parallelism through redundant computation is not necessarily best. In single precision, our optimised implementation is up to 5x faster than the original scalar code running on Intel®Xeon®processors with 256-bit SIMD, and adding a single Intel®Xeon Phi™coprocessor provides up to an additional 2x performance increase. These results demonstrate: (i) the importance of effective SIMD utilisation for molecular dynamics codes on current and future hardware; and (ii) the considerable performance increase afforded by the use of Intel®Xeon Phi™coprocessors for highly parallel workloads.

Input/Output (I/O) operations can represent a significant proportion of the run-time of parallel scientific computing applications. Although there have been several advances in file format libraries, file system design and I/O hardware, a growing divergence exists between the performance of parallel file systems and the compute clusters that they support. In this paper, we document the design and application of the RIOT I/O toolkit (RIOT) being developed at the University of Warwick with our industrial partners at the Atomic Weapons Establishment and Sandia National Laboratories. We use the toolkit to assess the performance of three industry-standard I/O benchmarks on three contrasting supercomputers, ranging from a mid-sized commodity cluster to a large-scale proprietary IBM BlueGene/P system. RIOT provides a powerful framework in which to analyse I/O and parallel file system behaviour—we demonstrate, for example, the large file locking overhead of IBM's General Parallel File System, which can consume nearly 30% of the total write time in the FLASH-IO benchmark. Through I/O trace analysis, we also assess the performance of HDF-5 in its default configuration, identifying a bottleneck created by the use of suboptimal Message Passing Interface hints. Furthermore, we investigate the performance gains attributed to the Parallel Log-structured File System (PLFS) being developed by EMC Corporation and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Our evaluation of PLFS involves two high-performance computing systems with contrasting I/O backplanes and illustrates the varied improvements to I/O that result from the deployment of PLFS (ranging from up to 25× speed-up in I/O performance on a large I/O installation to 2× speed-up on the much smaller installation at the University of Warwick).

In this paper we investigate the use of distributed graphics processing unit (GPU)-based architectures to accelerate pipelined wavefront applications—a ubiquitous class of parallel algorithms used for the solution of a number of scientific and engineering applications. Specifically, we employ a recently developed port of the LU solver (from the NAS Parallel Benchmark suite) to investigate the performance of these algorithms on high-performance computing solutions from NVIDIA (Tesla C1060 and C2050) as well as on traditional clusters (AMD/InfiniBand and IBM BlueGene/P). Benchmark results are presented for problem classes A to C and a recently developed performance model is used to provide projections for problem classes D and E, the latter of which represents a billion-cell problem. Our results demonstrate that while the theoretical performance of GPU solutions will far exceed those of many traditional technologies, the sustained application performance is currently comparable for scientific wavefront applications. Finally, a breakdown of the GPU solution is conducted, exposing PCIe overheads and decomposition constraints. A new k-blocking strategy is proposed to improve the future performance of this class of algorithm on GPU-based architectures.