Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard R. Adams
dblp:97/1305
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0003-1501-0941ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 50% Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology · Bioinform. 2013 |
Distributed systems › middleware
distributed computing middleware |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology · Bioinform. 2013 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biology · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
disease gene prioritization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | SUSPECTS: enabling fast and effective prioritization of positional candidates · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | SUSPECTS: enabling fast and effective prioritization of positional candidates · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
plugin architecture · 0.3parallel optimization algorithms · 0.3XML validation · 0.1SED-ML · 0.1sequence-based prioritization · 0.1annotation-based prioritization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | COMBINE archive and OMEX format: one file to share all information to reproduce a modeling projectabstractBACKGROUND: With the ever increasing use of computational models in the biosciences, the need to share models and reproduce the results of published studies efficiently and easily is becoming more important. To this end, various standards have been proposed that can be used to describe models, simulations, data or other essential information in a consistent fashion. These constitute various separate components required to reproduce a given published scientific result. RESULTS: We describe the Open Modeling EXchange format (OMEX). Together with the use of other standard formats from the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE), OMEX is the basis of the COMBINE Archive, a single file that supports the exchange of all the information necessary for a modeling and simulation experiment in biology. An OMEX file is a ZIP container that includes a manifest file, listing the content of the archive, an optional metadata file adding information about the archive and its content, and the files describing the model. The content of a COMBINE Archive consists of files encoded in COMBINE standards whenever possible, but may include additional files defined by an Internet Media Type. Several tools that support the COMBINE Archive are available, either as independent libraries or embedded in modeling software. CONCLUSIONS: The COMBINE Archive facilitates the reproduction of modeling and simulation experiments in biology by embedding all the relevant information in one file. Having all the information stored and exchanged at once also helps in building activity logs and audit trails. We anticipate that the COMBINE Archive will become a significant help for modellers, as the domain moves to larger, more complex experiments such as multi-scale models of organs, digital organisms, and bioengineering. Frank T. Bergmann, Richard R. Adams, Stuart L. Moodie, Jonathan Cooper, Mihai Glont, Martin Golebiewski, Michael Hucka, Camille Laibe, Andrew K. Miller, David P. Nickerson, Brett G. Olivier, Nicolas Rodriguez 0001, Herbert M. Sauro, Martin Scharm, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Dagmar Waltemath, Florent Yvon, Nicolas Le Novère |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | SBSI: an extensible distributed software infrastructure for parameter estimation in systems biologyabstractSUMMARY: Complex computational experiments in Systems Biology, such as fitting model parameters to experimental data, can be challenging to perform. Not only do they frequently require a high level of computational power, but the software needed to run the experiment needs to be usable by scientists with varying levels of computational expertise, and modellers need to be able to obtain up-to-date experimental data resources easily. We have developed a software suite, the Systems Biology Software Infrastructure (SBSI), to facilitate the parameter-fitting process. SBSI is a modular software suite composed of three major components: SBSINumerics, a high-performance library containing parallelized algorithms for performing parameter fitting; SBSIDispatcher, a middleware application to track experiments and submit jobs to back-end servers; and SBSIVisual, an extensible client application used to configure optimization experiments and view results. Furthermore, we have created a plugin infrastructure to enable project-specific modules to be easily installed. Plugin developers can take advantage of the existing user-interface and application framework to customize SBSI for their own uses, facilitated by SBSI's use of standard data formats. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All SBSI binaries and source-code are freely available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbsi under an Apache 2 open-source license. The server-side SBSINumerics runs on any Unix-based operating system; both SBSIVisual and SBSIDispatcher are written in Java and are platform independent, allowing use on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X. The SBSI project website at http://www.sbsi.ed.ac.uk provides documentation and tutorials. Richard R. Adams, Allan B. Clark, Azusa Yamaguchi, Neil Hanlon, Nikos Tsorman, Shakir Ali, Galina Lebedeva, Alexey N. Goltsov, Anatoly A. Sorokin, Ozgur E. Akman, Carl Troein, Andrew J. Millar, Igor Goryanin, Stephen Gilmore |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2012 | SED-ED, a workflow editor for computational biology experiments written in SED-MLabstractUNLABELLED: The simulation experiment description markup language (SED-ML) is a new community data standard to encode computational biology experiments in a computer-readable XML format. Its widespread adoption will require the development of software support to work with SED-ML files. Here, we describe a software tool, SED-ED, to view, edit, validate and annotate SED-ML documents while shielding end-users from the underlying XML representation. SED-ED supports modellers who wish to create, understand and further develop a simulation description provided in SED-ML format. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SED-ED is available as a standalone Java application, as an Eclipse plug-in and as an SBSI (www.sbsi.ed.ac.uk) plug-in, all under an MIT open-source license. Source code is at https://sed-ed-sedmleditor.googlecode.com/svn. The application itself is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/jlibsedml/files/SED-ED/. Richard R. Adams |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE)abstractThis FAIRsharing record describes: The MIASE Guidelines, initiated by the BioModels.net effort, are a community effort to identify the Minimal Information About a Simulation Experiment, necessary to enable the reproducible simulation experiments. Consequently, the MIASE Guidelines list the information that a modeller needs to provide to enable the execution and reproduction of a numerical simulation experiment, derived from a given set of quantitative models. MIASE is a set of guidelines suitable for use with any structured format for simulation experiments. As such, MIASE is designed to help modelers and software tools to exchange their simulation settings and to foster collaboration. Dagmar Waltemath, Richard R. Adams, Daniel A. Beard, Frank T. Bergmann, Upinder S. Bhalla, Randall Britten, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Mike T. Cooling, Jonathan Cooper, Edmund J. Crampin, Alan Garny, Stefan Hoops, Michael Hucka, Peter J. Hunter, Edda Klipp, Camille Laibe, Andrew K. Miller, Ion I. Moraru, David P. Nickerson, Poul M. F. Nielsen, Macha Nikolski, Sven Sahle, Herbert M. Sauro, Henning Schmidt, Jacky L. Snoep, Dominic P. Tolle, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Nicolas Le Novère |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2006 | SUSPECTS: enabling fast and effective prioritization of positional candidatesabstractUNLABELLED: SUSPECTS is a web-based server which combines annotation and sequence-based approaches to prioritize disease candidate genes in large regions of interest. It uses multiple lines of evidence to rank genes quickly and effectively while limiting the effect of annotation bias to significantly improve performance. AVAILABILITY: SUSPECTS is freely available at http://www.genetics.med.ed.ac.uk/suspects/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A quick-start guide in Macromedia Flash format is available at http://www.genetics.med.ed.ac.uk/suspects/help.shtml and Excel spreadsheets detailing the comparative performance of the software are included as Supplementary material. Euan A. Adie, Richard R. Adams, Kathryn L. Evans, David J. Porteous, Ben S. Pickard |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2005 | Speeding disease gene discovery by sequence based candidate prioritizationabstractBACKGROUND: Regions of interest identified through genetic linkage studies regularly exceed 30 centimorgans in size and can contain hundreds of genes. Traditionally this number is reduced by matching functional annotation to knowledge of the disease or phenotype in question. However, here we show that disease genes share patterns of sequence-based features that can provide a good basis for automatic prioritization of candidates by machine learning. RESULTS: We examined a variety of sequence-based features and found that for many of them there are significant differences between the sets of genes known to be involved in human hereditary disease and those not known to be involved in disease. We have created an automatic classifier called PROSPECTR based on those features using the alternating decision tree algorithm which ranks genes in the order of likelihood of involvement in disease. On average, PROSPECTR enriches lists for disease genes two-fold 77% of the time, five-fold 37% of the time and twenty-fold 11% of the time. CONCLUSION: PROSPECTR is a simple and effective way to identify genes involved in Mendelian and oligogenic disorders. It performs markedly better than the single existing sequence-based classifier on novel data. PROSPECTR could save investigators looking at large regions of interest time and effort by prioritizing positional candidate genes for mutation detection and case-control association studies. Euan A. Adie, Richard R. Adams, Kathryn L. Evans, David J. Porteous, Ben S. Pickard |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |