Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karl Kunisch

dblp:97/1320 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-1113-7355ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 57% Optimization for machine learning · 43%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
hamilton-jacobi-bellman equation
1.222023
Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Optimal Feedback Law Recovery by Gradient-Augmented Sparse Polynomial Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control
1.222023
Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Optimal Feedback Law Recovery by Gradient-Augmented Sparse Polynomial Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Image and video processing › regularization
variational regularization
1.022022
Total Deep Variation: A Stable Regularization Method for Inverse Problems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problems · CVPR 2020
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
feedback policy
0.712023
Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › approximation theory
polynomial approximation
0.712023
Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparse approximation
0.712023
Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem
0.612022
Total Deep Variation: A Stable Regularization Method for Inverse Problems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression
0.512021
Optimal Feedback Law Recovery by Gradient-Augmented Sparse Polynomial Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.412020
Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problems · CVPR 2020
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.412020
Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problems · CVPR 2020
Image and video processing › image reconstruction
medical image reconstruction
0.412020
Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problems · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.212022
Total Deep Variation: A Stable Regularization Method for Inverse Problems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

total deep variation · 2.0optimal control · 2.0mean-field analysis · 1.1nonlinear eigenfunction analysis · 0.9adjoint state equations · 0.9proximal point method · 0.7l1 penalty · 0.7graph-theoretic algorithms · 0.7pontryagin's maximum principle · 0.5lasso · 0.5hyperbolic cross polynomials · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning Optimal Feedback Operators and their Sparse Polynomial Approximations
abstract
A learning based method for obtaining feedback laws for nonlinear optimal control problems is proposed. The learning problem is posed such that the open loop value function is its optimal solution. This infinite dimensional, function space, problem, is approximated by a polynomial ansatz and its convergence is analyzed. An $\ell_1$ penalty term is employed, which combined with the proximal point method, allows to find sparse solutions for the learning problem. The approach requires multiple evaluations of the elements of the polynomial basis and of their derivatives. In order to do this efficiently a graph-theoretic algorithm is devised. Several examples underline that the proposed methodology provides a promising approach for mitigating the curse of dimensionality which would be involved in case the optimal feedback law was obtained by solving the Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equation.
Karl Kunisch, Donato Vásquez-Varas, Daniel Walter
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2022 Total Deep Variation: A Stable Regularization Method for Inverse Problems
abstract
Various problems in computer vision and medical imaging can be cast as inverse problems. A frequent method for solving inverse problems is the variational approach, which amounts to minimizing an energy composed of a data fidelity term and a regularizer. Classically, handcrafted regularizers are used, which are commonly outperformed by state-of-the-art deep learning approaches. In this work, we combine the variational formulation of inverse problems with deep learning by introducing the data-driven general-purpose total deep variation regularizer. In its core, a convolutional neural network extracts local features on multiple scales and in successive blocks. This combination allows for a rigorous mathematical analysis including an optimal control formulation of the training problem in a mean-field setting and a stability analysis with respect to the initial values and the parameters of the regularizer. In addition, we experimentally verify the robustness against adversarial attacks and numerically derive upper bounds for the generalization error. Finally, we achieve state-of-the-art results for several imaging tasks.
Erich Kobler, Alexander Effland, Karl Kunisch, Thomas Pock
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2021 Optimal Feedback Law Recovery by Gradient-Augmented Sparse Polynomial Regression
abstract
A sparse regression approach for the computation of high-dimensional optimal feedback laws arising in deterministic nonlinear control is proposed. The approach exploits the control-theoretical link between Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs characterizing the value function of the optimal control problems, and first-order optimality conditions via Pontryagin's Maximum Principle. The latter is used as a representation formula to recover the value function and its gradient at arbitrary points in the space-time domain through the solution of a two-point boundary value problem. After generating a dataset consisting of different state-value pairs, a hyperbolic cross polynomial model for the value function is fitted using a LASSO regression. An extended set of low and high-dimensional numerical tests in nonlinear optimal control reveal that enriching the dataset with gradient information reduces the number of training samples, and that the sparse polynomial regression consistently yields a feedback law of lower complexity.
Behzad Azmi, Dante Kalise, Karl Kunisch
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse Problems
abstract
Diverse inverse problems in imaging can be cast as variational problems composed of a task-specific data fidelity term and a regularization term. In this paper, we propose a novel learnable general-purpose regularizer exploiting recent architectural design patterns from deep learning. We cast the learning problem as a discrete sampled optimal control problem, for which we derive the adjoint state equations and an optimality condition. By exploiting the variational structure of our approach, we perform a sensitivity analysis with respect to the learned parameters obtained from different training datasets. Moreover, we carry out a nonlinear eigenfunction analysis, which reveals interesting properties of the learned regularizer. We show state-of-the-art performance for classical image restoration and medical image reconstruction problems.
Erich Kobler, Alexander Effland, Karl Kunisch, Thomas Pock
CVPR3
2018 Magnetic Resonance RF Pulse Design by Optimal Control With Physical Constraints
abstract
Optimal control approaches have proved useful in designing RF pulses for large tip-angle applications. A typical challenge for optimal control design is the inclusion of constraints resulting from physiological or technical limitations that assure the realizability of the optimized pulses. In this paper, we show how to treat such inequality constraints, in particular, amplitude constraints on the B1 field, the slice-selective gradient, and its slew rate, as well as constraints on the slice profile accuracy. For the latter, a pointwise profile error and additional phase constraints are prescribed. Here, a penalization method is introduced that corresponds to a higher order tracking instead of the common quadratic tracking. The order is driven to infinity in the course of the optimization. We jointly optimize for the RF and slice-selective gradient waveform. The amplitude constraints on these control variables are treated efficiently by semismooth Newton or quasi-Newton methods. The method is flexible, adapting to many optimization goals. As an application, we reduce the power of refocusing pulses, which is important for spin echo-based applications with a short echo spacing. Here, the optimization method is tested in numerical experiments for reducing the pulse power of simultaneous multislice refocusing pulses. The results are validated by phantom and in-vivo experiments.
Armin Rund, Christoph S. Aigner, Karl Kunisch, Rudolf Stollberger
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3
2014 On Infimal Convolution of TV-Type Functionals and Applications to Video and Image Reconstruction
abstract
The infimal convolution of total (generalized) variation--type functionals and its application as regularization for video and image reconstruction is considered. The definition of this particular type of regularization functional is motivated by the need of suitably combining spatial and temporal regularity requirements for video processing. The proposed functional is defined in an infinite dimensional setting, and important analytical properties are established. As applications, the reconstruction of compressed video data and of noisy still images is considered. The resulting problem settings are posed in function space, and suitable numerical solution schemes are established. Experiments confirm a significant improvement compared to standard total variation--type methods, which originates from the introduction of spatio-temporal and spatial anisotropies.
Martin Holler, Karl Kunisch
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2
2013 A Bilevel Optimization Approach for Parameter Learning in Variational Models
abstract
In this work we consider the problem of parameter learning for variational image denoising models. The learning problem is formulated as a bilevel optimization problem, where the lower-level problem is given by the variational model and the higher-level problem is expressed by means of a loss function that penalizes errors between the solution of the lower-level problem and the ground truth data. We consider a class of image denoising models incorporating $\ell_p$-norm--based analysis priors using a fixed set of linear operators. We devise semismooth Newton methods for solving the resulting nonsmooth bilevel optimization problems and show that the optimized image denoising models can achieve state-of-the-art performance.
Karl Kunisch, Thomas Pock
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.1
2010 Total Generalized Variation
abstract
The novel concept of total generalized variation of a function u is introduced, and some of its essential properties are proved. Differently from the bounded variation seminorm, the new concept involves higher-order derivatives of u. Numerical examples illustrate the high quality of this functional as a regularization term for mathematical imaging problems. In particular this functional selectively regularizes on different regularity levels and, as a side effect, does not lead to a staircasing effect.
Kristian Bredies, Karl Kunisch, Thomas Pock
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2
2010 A Semismooth Newton Method for L1 Data Fitting with Automatic Choice of Regularization Parameters and Noise Calibration
abstract
This paper considers the numerical solution of inverse problems with an $\mathrm{L}^1$ data fitting term, which is challenging due to the lack of differentiability of the objective functional. Utilizing convex duality, the problem is reformulated as minimizing a smooth functional with pointwise constraints, which can be efficiently solved using a semismooth Newton method. In order to achieve superlinear convergence, the dual problem requires additional regularization. For both the primal and the dual problems, the choice of the regularization parameters is crucial. We propose adaptive strategies for choosing these parameters. The regularization parameter in the primal formulation is chosen according to a balancing principle derived from the model function approach, whereas the one in the dual formulation is determined by a path-following strategy based on the structure of the optimality conditions. Several numerical experiments confirm the efficiency and robustness of the proposed method and adaptive strategy.
Christian Clason, Bangti Jin, Karl Kunisch
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.3