Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephen A. Szygenda

dblp:97/1322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 9 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
7 papers
Electronic design automation · 89% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 6% Integrated circuit design · 3%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.041995
Massively Parallel Array Processor for Logic, Fault, and Design Error Simulation · HPCA 1995
MixMOS: a mixed-level simulator for digital MOS circuits using a new algebraic approach · Comput. Aided Des. 1990
Detection of static and dynamic hazards in logic nets · DAC 1977
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation
0.031995
Massively Parallel Array Processor for Logic, Fault, and Design Error Simulation · HPCA 1995
Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems · DAC 1975
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
logic simulation
0.021995
Massively Parallel Array Processor for Logic, Fault, and Design Error Simulation · HPCA 1995
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
multilevel simulation
0.011990
MixMOS: a mixed-level simulator for digital MOS circuits using a new algebraic approach · Comput. Aided Des. 1990
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › scientific computing accelerator
simulation accelerator
0.011995
Massively Parallel Array Processor for Logic, Fault, and Design Error Simulation · HPCA 1995
Integrated circuit design › VLSI design
MOS VLSI circuits
0.011990
MixMOS: a mixed-level simulator for digital MOS circuits using a new algebraic approach · Comput. Aided Des. 1990
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011976
Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011976
A Data Structure and Drive Mechanism for a Table-Driven Simulation System Employing Multilevel Structural Representations of Digital Systems · ICSE 1976
Electronic design automation › hardware simulation
digital simulation
0.011975
Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems · DAC 1975
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault diagnosis
diagnosable systems
0.011973
Deriving Design Guidelines for Diagnosable Computer Systems · ISCA 1973
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault diagnosis
0.011973
Deriving Design Guidelines for Diagnosable Computer Systems · ISCA 1973
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
digital system simulation
0.011976
A Data Structure and Drive Mechanism for a Table-Driven Simulation System Employing Multilevel Structural Representations of Digital Systems · ICSE 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel array processing · 0.0algebraic approach · 0.0timing analysis · 0.0static and dynamic hazard analysis · 0.0register transfer simulation · 0.0digital simulation · 0.0design guidelines · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Multiresolution BSP Trees Applied to Terrain, Transparency, and General Objects
Charles Wiley, A. T. Campbell III, Stephen A. Szygenda, Donald S. Fussell, Fred Hudson
Graphics Interface3
1995 Massively Parallel Array Processor for Logic, Fault, and Design Error Simulation
abstract
Digital logic, fault, and error simulation of large VLSI circuits is one of the most compute-intensive tasks in digital systems analysis. This paper describes a massively parallel special purpose array processor, or hardware accelerator, for digital logic, fault, and error simulation. Hardware simulation is a viable approach for simulation of large systems, since simulation time increases rapidly as a function of the size and complexity of the systems to be simulated. In order to reduce the cost and to achieve high performance, a massively parallel array processor and new algorithms have been introduced. By executing an efficient and direct model of the design on the PE array, the architecture can provide high performance, similar to prototyping. Simulation results show that the hardware accelerator is orders of magnitude faster than software simulation.>
Youngmin Hur, Stephen A. Szygenda, E. Scott Fehr, Granville E. Ott, Sungho Kang 0001
HPCA2
1995 Statistics on concurrent fault and design error simulation
abstract
Basic data of the nature presented here on fault and design error simulation processes have not been previously reported. Experiments are performed on c-sim, a gate level concurrent simulator developed at the University of Texas at Austin. Three types of statistics are considered: event based statistics, gate evaluation statistics and memory requirements. These statistics are important for design verification researchers and engineers for numerous reasons. For example, they help simulator developers tune up or optimize their concurrent simulators. They also fulfill the increasing need for experimental data concerning design error simulation. Most importantly, these statistics provide guidance to hardware accelerator designers in evaluating and comparing various design options.
Brian Grayson, Saghir A. Shaikh, Stephen A. Szygenda
ICCD3
1994 The simulation automation system (SAS); concepts, implementation, and results
abstract
The simulation automation system (SAS) was developed to provide an efficient simulation environment, by automating the entire simulation process. This system can be classified, by its salient unique features, into: automatic model generator (AMG), automatic simulator developer (ASD), and design error simulation and test system (DEST). The system can automatically generate multivalued simulation models and automatically develop various simulators, using domain specific automatic programming techniques. The automatic model generation feature can be used when a new model library is built or when an existing library is upgraded. The automatic simulator development feature allows a user who may not be knowledgeable about simulators, to easily develop unique simulators, which can be used for special purposes or special designs. SAS can also verify designs using the Design Error Simulation and Test System. It provides a confidence measure of the verification, as well as simulation results. When users are not satisfied with the confidence level achieved after simulation, they can automatically generate additional simulation patterns for design errors in order to achieve a higher confidence level. Using this approach, design verification time and cost can be considerably reduced, and an actual measure of verification is provided. Consequently, the design cycle can be considerably reduced. This is especially significant for large, complex systems.>
Sungho Kang 0001, Stephen A. Szygenda
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst.2
1993 m3D: A Multidimensional Dynamic Configurable Router
Charles Wiley, K. M. Lau, Stephen A. Szygenda
ISCAS3
1992 Modeling and Simulation of Design Errors
abstract
When using simulation for design verification, only a subset of possible simulation patterns is used, since exhaustive simulation is usually not practical. When this subset is used, the designer wants to know how efficiently the design has been verified. The authors provide a measure of simulation pattern effectiveness, based on the concepts of design error modeling. This measure gives insight into the actual level of design validation that has been achieved. These concepts provide a basis for discussing a design validation metric.>
Sungho Kang 0001, Stephen A. Szygenda
ICCD2
1990 MixMOS: a mixed-level simulator for digital MOS circuits using a new algebraic approach
Jin-Hyeung Kong, Stephen A. Szygenda
Comput. Aided Des.2
1977 Detection of static and dynamic hazards in logic nets
Ajoy K. Bose, Stephen A. Szygenda
DAC2
1976 A Data Structure and Drive Mechanism for a Table-Driven Simulation System Employing Multilevel Structural Representations of Digital Systems
N. Billawala, Stephen A. Szygenda, Ewald W. Thomson
ICSE2
1976 Modeling and Digital Simulation for Design Verification and Diagnosis
abstract
There are many activities included under the category of design automation for integrated circuits. Some of these activities include packaging, placement, routing, interactive graphics, device data bases, and digital simulation; for the purpose of logic verification, timing analysis, and diagnostic test verification. One might also include high-level simulation, such as register transfer simulation, for the purpose of initial logic verification. This paper will be oriented towards modeling and implementation questions which arise when one is attempting to implement an extremely accurate digital simulator for the purposes of logic and design verification and fault simulation. Simulators for these purposes are now extremely important and occupy a major role in any design automation system. These systems are also very expensive and therefore the incorrect answers to a variety of questions which arise during the process of developing such simulators can be disastrous. This paper shall attempt to acquaint the reader with questions that have arisen over the years in terms of developing these simulators and what some of the possible answers are, and their respective tradeoffs. Although the successes, and, equally the failures, of many people have contributed to the present state of the art of digital simulators, one particular simulator, the one the authors are most intimately involved with, will be used as a source of detailed examples demonstrating many of the questions to be discussed.
Stephen A. Szygenda, Edward W. Thompson
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1975 Three levels of accuracy for the simulation of different fault types in digital systems
Edward W. Thompson, Stephen A. Szygenda
DAC2
1973 Deriving Design Guidelines for Diagnosable Computer Systems
abstract
Diagnosable computer systems are designed to detect and isolate the faults that occur during system operation. A number of techniques are available to the system designer of diagnosable systems. This paper examines a number of these techniques and derives a set of design guidelines incorporating them.
John M. Hemphill, Stephen A. Szygenda
ISCA2