Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

W. De Rammelaere

dblp:97/1701 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 91% Integrated circuit design · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
error diagnosis
0.011989
Electrical Debugging of Synchronous MOS VLSI Circuits Exploiting Analysis of the Intended Logic Behaviour · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011989
Electrical Debugging of Synchronous MOS VLSI Circuits Exploiting Analysis of the Intended Logic Behaviour · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › circuit analysis
switch-level analysis
0.011989
Electrical Debugging of Synchronous MOS VLSI Circuits Exploiting Analysis of the Intended Logic Behaviour · DAC 1989
Integrated circuit design › VLSI design
MOS VLSI circuits
0.011989
Electrical Debugging of Synchronous MOS VLSI Circuits Exploiting Analysis of the Intended Logic Behaviour · DAC 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic analysis · 0.0rule-based analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Derivation of signal flow direction in MOS VLSI: an alternative
abstract
Novel rules to derive the signal flow in a VLSI-design are presented. This method is based on design-style independent logical principles, which makes it suitable for circuits that have not been checked on their electrical correctness. The use of two global principles has an important influence for more complicated designs, but also results in an efficiency penalty which may be kept reasonable by introducing graph reduction rules and heuristics. The different steps in the tagging process are explained and illustrated with examples. The dataflow rules are integrated in the overall DIALOG system to perform electrical verification, and they offer an invaluable help to break up the verification problem in subproblems and to cope with feedback in designs, by introducing the concept of intended unilateral blocks.>
W. De Rammelaere, Ivo Bolsens, Luc Claesen, Hugo De Man
ICCD1
1989 Electrical Debugging of Synchronous MOS VLSI Circuits Exploiting Analysis of the Intended Logic Behaviour
abstract
This paper discusses the kernel implementation issues of a new and more formal approach to electrical verification. Rule based analysis of the transistor network is applied to derive the signal flow direction and to identify control and state nodes. Symbolic analysis of Boolean expressions, capturing all aspects of switch level networks, allows to take into account the logical structure of the network and its environment during verification and guarantees more relevant error reports. The application of the proposed strategy on real life examples, demonstrates its usefulness and allows for a realistic evaluation of the tool.
Ivo Bolsens, W. De Rammelaere, Luc Claesen, Hugo De Man
DAC2