Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Konrad Trifunovic

dblp:97/2072 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
dependence analysis
0.212013
Improved loop tiling based on the removal of spurious false dependences · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013
Compilers and program optimization › loop optimization
loop tiling
0.212013
Improved loop tiling based on the removal of spurious false dependences · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013
Compilers and program optimization
loop transformation
0.212013
Improved loop tiling based on the removal of spurious false dependences · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
automatic parallelization
0.012013
Improved loop tiling based on the removal of spurious false dependences · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polyhedral compilation · 0.3live range analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 IGC: The Open Source Intel Graphics Compiler
abstract
With increasing general purpose programming capability, GPUs have become the mainstay for a wide variety of compute intensive tasks from cloud to edge computing. Because of its availability on nearly every desktop and mobile processor that Intel ships, Intel integrated GPU offers a plethora of opportunities for researchers and application developers to make significant real-world impact. In this paper we present the Intel Graphics Compiler (IGC), the LLVM-based production compiler for Intel HD and Iris graphics. IGC supports all major graphics and compute APIs, and its OpenCL compute stack including compute runtime, compiler frontend and backend, and architecture specification is fully open-source, giving a unique opportunity for developers to optimize the entire stack. We highlight several custom optimizations that address the challenges for GPU compilation. Examples include SIMD size selection, divergence analysis, instruction scheduling, addressing mode selection, and redundant copy elimination. These optimizations take advantage of features in the Intel GPU architecture such as a larger register file, indirect register addressing, and multiple memory addressing modes. Experimental results show that our optimizations deliver significant speedup on a number of OpenCL benchmarks; compared to the baseline, we see a geometric mean of 12% speed up across benchmarks with a peak gain of 45%.
Anupama Chandrasekhar, Wei-Yu Chen, Junjie Gu, Shruthi Hebbur Prasanna Kumar, Guei-Yuan Lueh, Pankaj Mistry, Thomas Raoux, Konrad Trifunovic
CGO12
2013 Improved loop tiling based on the removal of spurious false dependences
abstract
To preserve the validity of loop nest transformations and parallelization, data dependences need to be analyzed. Memory dependences come in two varieties: true dependences or false dependences. While true dependences must be satisfied in order to preserve the correct order of computations, false dependences are induced by the reuse of a single memory location to store multiple values. False dependences reduce the degrees of freedom for loop transformations. In particular, loop tiling is severely limited in the presence of these dependences. While array expansion removes all false dependences, the overhead on memory and the detrimental impact on register-level reuse can be catastrophic. We propose and evaluate a compilation technique to safely ignore a large number of false dependences in order to enable loop nest tiling in the polyhedral model. It is based on the precise characterization of interferences between live range intervals, and it does not incur any scalar or array expansion. Our algorithms have been implemented in the Pluto polyhedral compiler, and evaluated on the PolyBench suite.
Riyadh Baghdadi, Albert Cohen 0001, Sven Verdoolaege, Konrad Trifunovic
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.4
2009 Polyhedral-Model Guided Loop-Nest Auto-Vectorization
abstract
Optimizing compilers apply numerous interdependent optimizations, leading to the notoriously difficult phase-ordering problem - that of deciding which transformations to apply and in which order. Fortunately, new infrastructures such as the polyhedral compilation framework host a variety of transformations, facilitating the efficient exploration and configuration of multiple transformation sequences. Many powerful optimizations, however, remain external to the polyhedral framework, including vectorization. The low-level, target-specific aspects of vectorization for fine-grain SIMD has so far excluded it from being part of the polyhedral framework. In this paper we examine the interactions between loop transformations of the polyhedral framework and subsequent vectorization. We model the performance impact of the different loop transformations and vectorization strategies, and then show how this cost model can be integrated seamlessly into the polyhedral representation. This predictive modelling facilitates efficient exploration and educated decision making to best apply various polyhedral loop transformations while considering the subsequent effects of different vectorization schemes. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and benefit of tuning the polyhedral model in the context of vectorization. Experimental results confirm that our model has accurate predictions, providing speedups of over 2.0times on average over traditional innermost-loop vectorization on PowerPC970 and Cell-SPU SIMD platforms.
Konrad Trifunovic, Dorit Nuzman, Albert Cohen 0001, Ayal Zaks, Ira Rosen
PACT1