Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anh-Tuyet Le

dblp:97/2659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool interoperability
0.012002
Process Support for Tools Interoperability · ASE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
component-based software engineering
0.012002
Process Support for Tools Interoperability · ASE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012002
Process Support for Tools Interoperability · ASE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow modeling · 0.0abstract process refinement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Process Support for Tools Interoperability
abstract
Summary form only given. Our work seeks to build a platform that makes entities of various types (component, COTS, tools, etc.) interoperate in order to build a new application. We call this new kind of application a federation. Our federations use workflow as a support for application integration and interoperability. In this approach, the process is not defined in term of tools and their parameters; instead, the process is high level and describes only abstract steps without knowledge on how these steps will be carried out. Therefore, the federation offers a means to describe and control the synchronization between the abstract and executable process, and a set of concrete tools. The federation ensures that the execution of the abstract level involves a compatible real execution at the concrete level. Indeed, the real execution requires the collaboration of several tools. The description on how the abstract level is refined into the real execution satisfies consistency rules and interoperability paradigms. We think our work contributes by providing a high level view in which the application can be described, independently from the real tools specificities, and by providing the means to describe the application behavior and the tools can be used and modified flexibly and dynamically.
Anh-Tuyet Le
ASE1