Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Charles Clark
dblp:97/3200
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-0327-1223ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Software-defined and programmable networks · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software-defined and programmable networks › network policy
policy composition |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | PGA: Using Graphs to Express and Automatically Reconcile Network Policies · SIGCOMM 2015 Network Policy Whiteboarding and Composition · SIGCOMM 2015 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › network policy
network policy specification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Network Policy Whiteboarding and Composition · SIGCOMM 2015 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › network function virtualization
service function chaining |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Network Policy Whiteboarding and Composition · SIGCOMM 2015 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › network policy
policy conflict resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | PGA: Using Graphs to Express and Automatically Reconcile Network Policies · SIGCOMM 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph-based policy composition · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mind the Semantic Gap: Policy Intent Inference from Network MetadataabstractNetwork Policy management is a tedious and laborious task because of scale and dynamic changes in the network. The advent of Softwarized Networks has led to a renewed interest in intent-based network policy management. Intent-based Networking provides a structured way of specifying the intent of policies which are automatically translated and compiled into network device configuration. While this top-down approach of policy intent to policy configuration has worked well for cloud-native infrastructures such as data centers, it has not seen much adoption in legacy networks. We believe one of the primary reasons for this is the semantic gap between policy intents and policy configurations. The problem is further exacerbated by the heterogeneity, scale-on-the-fly, fragmentation, and lack of structure in non-intent native networks. We introduce Policy Intent Inference (PII) System to bridge the semantic gap with its advanced inference layer that extracts the policy intents from policy configurations fragmented over disparate network devices. We adopt a bottom-up approach to extract all policies within network devices, abstract them into a structured data model, and with the use of clustering and information retrieval techniques, build an optimal solution to extract network-wide policy intents from the underlying network that eases policy management especially policy troubleshooting, reducing the configuration clutter and reducing the time taken to compile and resolve conflicts in policies. Anu Mercian, Faraz Ahmed, Shaun Wackerly, Charles Clark |
NetSoft | 5 |
| 2015 | Network Policy Whiteboarding and CompositionabstractWe present Policy Graph Abstraction (PGA) that graphically expresses network policies and service chain requirements, just as simple as drawing whiteboard diagrams. Different users independently draw policy graphs that can constrain each other. PGA graph clearly captures user intents and invariants and thus facilitates automatic composition of overlapping policies into a coherent policy. Jeongkeun Lee, Joon-Myung Kang, Chaithan Prakash, Yoshio Turner, Aditya Akella, Charles Clark, Yadi Ma, Puneet Sharma 0001, Ying Zhang 0022 |
SIGCOMM | 6 |
| 2015 | PGA: Using Graphs to Express and Automatically Reconcile Network PoliciesabstractSoftware Defined Networking (SDN) and cloud automation enable a large number of diverse parties (network operators, application admins, tenants/end-users) and control programs (SDN Apps, network services) to generate network policies independently and dynamically. Yet existing policy abstractions and frameworks do not support natural expression and automatic composition of high-level policies from diverse sources. We tackle the open problem of automatic, correct and fast composition of multiple independently specified network policies. We first develop a high-level Policy Graph Abstraction (PGA) that allows network policies to be expressed simply and independently, and leverage the graph structure to detect and resolve policy conflicts efficiently. Besides supporting ACL policies, PGA also models and composes service chaining policies, i.e., the sequence of middleboxes to be traversed, by merging multiple service chain requirements into conflict-free composed chains. Our system validation using a large enterprise network policy dataset demonstrates practical composition times even for very large inputs, with only sub-millisecond runtime latencies. Chaithan Prakash, Jeongkeun Lee, Yoshio Turner, Joon-Myung Kang, Aditya Akella, Sujata Banerjee, Charles Clark, Yadi Ma, Puneet Sharma 0001, Ying Zhang 0022 |
SIGCOMM | 7 |