Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Micheline Kamber
dblp:97/3517
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › pattern mining
association rule mining |
0.0 | 2 | 1997 | Metarule-Guided Mining of Multi-Dimensional Association Rules Using Data Cubes · KDD 1997 Evaluating the Interestingness of Characteristic Rules · KDD 1996 |
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
multidimensional association rule mining |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Metarule-Guided Mining of Multi-Dimensional Association Rules Using Data Cubes · KDD 1997 |
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
interestingness measures |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluating the Interestingness of Characteristic Rules · KDD 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data cube · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Metarule-Guided Mining of Multi-Dimensional Association Rules Using Data Cubes
Micheline Kamber, Jiawei Han 0001, Jenny Chiang |
KDD | 1 |
| 1996 | Evaluating the Interestingness of Characteristic Rules
Micheline Kamber, Rajjan Shinghal |
KDD | 1 |
| 1995 | Model-based 3-D segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in magnetic resonance brain imagesabstractHuman investigators instinctively segment medical images into their anatomical components, drawing upon prior knowledge of anatomy to overcome image artifacts, noise, and lack of tissue contrast. The authors describe: 1) the development and use of a brain tissue probability model for the segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images, and 2) an empirical comparison of the performance of statistical and decision tree classifiers, applied to MS lesion segmentation. Based on MR image data obtained from healthy volunteers, the model provides prior probabilities of brain tissue distribution per unit voxel in a standardized 3-D "brain space". In comparison to purely data-driven segmentation, the use of the model to guide the segmentation of MS lesions reduced the volume of false positive lesions by 50-80% Micheline Kamber, Rajjan Shinghal, D. Louis Collins, Gordon S. Francis, Alan C. Evans |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 1 |