EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Susan Price
dblp:97/4190 · also Susan L. Price
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Indexing and storage engines · 41% Query processing and optimization · 41% Database system architecture and tuning · 12% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines
column store |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Enhancements to SQL server column stores · SIGMOD Conference 2013 SQL server column store indexes · SIGMOD Conference 2011 |
Query processing and optimization › query execution › query operator implementation
vectorized query execution |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Enhancements to SQL server column stores · SIGMOD Conference 2013 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | SQL server column store indexes · SIGMOD Conference 2011 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Do batch and user evaluation give the same results? · SIGIR 2000 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › user-oriented evaluation
interactive retrieval evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Do batch and user evaluation give the same results? · SIGIR 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
batch processing · 0.3column store index · 0.2instance recall task · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Enhancements to SQL server column storesabstractSQL Server 2012 introduced two innovations targeted for data warehousing workloads: column store indexes and batch (vectorized) processing mode. Together they greatly improve performance of typical data warehouse queries, routinely by 10X and in some cases by a 100X or more. The main limitations of the initial version are addressed in the upcoming release. Column store indexes are updatable and can be used as the base storage for a table. The repertoire of batch mode operators has been expanded, existing operators have been improved, and query optimization has been enhanced. This paper gives an overview of SQL Server's column stores and batch processing, in particular the enhancements introduced in the upcoming release. Per-Åke Larson, Cipri Clinciu, Campbell Fraser, Eric N. Hanson, Mostafa Mokhtar, Michal Nowakiewicz, Vassilis Papadimos, Susan Price, Srikumar Rangarajan, Remus Rusanu, Mayukh Saubhasik |
SIGMOD Conference | 8 |
| 2012 | How doctors search: A study of query behaviour and the impact on search results
Marianne Lykke, Susan Price, Lois M. L. Delcambre |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 2 |
| 2011 | SQL server column store indexesabstractThe SQL Server 11 release (code named Denali) introduces a new data warehouse query acceleration feature based on a new index type called a column store index. The new index type combined with new query operators processing batches of rows greatly improves data warehouse query performance: in some cases by hundreds of times and routinely a tenfold speedup for a broad range of decision support queries. Column store indexes are fully integrated with the rest of the system, including query processing and optimization. This paper gives an overview of the design and implementation of column store indexes including enhancements to query processing and query optimization to take full advantage of the new indexes. The resulting performance improvements are illustrated by a number of example queries. Per-Åke Larson, Cipri Clinciu, Eric N. Hanson, Artem Oks, Susan Price, Srikumar Rangarajan, Aleksandras Surna |
SIGMOD Conference | 5 |
| 2009 | Using semantic components to search for domain-specific documents: An evaluation from the system perspective and the user perspective
Susan Price, Marianne Lykke, Lois M. L. Delcambre, Peter Vedsted, Jeremy Steinhauer |
Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2008 | Discounted Cumulated Gain Based Evaluation of Multiple-Query IR Sessions
Kalervo Järvelin, Susan Price, Lois M. L. Delcambre, Marianne Lykke |
ECIR | 2 |
| 2007 | Semantic components enhance retrieval of domain-specific documentsabstractWe seek to leverage knowledge about information organization in a domain to effectively and efficiently meet targeted information needs of expert users. The semantic components model represents document content in a manner that is complementary to full text and keyword indexing. Semantic component instances are segments of text about a particular aspect of the main topic of the document and may not correspond to structural elements in the document. This paper describes the semantic components model and presents experimental evidence from a large interactive searching study showing that semantic components, used to supplement full text and keyword indexing and to extend the query language, enhanced the retrieval of domain-specific documents in response to realistic queries posed by real users. Susan Price, Marianne Lykke, Lois M. L. Delcambre, Peter Vedsted |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2005 | Using Concept Relations to Improve Ranking in Information Retrieval
Susan Price, Lois M. L. Delcambre |
AMIA | 1 |
| 2002 | SmartQuery: context-sensitive links to medical knowledge sources from the electronic patient record
Susan Price, William R. Hersh, Daniel Olson, Peter J. Embí |
AMIA | 1 |
| 2001 | The Role of Computer Science and Computing Skills in a Medical Informatics Curriculum
Susan Price, Judith R. Logan, William R. Hersh |
AMIA | 1 |
| 2001 | Challenging conventional assumptions of automated information retrieval with real users: Boolean searching and batch retrieval evaluations
William R. Hersh, Andrew Turpin, Susan Price, Dale Kraemer, Daniel Olson, Benjamin Chan, Lynetta Sacherek |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 3 |
| 2000 | Assessing thesaurus-based query expansion using the UMLS Metathesaurus
William R. Hersh, Susan Price, Larry Donohoe |
AMIA | 2 |
| 2000 | Modeling Clinical Information Needs in the Context of a Specific Patient
Susan Price |
AMIA | 1 |
| 2000 | Do batch and user evaluation give the same results?abstractDo improvements in system performance demonstrated by batch evaluations confer the same benefit for real users? We carried out experiments designed to investigate this question. After identifying a weighting scheme that gave maximum improvement over the baseline in a non-interactive evaluation, we used it with real users searching on an instance recall task. Our results showed the weighting scheme giving beneficial results in batch studies did not do so with real users. Further analysis did identify other factors predictive of instance recall, including number of documents saved by the user, document recall, and number of documents seen by the user. William R. Hersh, Andrew Turpin, Susan Price, Benjamin Chan, Dale Kraemer, Lynetta Sacherek, Daniel Olson |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 1999 | Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web
Susan Price, William R. Hersh |
AMIA | 1 |