Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan Tuliani

dblp:97/4752 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › constrained coding
circuit codes
0.011998
Some New Circuit Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › combinatorial coding theory
combinatorial codes
0.011998
Some New Circuit Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.011998
Some New Circuit Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Coding theory › constrained coding
snake-in-the-box code
0.011998
Some New Circuit Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

computer search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Some New Circuit Codes
abstract
We present a new construction for snake-in-the-box codes and circuit codes. Our technique is based on arranging necklaces, i.e., equivalence classes of words under cyclic shifting, to form codes and gives 21 new codes of lengths 8-17, all having more words than the best previously known codes. Included among these are two snake-in-the-box codes: one of length 8 with 96 words, the other of length 10 with 340 words. We also report 15 new codes with small parameters. We prove the optimality of two of these codes and an already-known code. These last results were obtained using straightforward computer search.
Kenneth G. Paterson, Jonathan Tuliani
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2