EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ingrid B. Borecki
dblp:97/4939
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-8657-7964ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 71% Computational science and engineering · 29% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
microbiome analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Selection of models for the analysis of risk-factor trees: leveraging biological knowledge to mine large sets of risk factors with application to microbiome data · Bioinform. 2015 |
Computational science and engineering
model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Selection of models for the analysis of risk-factor trees: leveraging biological knowledge to mine large sets of risk factors with application to microbiome data · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › chromosomal aberration detection
copy number aberration detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
recurrent copy number alteration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-based scanning · 0.2stepwise regression · 0.2LASSO · 0.2CART · 0.2correlation matrix diagonal segmentation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Selection of models for the analysis of risk-factor trees: leveraging biological knowledge to mine large sets of risk factors with application to microbiome dataabstractMOTIVATION: Establishment of a statistical association between microbiome features and clinical outcomes is of growing interest because of the potential for yielding insights into biological mechanisms and pathogenesis. Extracting microbiome features that are relevant for a disease is challenging and existing variable selection methods are limited due to large number of risk factor variables from microbiome sequence data and their complex biological structure. RESULTS: We propose a tree-based scanning method, Selection of Models for the Analysis of Risk factor Trees (referred to as SMART-scan), for identifying taxonomic groups that are associated with a disease or trait. SMART-scan is a model selection technique that uses a predefined taxonomy to organize the large pool of possible predictors into optimized groups, and hierarchically searches and determines variable groups for association test. We investigate the statistical properties of SMART-scan through simulations, in comparison to a regular single-variable analysis and three commonly-used variable selection methods, stepwise regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and classification and regression tree (CART). When there are taxonomic group effects in the data, SMART-scan can significantly increase power by using bacterial taxonomic information to split large numbers of variables into groups. Through an application to microbiome data from a vervet monkey diet experiment, we demonstrate that SMART-scan can identify important phenotype-associated taxonomic features missed by single-variable analysis, stepwise regression, LASSO and CART. Qunyuan Zhang, Haley Abel, Alan Wells, Petra Lenzini, Felicia Gomez, Michael A. Province, Alan R. Templeton, George M. Weinstock, Nita H. Salzman, Ingrid B. Borecki |
Bioinform. | 10 |
| 2010 | CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution dataabstractMOTIVATION: DNA copy number aberration (CNA) is a hallmark of genomic abnormality in tumor cells. Recurrent CNA (RCNA) occurs in multiple cancer samples across the same chromosomal region and has greater implication in tumorigenesis. Current commonly used methods for RCNA identification require CNA calling for individual samples before cross-sample analysis. This two-step strategy may result in a heavy computational burden, as well as a loss of the overall statistical power due to segmentation and discretization of individual sample's data. We propose a population-based approach for RCNA detection with no need of single-sample analysis, which is statistically powerful, computationally efficient and particularly suitable for high-resolution and large-population studies. RESULTS: Our approach, correlation matrix diagonal segmentation (CMDS), identifies RCNAs based on a between-chromosomal-site correlation analysis. Directly using the raw intensity ratio data from all samples and adopting a diagonal transformation strategy, CMDS substantially reduces computational burden and can obtain results very quickly from large datasets. Our simulation indicates that the statistical power of CMDS is higher than that of single-sample CNA calling based two-step approaches. We applied CMDS to two real datasets of lung cancer and brain cancer from Affymetrix and Illumina array platforms, respectively, and successfully identified known regions of CNA associated with EGFR, KRAS and other important oncogenes. CMDS provides a fast, powerful and easily implemented tool for the RCNA analysis of large-scale data from cancer genomes. Qunyuan Zhang, David E. Larson, Daniel C. Koboldt, Michael D. McLellan, Ken Chen 0001, Xiaoqi Shi, Aldi T. Kraja, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, Ingrid B. Borecki, Michael A. Province |
Bioinform. | 11 |