Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
M. Hira
dblp:97/5236
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
0009-0005-2221-2498ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Verification of Tempura specification of sequential circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Verification of Tempura specification of sequential circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential circuit verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Verification of Tempura specification of sequential circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Verification of Tempura specification of sequential circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
verification conditions · 0.0goal reduction · 0.0binary decision diagrams · 0.0binary decision diagram · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Verification of Tempura specification of sequential circuitsabstractVerifying a sequential circuit consists in proving that the given implementation of the circuit satisfies its specification. In the present work the input-output specification of the circuit, which is required to hold for the given implementation, is assumed to be available in the form of a Tempura program segment B. It captures the desired ongoing behavior of the circuit in terms of input-output relationships that are expected to hold at various time instants of the interval in question. The implementation is given as a formula W/sub S/ of a first-order temporal equality theory, /spl Fscr/. Goal formulas of the form P /spl sup/ B have been introduced to capture the correctness property of the circuit in question. P is a formula of the equality theory /spl epsiv/ contained in /spl Fscr/ and encodes the initial state(s) of the circuit. A goal reduction paradigm has been used to formulate the proof calculus capturing the state transitions produced along the intervals. Formulas, called verification conditions (VC's), whose validity ensures the correctness of the circuit, are produced corresponding to the output equality statements in B. For finite state machines, VC's are formulas of propositional calculus and, therefore, require no temporal reasoning for their proofs. In fact, since binary decision diagram (BDD) representations are used throughout, their proofs become quite simple. The goal reduction rules proposed for iterative constructs also incorporate synthesis of invariant assertions over the states of the circuit. The proof of a nontrivial example has been presented. The paper concludes with a discussion on a broad overview of the building blocks of the verifier. M. Hira, Dipankar Sarkar 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |