Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eiji Nakajima
dblp:97/6309
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality assessment |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Experiments on quality evaluation of embedded software in Japan robot software design contest · ICSE 2006 |
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded software engineering
embedded software development |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Experiments on quality evaluation of embedded software in Japan robot software design contest · ICSE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structural complexity measurement · 0.1model-driven development · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Experiments on quality evaluation of embedded software in Japan robot software design contestabstractAs a practical opportunity for educating Japanese young developers in the field of embedded software development, a software design contest involving the design of software to automatically control a line-trace robot, and conduct running performance tests was held. In this paper,we give the results of the contest from the viewpoint of software quality evaluation. We create a framework for evaluating the software quality which integrated design model quality and the final system performance, and conduct analysis using the framework. As a result of analysis,it is found that the quantitative measurement of the structural complexity of the design models bears a strong relationship to qualitative evaluation of the design conducted by judges. It is also found that there is no strong correlation between design model quality evaluated by the judges and the final system performance. For embedded software development, it is particularly important to estimate and verify reliability and performance in the early stages,using the model. Based on the analysis result,we consider possible remedies with respect to the models submitted,the evaluation methods used and the contest specifications. In order to adequately measure several non-functional quality characteristics including performance on the model,it is necessary to improve the way of developing robot software (such as applying model driven development)and reexamine the evaluation methods. Hironori Washizaki, Yasuhide Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Eiji Nakajima, Yuji Hagiwara, Kenji Hiranabe, Kazuya Fukuda |
ICSE | 4 |