Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Toshiyuki Tsurumi
dblp:97/6449
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] · WWW 2007 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] · WWW 2007 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
modularity maximization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] · WWW 2007 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
scalable community detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] · WWW 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
balanced merging heuristic · 0.1CNM algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract]abstractCommunity analysis algorithm proposed by Clauset, Newman, and Moore (CNM algorithm) finds community structure in social networks. Unfortunately, CNM algorithm does not scale well and its use is practically limited to networks whose sizes are up to 500,000 nodes. We show that this inefficiency is caused from merging communities in unbalanced manner and that a simple heuristics that attempts to merge community structures in a balanced manner can dramatically improve community structure analysis. The proposed techniques are tested using data sets obtained from existing social networking service that hosts 5.5 million users. We have tested three three variations of the heuristics. The fastest method processes a SNS friendship network with 1 million users in 5 minutes (70 times faster than CNM) and another friendship network with 4 million users in 35 minutes, respectively. Another one processes a network with 500,000 nodes in 50 minutes (7 times faster than CNM), finds community structures that has improved modularity, and scales to a network with 5.5 million. Ken Wakita, Toshiyuki Tsurumi |
WWW | 2 |