Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiaosheng Liu

dblp:97/9343 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 56% Data mining · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning › database benchmarking
benchmark design
0.712023
FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature extraction
0.712023
FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Database system architecture and tuning
workload characterization
0.212023
FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online request simulation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction
abstract
As the use of online AI inference services rapidly expands in various applications (e.g., fraud detection in banking, product recommendation in e-commerce), real-time feature extraction (RTFE) systems have been developed to compute the requested features from incoming data tuples in ultra-low latency. Similar to relational databases, these RTFE procedures can be expressed using SQL-like languages. However, there is a lack of research on the workload characteristics and specialized benchmarks for RTFE, especially in comparison with existing database workloads and benchmarks (e.g., concurrent transactions in TPC-C). In this paper, we study the RTFE workload characteristics using over one hundred real datasets from open repositories (e.g. Kaggle, Tianchi, UCI ML, KiltHub) and those from 4Paradigm. The study highlights the significant differences between RTFE workloads and existing database benchmarks in terms of application scenarios, operator distributions, and query structures. Based on these findings, we propose to develop a realtime feature extraction benchmark named FEBench based on the four important criteria for a domain-specific benchmark proposed by Jim Gray. FEBench consists of selected representative datasets, query templates, and an online request simulator. We use FEBench to evaluate the effectiveness of feature extraction systems including OpenMLDB and Flink and find that each system exhibits distinct advantages and limitations in terms of overall latency, tail latency, and concurrency performance.
Xuanhe Zhou, Cheng Chen 0008, Kunyi Li, Bingsheng He, Mian Lu, Qiaosheng Liu, Guoliang Li 0001, Zhao Zheng, Yuqiang Chen
Proc. VLDB Endow.6
2011 Case-based parametric design system for test turntable
Qiaosheng Liu, Juntong Xi
Expert Syst. Appl.1