Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiaosheng Liu
dblp:97/9343
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 56% Data mining · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Database system architecture and tuning › database benchmarking
benchmark design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Database system architecture and tuning
workload characterization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature Extraction · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online request simulation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | FEBench: A Benchmark for Real-Time Relational Data Feature ExtractionabstractAs the use of online AI inference services rapidly expands in various applications (e.g., fraud detection in banking, product recommendation in e-commerce), real-time feature extraction (RTFE) systems have been developed to compute the requested features from incoming data tuples in ultra-low latency. Similar to relational databases, these RTFE procedures can be expressed using SQL-like languages. However, there is a lack of research on the workload characteristics and specialized benchmarks for RTFE, especially in comparison with existing database workloads and benchmarks (e.g., concurrent transactions in TPC-C). In this paper, we study the RTFE workload characteristics using over one hundred real datasets from open repositories (e.g. Kaggle, Tianchi, UCI ML, KiltHub) and those from 4Paradigm. The study highlights the significant differences between RTFE workloads and existing database benchmarks in terms of application scenarios, operator distributions, and query structures. Based on these findings, we propose to develop a realtime feature extraction benchmark named FEBench based on the four important criteria for a domain-specific benchmark proposed by Jim Gray. FEBench consists of selected representative datasets, query templates, and an online request simulator. We use FEBench to evaluate the effectiveness of feature extraction systems including OpenMLDB and Flink and find that each system exhibits distinct advantages and limitations in terms of overall latency, tail latency, and concurrency performance. Xuanhe Zhou, Cheng Chen 0008, Kunyi Li, Bingsheng He, Mian Lu, Qiaosheng Liu, Guoliang Li 0001, Zhao Zheng, Yuqiang Chen |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 6 |
| 2011 | Case-based parametric design system for test turntable
Qiaosheng Liu, Juntong Xi |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |