Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joanna Zhuang
dblp:97/9661
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
confounder adjustment |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
surrogate variable analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
independent surrogate variable analysis · 0.1independent component analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | A comparison of feature selection and classification methods in DNA methylation studies using the Illumina Infinium platformabstractBACKGROUND: The 27k Illumina Infinium Methylation Beadchip is a popular high-throughput technology that allows the methylation state of over 27,000 CpGs to be assayed. While feature selection and classification methods have been comprehensively explored in the context of gene expression data, relatively little is known as to how best to perform feature selection or classification in the context of Illumina Infinium methylation data. Given the rising importance of epigenomics in cancer and other complex genetic diseases, and in view of the upcoming epigenome wide association studies, it is critical to identify the statistical methods that offer improved inference in this novel context. RESULTS: Using a total of 7 large Illumina Infinium 27k Methylation data sets, encompassing over 1,000 samples from a wide range of tissues, we here provide an evaluation of popular feature selection, dimensional reduction and classification methods on DNA methylation data. Specifically, we evaluate the effects of variance filtering, supervised principal components (SPCA) and the choice of DNA methylation quantification measure on downstream statistical inference. We show that for relatively large sample sizes feature selection using test statistics is similar for M and β-values, but that in the limit of small sample sizes, M-values allow more reliable identification of true positives. We also show that the effect of variance filtering on feature selection is study-specific and dependent on the phenotype of interest and tissue type profiled. Specifically, we find that variance filtering improves the detection of true positives in studies with large effect sizes, but that it may lead to worse performance in studies with smaller yet significant effect sizes. In contrast, supervised principal components improves the statistical power, especially in studies with small effect sizes. We also demonstrate that classification using the Elastic Net and Support Vector Machine (SVM) clearly outperforms competing methods like LASSO and SPCA. Finally, in unsupervised modelling of cancer diagnosis, we find that non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) clearly outperforms principal components analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the importance of tailoring the feature selection and classification methodology to the sample size and biological context of the DNA methylation study. The Elastic Net emerges as a powerful classification algorithm for large-scale DNA methylation studies, while NMF does well in the unsupervised context. The insights presented here will be useful to any study embarking on large-scale DNA methylation profiling using Illumina Infinium beadarrays. Joanna Zhuang, Martin Widschwendter, Andrew E. Teschendorff |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studiesabstractMOTIVATION: A common difficulty in large-scale microarray studies is the presence of confounding factors, which may significantly skew estimates of statistical significance, cause unreliable feature selection and high false negative rates. To deal with these difficulties, an algorithmic framework known as Surrogate Variable Analysis (SVA) was recently proposed. RESULTS: Based on the notion that data can be viewed as an interference pattern, reflecting the superposition of independent effects and random noise, we present a modified SVA, called Independent Surrogate Variable Analysis (ISVA), to identify features correlating with a phenotype of interest in the presence of potential confounding factors. Using simulated data, we show that ISVA performs well in identifying confounders as well as outperforming methods which do not adjust for confounding. Using four large-scale Illumina Infinium DNA methylation datasets subject to low signal to noise ratios and substantial confounding by beadchip effects and variable bisulfite conversion efficiency, we show that ISVA improves the identifiability of confounders and that this enables a framework for feature selection that is more robust to model misspecification and heterogeneous phenotypes. Finally, we demonstrate similar improvements of ISVA across four mRNA expression datasets. Thus, ISVA should be useful as a feature selection tool in studies that are subject to confounding. AVAILABILITY: An R-package isva is available from www.cran.r-project.org. Andrew E. Teschendorff, Joanna Zhuang, Martin Widschwendter |
Bioinform. | 2 |