Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arif Yilmaz
dblp:98/10327
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 91% Privacy and data protection · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › multiparty signatures
aggregate signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic Data · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic Data · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
homomorphic signatures |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic Data · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic data |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic Data · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › health data privacy
genomic privacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic Data · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
homomorphic signature · 0.8digital consent · 0.8aggregate signatures · 0.4aggregate signature · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Analysis of the Impact of Data Augmentation on the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Multispectral Food Authenticity IdentificationabstractFood authenticity is a significant concern in the meat industry, demanding effective detection methods.This study explores the use of multispectral imaging (MSI) and deep learning for meat adulteration detection.We evaluate different deep learning models using transfer learning and preprocessing techniques in a multi-level adulteration classification task.In addition, we propose a novel approach called one-band mixed augmentation for band selection in MSI data, which outperforms traditional reflectance-based feature selection and enhances model robustness.Furthermore, employing the ninecrop approach for dataset augmentation improved the accuracy from 0.63 to 0.74 for DenseNet201 model without transfer learning.This research contributes to advancing food safety assessment practices and provides insights into the application of deep learning for preventing food adulteration.The proposed one-band mixed augmentation approach offers a novel strategy for handling band selection challenges in MSI data analysis. Yaru Zhang, Arif Yilmaz, Mirela Popa, Christopher Brewster |
FedCSIS | 2 |
| 2019 | Robust Optimization-Based Watermarking Scheme for Sequential Data
Erman Ayday, Emre Yilmaz 0002, Arif Yilmaz |
RAID | 3 |
| 2019 | Cryptographic Solutions for Credibility and Liability Issues of Genomic DataabstractIn this work, we consider a scenario that includes an individual sharing his genomic data (or results obtained from his genomic data) with a service provider. In this scenario, (i) the service provider wants to make sure that received genomic data (or results) in fact belongs to the corresponding individual (and computed correctly), (ii) the individual wants to provide a digital consent along with his data specifying whether the service provider is allowed to further share his data, and (iii) if his data is shared without his consent, the individual wants to determine the service provider that is responsible for this leakage. We propose two schemes based on homomorphic signature and aggregate signature that links the information about the legitimacy of the data to the consent and the phenotype of the individual. Thus, to verify the data, each party also needs to use the correct consent and phenotype of the individual who owns the data. Erman Ayday, Qiang Tang 0001, Arif Yilmaz |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 3 |
| 2010 | BALLON - An Ontology for Forensic Ballistics Domain
Arif Yilmaz, Hilal Tarakçi, Serdar Arslan |
KEOD | 1 |