Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hartwig R. Siebner

dblp:98/10736 · also Hartwig Roman Siebner · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
infinite relational model
0.112010
Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
relational model
0.112010
Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
functional connectivity
0.112010
Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.112010
Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutual information · 0.2infinite relational model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal decision making in humans
abstract
Ergodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theories of decision-making reveal how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimize wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics, whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown. Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing decision theories. Instead, as predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximize the time average growth of in-game wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations.
David Meder, Finn Rabe, Tobias Morville, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Magnus T. Koudahl, Ray Dolan, Hartwig R. Siebner, Oliver J. Hulme
PLoS Comput. Biol.7
2010 Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI
abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be applied to study the functional connectivity of the neural elements which form complex network at a whole brain level. Most analyses of functional resting state networks (RSN) have been based on the analysis of correlation between the temporal dynamics of various regions of the brain. While these models can identify coherently behaving groups in terms of correlation they give little insight into how these groups interact. In this paper we take a different view on the analysis of functional resting state networks. Starting from the definition of resting state as functional coherent groups we search for functional units of the brain that communicate with other parts of the brain in a coherent manner as measured by mutual information. We use the infinite relational model (IRM) to quantify functional coherent groups of resting state networks and demonstrate how the extracted component interactions can be used to discriminate between functional resting state activity in multiple sclerosis and normal subjects.
Morten Mørup, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Anne-Marie Dogonowski, Hartwig R. Siebner, Lars Kai Hansen
NIPS4