Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hartwig R. Siebner
dblp:98/10736 · also Hartwig Roman Siebner
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
infinite relational model |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
relational model |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
functional connectivity |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRI · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual information · 0.2infinite relational model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal decision making in humansabstractErgodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theories of decision-making reveal how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimize wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics, whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown. Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing decision theories. Instead, as predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximize the time average growth of in-game wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations. David Meder, Finn Rabe, Tobias Morville, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Magnus T. Koudahl, Ray Dolan, Hartwig R. Siebner, Oliver J. Hulme |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 7 |
| 2010 | Infinite Relational Modeling of Functional Connectivity in Resting State fMRIabstractFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be applied to study the functional connectivity of the neural elements which form complex network at a whole brain level. Most analyses of functional resting state networks (RSN) have been based on the analysis of correlation between the temporal dynamics of various regions of the brain. While these models can identify coherently behaving groups in terms of correlation they give little insight into how these groups interact. In this paper we take a different view on the analysis of functional resting state networks. Starting from the definition of resting state as functional coherent groups we search for functional units of the brain that communicate with other parts of the brain in a coherent manner as measured by mutual information. We use the infinite relational model (IRM) to quantify functional coherent groups of resting state networks and demonstrate how the extracted component interactions can be used to discriminate between functional resting state activity in multiple sclerosis and normal subjects. Morten Mørup, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Anne-Marie Dogonowski, Hartwig R. Siebner, Lars Kai Hansen |
NIPS | 4 |