Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vikas R. Vasisht

dblp:98/2001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Malware analysis · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Malware analysis
rootkit detection
0.112008
SHARK: Architectural support for autonomic protection against stealth by rootkit exploits · MICRO 2008
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
hardware-assisted security
0.112008
SHARK: Architectural support for autonomic protection against stealth by rootkit exploits · MICRO 2008
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security
0.012008
SHARK: Architectural support for autonomic protection against stealth by rootkit exploits · MICRO 2008
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 SHARK: Architectural support for autonomic protection against stealth by rootkit exploits
abstract
Rootkits have become a growing concern in cyber-security. Typically, they exploit kernel vulnerabilities to gain root privileges of a system and conceal malwarepsilas activities from users and system administrators without any authorization. Once infected, these malware applications will operate completely in stealth, leaving no trace for administrators and anti-malware tools. Current anti-rootkit solutions try to either strengthen the kernel by removing known vulnerabilities or develop software tools at the OS or virtual machine monitor levels to monitor the integrity of the kernel. Seeing the failure of these software techniques, we propose, in this paper, an autonomic architecture called SHARK, or secure hardware support against rootkit by employing hardware support to provide system-level security without trusting the software stack, including the OS kernel. SHARK enhances the relationship between the OS and the hardware architecture, making the entire system more security-aware in defending rootkits. SHARK proposes new architectural support to provide a secure association between each software context and the underlying hardware. It helps system administrators to obtain feedback directly from the hardware to reveal all running processes, even when the OS kernel is compromised. We emulated the functionality of SHARK by using x86 Bochs and modifying the Linux kernel version 2.6.16.33 based on our proposed architectural extension. Several real rootkits were installed to compromise the kernel and conceal malware processes on our emulated environment. SHARK is shown to be highly effective in identifying a variety of rootkits employing different software schemes. In addition, the performance analysis based on our Simics simulations shows a negligible overhead, making the SHARK architecture highly practical.
Vikas R. Vasisht, Hsien-Hsin S. Lee
MICRO1