Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. P. DeBlasis

dblp:98/280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning
database administration
0.011978
Review of Data Base Administrators Functions from a Survey · SIGMOD Conference 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 Review of Data Base Administrators Functions from a Survey
abstract
This paper reports some results from a survey of about thirty practicing data base administrators (DBA) in U.S. organizations of warying sizes and commitment to data base technology. From these observations some trends and evolutions of the data base administrator position are outlined. First, basic definitions and organizational considerations are set forth. The functions, interfaces and responsabilities of the DBA are discussed along with the DBMS tools available to carry out their tasks as recommended by various committees including CODASYL, GUIDE/SHARE, etc.Next, results of a survey of organizations staffed with data base administrators are presented. The survey stresses how the various recommendations regarding DBA implementation are reflected in reality and analyzes a number of significant parameters characterizing the DBA teams surveyed. An attempt to rationalize the aspirations and the actual status of the DBA is carried out. Finally, some trends in the evolution of the data base administration function are outlined from the survey results and from projections provided by the DBAs themselves. In light of these observations, some current recommendations are reviewed and others are proposed, especially with respect to the data administrator and data base administrator responsabilities.
J. P. DeBlasis, T. H. Johnson
SIGMOD Conference1