EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Pinzger 0002
dblp:98/5177-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-5536-3859ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 87% Cloud and datacenter computing · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automated Web Performance Analysis · ASE 2008 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automated Web Performance Analysis · ASE 2008 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter operations
server parameter tuning |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Automated Web Performance Analysis · ASE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation model refinement · 0.1monitoring · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Automated web performance analysis, with a special focus on predictionabstractToday the performance of web systems is getting ever more important, as the number of users and competitors is still increasing. Therefore performance analysis tools gain importance too. There are currently several tools on the market that ensure and test for adequate performance. There are a number of simulation tools and monitoring tools, but only few that automatise and combine both approaches. Martin Pinzger 0002 |
iiWAS | 1 |
| 2008 | Automated Web Performance AnalysisabstractPerformance is a key feature in many systems nowadays. There are several tools on the market that ensure and test for adequate performance. They, can be divided into simulation tools and monitoring tools. But only a few automatise and combine both approaches. This paper describes a system capable of automatically creating a web performance simulation and conducting trend analysis of the system under test (SUT). To achieve this the system requires input information, like Monitoring Points and Static-Information about the SUT. The system monitors and analyses the SUT and based on this information generates a simulation model of the system. The simulation model is refinded stepwise e.g. by adding or removing connections between the model components or adjusting the parameters until the aimed accuracy is achieved. With the help of the simulation model a prediction module creates an analysis of the SUT, and thereby can give as much information about the current state of the system and potential trends as possible. This predictive information can be used for pro-active server tuning or other performance optimisations. The focus of my PhD thesis is on the adjustment and prediction part of the system described here. For all other parts, already existing tools and techniques will be used where possible. This initial paper outlines the complete system. Martin Pinzger 0002 |
ASE | 1 |