Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandeep Juneja 0001

dblp:98/5399 · also Sandeep K. Juneja · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3735-3120ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 62% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Learning theory · 13%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Mathematical optimization · 46%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.922021
Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Bandits · COLT 2021
Sample complexity of partition identification using multi-armed bandits · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
a/b testing
0.812024
Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
average treatment effect estimation
0.812024
Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
experimental design
0.812024
Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
adaptive sampling
0.812024
Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
best arm identification
0.812024
Optimal Top-Two Method for Best Arm Identification and Fluid Analysis · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
sequential decision making
0.812024
Optimal Top-Two Method for Best Arm Identification and Fluid Analysis · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.512021
Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measures · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification
0.512021
Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measures · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
heavy-tailed bandits
0.512021
Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Bandits · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
index policy
0.512021
Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Bandits · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.512021
Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Bandits · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
pure exploration
0.412019
Sample complexity of partition identification using multi-armed bandits · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.112021
Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measures · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
optimization over probability measures
0.112021
Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measures · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

max-min optimization · 1.5confidence intervals · 1.5adaptive policy · 1.5value-at-risk · 1.0empirical-likelihood concentration inequality · 1.0conditional value-at-risk · 1.0implicit function theorem · 0.8fluid dynamics · 0.8truncated empirical mean · 0.5batch-based algorithm · 0.5sample complexity bounds · 0.4exponential family · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing
abstract
Motivated by practical applications in clinical trials and online platforms, we study A/B testing with the aim of estimating a confidence interval (CI) for the average treatment effect (ATE) using the minimum expected sample size. This CI should have a width at most $\epsilon$ while ensuring that the probability of the CI not containing the true ATE is at most $\delta$. To answer this, we first establish a lower bound on the expected sample size needed for any adaptive policy which constructs a CI of ATE with desired properties. Specifically, we prove that the lower bound is based on the solution to a max-min non-convex optimization problem for small $\delta$. Tailoring the “plug-in” approach for the ATE problem, we construct an adaptive policy that is asymptotically optimal, i.e., matches the lower bound on the expected sample size for small $\delta$. Interestingly, we find that, for small $\epsilon$ and $\delta$, the asymptotically optimal fraction of treatment assignment for A and B is proportional to the standard deviation of the outcome distributions of treatments A and B, respectively. However, as the proposed approach can be computationally intensive, we propose an alternative adaptive policy. This new policy, informed by insights from our lower bound analysis, is computationally efficient while remaining asymptotically optimal for small values of $\epsilon$ and $\delta$. Numerical comparisons demonstrate that both policies perform similarly across practical values of $\epsilon$ and $\delta$, offering efficient solutions for A/B testing.
Vikas Deep, Achal Bassamboo, Sandeep Juneja 0001
ICML3
2024 Optimal Top-Two Method for Best Arm Identification and Fluid Analysis
abstract
Top-2 methods have become popular in solving the best arm identification (BAI) problem. The best arm, or the arm with the largest mean amongst finitely many, is identified through an algorithm that at any sequential step independently pulls the empirical best arm, with a fixed probability $\beta$, and pulls the best challenger arm otherwise. The probability of incorrect selection is guaranteed to lie below a specified $\delta>0$. Information theoretic lower bounds on sample complexity are well known for BAI problem and are matched asymptotically as $\delta\to 0$ by computationally demanding plug-in methods. The above top 2 algorithm for any $\beta\in(0, 1)$ has sample complexity within a constant of the lower bound. However, determining the optimal β that matches the lower bound has proven difficult. In this paper, we address this and propose an optimal top-2 type algorithm. We consider a function of allocations anchored at a threshold. If it exceeds the threshold then the algorithm samples the empirical best arm. Otherwise, it samples the challenger arm. We show that the proposed algorithm is optimal as $\delta\to 0$. Our analysis relies on identifying a limiting fluid dynamics of allocations that satisfy a series of ordinary differential equations pasted together and that describe the asymptotic path followed by our algorithm. We rely on the implicit function theorem to show existence and uniqueness of these fluid ode’s and to show that the proposed algorithm remains close to the ode solution.
Agniv Bandyopadhyay, Sandeep Juneja 0001, Shubhada Agrawal
NeurIPS2
2023 Best arm identification in rare events
abstract
We consider the Best Arm Identification (BAI) problem in the stochastic multi-armed bandit framework, where each arm has a small probability of realizing large rewards, while with overwhelming probability, the reward is zero. A key application of this framework is in online advertising, where click rates of advertisements could be a fraction of a single percent and final conversion to sales, while highly profitable, may again be a small fraction of the click rates. Lately, algorithms for BAI problems have been developed that minimise sample complexity while providing statistical guarantees on the correct arm selection. As we observe, these algorithms can be computationally prohibitive. We exploit the fact that the reward process for each arm is well approximated by a Compound Poisson process and arrive at algorithms that are faster, with a small increase in sample complexity. We analyze the problem in an asymptotic regime as rarity of reward occurrence reduces to zero, and reward amounts increase to infinity. This helps illustrate the benefits of the proposed algorithm. It also sheds light on the underlying structure of the optimal BAI algorithms in the rare event setting.
Anirban Bhattacharjee, Sushant Vijayan, Sandeep Juneja 0001
UAI3
2021 Regret Minimization in Heavy-Tailed Bandits
abstract
We revisit the classic regret-minimization problem in the stochastic multi-armed bandit setting when the arm-distributions are allowed to be heavy-tailed. Regret minimization has been well studied in simpler settings of either bounded support reward distributions or distributions that belong to a single parameter exponential family. We work under the much weaker assumption that the moments of order \((1+\epsilon)\){are} uniformly bounded by a known constant \(B\), for some given \( \epsilon > 0\). We propose an optimal algorithm that matches the lower bound exactly in the first-order term. We also give a finite-time bound on its regret. We show that our index concentrates faster than the well-known truncated or trimmed empirical mean estimators for the mean of heavy-tailed distributions. Computing our index can be computationally demanding. To address this, we develop a batch-based algorithm that is optimal up to a multiplicative constant depending on the batch size. We hence provide a controlled trade-off between statistical optimality and computational cost.
Shubhada Agrawal, Sandeep Juneja 0001, Wouter M. Koolen
COLT2
2021 Optimal Best-Arm Identification Methods for Tail-Risk Measures
abstract
Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and value-at-risk (VaR) are popular tail-risk measures in finance and insurance industries as well as in highly reliable, safety-critical uncertain environments where often the underlying probability distributions are heavy-tailed. We use the multi-armed bandit best-arm identification framework and consider the problem of identifying the arm from amongst finitely many that has the smallest CVaR, VaR, or weighted sum of CVaR and mean. The latter captures the risk-return trade-off common in finance. Our main contribution is an optimal $\delta$-correct algorithm that acts on general arms, including heavy-tailed distributions, and matches the lower bound on the expected number of samples needed, asymptotically (as $ \delta$ approaches $0$). The algorithm requires solving a non-convex optimization problem in the space of probability measures, that requires delicate analysis. En-route, we develop new non-asymptotic, anytime-valid, empirical-likelihood-based concentration inequalities for tail-risk measures.
Shubhada Agrawal, Wouter M. Koolen, Sandeep Juneja 0001
NeurIPS3
2020 Optimal $δ$-Correct Best-Arm Selection for Heavy-Tailed Distributions
abstract
Given a finite set of unknown distributions $\textit{or arms}$ that can be sampled, we consider the problem of identifying the one with the largest mean using a delta-correct algorithm (an adaptive, sequential algorithm that restricts the probability of error to a specified delta) that has minimum sample complexity. Lower bounds for delta-correct algorithms are well known. Delta-correct algorithms that match the lower bound asymptotically as delta reduces to zero have been previously developed when arm distributions are restricted to a single parameter exponential family. In this paper, we first observe a negative result that some restrictions are essential, as otherwise under a delta-correct algorithm, distributions with unbounded support would require an infinite number of samples in expectation. We then propose a delta-correct algorithm that matches the lower bound as delta reduces to zero under the mild restriction that a known bound on the expectation of a non-negative, continuous, increasing convex function (for example, the squared moment) of the underlying random variables, exists. We also propose batch processing and identify near optimal batch sizes to substantially speed up the proposed algorithm. The best-arm problem has many learning applications, including recommendation systems and product selection. It is also a well studied classic problem in the simulation community.
Shubhada Agrawal, Sandeep Juneja 0001, Peter W. Glynn
ALT2
2019 Sample complexity of partition identification using multi-armed bandits
abstract
Given a vector of probability distributions, or arms, each of which can be sampled independently, we consider the problem of identifying the partition to which this vector belongs from a finitely partitioned universe of such vector of distributions. We study this as a pure exploration problem in multi-armed bandit settings and develop sample complexity bounds on the total mean number of samples required for identifying the correct partition with high probability. This framework subsumes well studied problems such as finding the best arm or the best few arms. We consider distributions belonging to the single parameter exponential family and primarily consider partitions where the vector of means of arms lie either in a given set or its complement. The sets considered correspond to distributions where there exists a mean above a specified threshold, where the set is a half space and where either the set or its complement is a polytope, or more generally, a convex set. In these settings, we characterize the lower bounds on mean number of samples for each arm highlighting their dependence on the problem geometry. Further, inspired by the lower bounds, we propose algorithms that can match these bounds asymptotically with decreasing probability of error. Applications of this framework may be diverse. We briefly discuss a few associated with simulation in finance.
Sandeep Juneja 0001, Subhashini Krishnasamy
COLT1
2014 Estimating Sensitivities of Portfolio Credit Risk Using Monte Carlo
abstract
Estimating the sensitivities of portfolio credit risk with respect to the underlying model parameters is an important problem for credit risk management. In this paper, we consider performance measures that may be expressed as an expectation of a performance function of the portfolio credit loss and derive closed-form expressions of its sensitivities to the underlying parameters. Our results are applicable to both idiosyncratic and macroeconomic parameters and to performance functions that may or may not be continuous. Based on the closed-form expressions, we first develop an estimator for sensitivities, in a general framework, that relies on the kernel method for estimation. The unified estimator allows us to further derive two general forms of the estimators by using conditioning techniques on either idiosyncratic or macroeconomic factors. We then specialize our results to develop faster estimators for three popular classes of models used for portfolio credit risk: latent variable models, Bernoulli mixture models, and doubly stochastic models.
L. Jeff Hong, Sandeep Juneja 0001
INFORMS J. Comput.2
2001 Splitting-based importance-sampling algorithm for fast simulation of Markov reliability models with general repair-policies
abstract
Markov chains with small transition probabilities occur while modeling the reliability of systems where the individual components are highly reliable and quickly repairable. Complex inter-component dependencies can exist and the state space involved can be huge, making these models analytically and numerically intractable. Naive simulation is also difficult because the event of interest (system failure) is rare, so that a prohibitively large amount of computation is needed to obtain samples of these events. An earlier paper (Juneja et al., 2001) proposed an importance sampling scheme that provides large efficiency increases over naive simulation for a very general class of models including reliability models with general repair policies such as deferred and group repairs. However, there is a statistical penalty associated with this scheme when the corresponding Markov chain has high probability cycles as may be the case with reliability models with general repair policies. This paper develops a splitting-based importance-sampling technique that avoids this statistical penalty by splitting paths at high probability cycles and thus achieves bounded relative-error in a stronger sense than in previous attempts.
Sandeep Juneja 0001, Perwez Shahabuddin
IEEE Trans. Reliab.1
1994 Effective Bandwidth and Fast Simulation of ATM Intree Networks
Cheng-Shang Chang, Philip Heidelberger, Sandeep Juneja 0001, Perwez Shahabuddin
Perform. Evaluation3