Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seungmook Lee
dblp:98/6726
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | HISSTA: a human in situ single-cell transcriptome atlas · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell type annotation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | HISSTA: a human in situ single-cell transcriptome atlas · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
differentially expressed gene identification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › time-series gene expression analysis
time-course microarray analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive visualization · 0.9in situ imaging · 0.9residual analysis · 0.0permutation test · 0.0ANOVA · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | HISSTA: a human in situ single-cell transcriptome atlasabstractMOTIVATION: Spatial transcriptomics holds great promise for revolutionizing biology and medicine by providing gene expression profiles with spatial information. Until recently, spatial resolution has been limited, but advances in high-throughput in situ imaging technologies now offer new opportunities by covering thousands of genes at a single-cell or even subcellular resolution, necessitating databases dedicated to comprehensive coverage and analysis with user-friendly intefaces. RESULTS: We introduce the HISSTA database, which facilitates the archival and analysis of in situ transcriptome data at single-cell resolution from various human tissues. We have collected and annotated spatial transcriptome data generated by MERFISH, CosMx SMI, and Xenium techniques, encompassing 112 samples and 28 million cells across 16 tissue types from 63 studies. To decipher spatial contexts, we have implemented advanced tools for cell type annotation, spatial colocalization, spatial cellular communication, and niche analyses. Notably, all datasets and annotations are interactively accessible through Vitessce, allowing users to focus on regions of interest and examine gene expression in detail. HISSTA is a unique database designed to manage the rapidly growing dataset of in situ transcriptomes at single-cell resolution. Given its comprehensive data content and advanced analysis tools with interactive visualizations, HISSTA is poised to significantly impact cancer diagnosis, precision medicine, and digital pathology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HISSTA is freely accessible at https://kbds.re.kr/hissta/. The source code is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14904523. Jiwon Yu, Jiwoo Moon, Gyeol Han, Insu Jang, Jinyoung Lim, Seungmook Lee, Seok-Hwan Yoon, Woong-Yang Park, Byungwook Lee, Sanghyuk Lee |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2011 | Enhanced peptide quantification using spectral count clustering and cluster abundanceabstractBACKGROUND: Quantification of protein expression by means of mass spectrometry (MS) has been introduced in various proteomics studies. In particular, two label-free quantification methods, such as spectral counting and spectra feature analysis have been extensively investigated in a wide variety of proteomic studies. The cornerstone of both methods is peptide identification based on a proteomic database search and subsequent estimation of peptide retention time. However, they often suffer from restrictive database search and inaccurate estimation of the liquid chromatography (LC) retention time. Furthermore, conventional peptide identification methods based on the spectral library search algorithms such as SEQUEST or SpectraST have been found to provide neither the best match nor high-scored matches. Lastly, these methods are limited in the sense that target peptides cannot be identified unless they have been previously generated and stored into the database or spectral libraries.To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel method, namely Quantification method based on Finding the Identical Spectral set for a Homogenous peptide (Q-FISH) to estimate the peptide's abundance from its tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra through the direct comparison of experimental spectra. Intuitively, our Q-FISH method compares all possible pairs of experimental spectra in order to identify both known and novel proteins, significantly enhancing identification accuracy by grouping replicated spectra from the same peptide targets. RESULTS: We applied Q-FISH to Nano-LC-MS/MS data obtained from human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and normal liver tissue samples to identify differentially expressed peptides between the normal and disease samples. For a total of 44,318 spectra obtained through MS/MS analysis, Q-FISH yielded 14,747 clusters. Among these, 5,777 clusters were identified only in the HCC sample, 6,648 clusters only in the normal tissue sample, and 2,323 clusters both in the HCC and normal tissue samples. While it will be interesting to investigate peptide clusters only found from one sample, further examined spectral clusters identified both in the HCC and normal samples since our goal is to identify and assess differentially expressed peptides quantitatively. The next step was to perform a beta-binomial test to isolate differentially expressed peptides between the HCC and normal tissue samples. This test resulted in 84 peptides with significantly differential spectral counts between the HCC and normal tissue samples. We independently identified 50 and 95 peptides by SEQUEST, of which 24 and 56 peptides, respectively, were found to be known biomarkers for the human liver cancer. Comparing Q-FISH and SEQUEST results, we found 22 of the differentially expressed 84 peptides by Q-FISH were also identified by SEQUEST. Remarkably, of these 22 peptides discovered both by Q-FISH and SEQUEST, 13 peptides are known for human liver cancer and the remaining 9 peptides are known to be associated with other cancers. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a novel statistical method, Q-FISH, for accurately identifying protein species and simultaneously quantifying the expression levels of identified peptides from mass spectrometry data. Q-FISH analysis on human HCC and liver tissue samples identified many protein biomarkers that are highly relevant to HCC. Q-FISH can be a useful tool both for peptide identification and quantification on mass spectrometry data analysis. It may also prove to be more effective in discovering novel protein biomarkers than SEQUEST and other standard methods. Seungmook Lee, Min-Seok Kwon, Hyoung-Joo Lee, Young-Ki Paik, Haixu Tang, Jae K. Lee, Taesung Park |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2003 | Statistical tests for identifying differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray experimentsabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray technology allows the monitoring of expression levels for thousands of genes simultaneously. In time-course experiments in which gene expression is monitored over time, we are interested in testing gene expression profiles for different experimental groups. However, no sophisticated analytic methods have yet been proposed to handle time-course experiment data. RESULTS: We propose a statistical test procedure based on the ANOVA model to identify genes that have different gene expression profiles among experimental groups in time-course experiments. Especially, we propose a permutation test which does not require the normality assumption. For this test, we use residuals from the ANOVA model only with time-effects. Using this test, we detect genes that have different gene expression profiles among experimental groups. The proposed model is illustrated using cDNA microarrays of 3840 genes obtained in an experiment to search for changes in gene expression profiles during neuronal differentiation of cortical stem cells. Taesung Park, Sung-Gon Yi, Seungmook Lee, Seung Yeoun Lee, Dong-Hyun Yoo, Jun-Ik Ahn, Yong-Sung Lee |
Bioinform. | 3 |