Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ian Endres
dblp:98/7658
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 63% Learning paradigms · 8% Segmentation and scene understanding · 6% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.5 | 3 | 2015 | Learning Discriminative Collections of Part Detectors for Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013 Learning shared body plans · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
part-based object detection |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Learning Discriminative Collections of Part Detectors for Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
part-based recognition |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013 Learning shared body plans · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
object proposal generation |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Category-Independent Object Proposals with Diverse Ranking · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014 Category Independent Object Proposals · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
attribute recognition |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Attribute-centric recognition for cross-category generalization · CVPR 2010 Describing objects by their attributes · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Category-Independent Object Proposals with Diverse Ranking · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › part-based recognition
discriminative part learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Building a dictionary of image fragments · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Building a dictionary of image fragments · CVPR 2012 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › generalization to unseen classes
cross-category generalization |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Attribute-centric recognition for cross-category generalization · CVPR 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
dataset construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | It's All About the Data · Proc. IEEE 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
visual feature learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | It's All About the Data · Proc. IEEE 2010 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
attribute selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Describing objects by their attributes · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › activity recognition
human activity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A latent model of discriminative aspect · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A latent model of discriminative aspect · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
manifold regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A latent model of discriminative aspect · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
word prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword prediction · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › low-level vision › feature detection
keypoint detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Learning Discriminative Collections of Part Detectors for Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Learning shared body plans · CVPR 2012 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Building a dictionary of image fragments · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Category Independent Object Proposals · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Web and social media mining
web mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | It's All About the Data · Proc. IEEE 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sigmoid weak learners · 0.4boosted classifier · 0.4structured learning · 0.3part detector learning · 0.3exemplar matching · 0.3discriminative test · 0.3graph cuts · 0.2affinity function · 0.2HOG features · 0.2joint detector training · 0.1generic object detection · 0.1crowdsourcing · 0.1contextual information extraction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Parking Lot Instance Segmentation from Satellite Imagery through Associative EmbeddingsabstractIn this paper, we apply the technique of instance segmentation through associative image embeddings using stacked hourglass networks to the problem of parking lot instance segmentation in satellite imagery. We sought an instance segmentation method that, unlike other common methods such as Mask R-CNN, was independent of object classification and robust to missing labeled instances. We demonstrate how associative image embeddings can be created, which can provide instance segmentation for use with any semantic segmentation map. Tessa Berry, Nicholas Dronen, Brett Jackson, Ian Endres |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 4 |
| 2015 | Learning Discriminative Collections of Part Detectors for Object RecognitionabstractWe propose a method to learn a diverse collection of discriminative parts from object bounding box annotations. Part detectors can be trained and applied individually, which simplifies learning and extension to new features or categories. We apply the parts to object category detection, pooling part detections within bottom-up proposed regions and using a boosted classifier with proposed sigmoid weak learners for scoring. On PASCAL VOC2010, we evaluate the part detectors' ability to discriminate and localize annotated keypoints and their effectiveness in detecting object categories. Kevin J. Shih, Ian Endres, Derek Hoiem |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2014 | Accelerating arrays of linear classifiers using approximate range queriesabstractModern object detection methods apply binary linear classifiers on Euclidean feature vectors. This paper shows that projecting feature vectors onto a hypersphere allows an approximate range query to accelerate these detectors within acceptable levels of accuracy. The expense of constructing the k-d tree used by these range queries is justified when many detectors are used. We demonstrate our acceleration technique on several existing detection systems, including a state of the art logo detector, and show that approximate range queries can detect logos at least half as well at 11× the speed of the full fidelity method. Victor Lu, Ian Endres, Matei Stroila, John C. Hart |
WACV | 2 |
| 2014 | Category-Independent Object Proposals with Diverse RankingabstractWe propose a category-independent method to produce a bag of regions and rank them, such that top-ranked regions are likely to be good segmentations of different objects. Our key objectives are completeness and diversity: Every object should have at least one good proposed region, and a diverse set should be top-ranked. Our approach is to generate a set of segmentations by performing graph cuts based on a seed region and a learned affinity function. Then, the regions are ranked using structured learning based on various cues. Our experiments on the Berkeley Segmentation Data Set and Pascal VOC 2011 demonstrate our ability to find most objects within a small bag of proposed regions. Ian Endres, Derek Hoiem |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2013 | Learning Collections of Part Models for Object RecognitionabstractWe propose a method to learn a diverse collection of discriminative parts from object bounding box annotations. Part detectors can be trained and applied individually, which simplifies learning and extension to new features or categories. We apply the parts to object category detection, pooling part detections within bottom-up proposed regions and using a boosted classifier with proposed sigmoid weak learners for scoring. On PASCAL VOC 2010, we evaluate the part detectors' ability to discriminate and localize annotated key points. Our detection system is competitive with the best-existing systems, outperforming other HOG-based detectors on the more deformable categories. Ian Endres, Kevin J. Shih, Johnston Jiaa, Derek Hoiem |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Learning shared body plansabstractWe cast the problem of recognizing related categories as a unified learning and structured prediction problem with shared body plans. When provided with detailed annotations of objects and their parts, these body plans model objects in terms of shared parts and layouts, simultaneously capturing a variety of categories in varied poses. We can use these body plans to jointly train many detectors in a shared framework with structured learning, leading to significant gains for each supervised task. Using our model, we can provide detailed predictions of objects and their parts for both familiar and unfamiliar categories. Ian Endres, Vivek Srikumar, Ming-Wei Chang, Derek Hoiem |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Building a dictionary of image fragmentsabstractWe show how to build large dictionaries of meaningful image fragments. These fragments could represent objects, objects in a local context, or parts of scenes. Our fragments operate as region-based exemplars, and we show how they can be used for image classification, to localize objects, and to compose new images. While each of these activities has been demonstrated before, each has required manually extracted fragments. Because our method for fragment extraction is automatic it can operate at a large scale. Our method uses recent advances in generic object detection techniques, together with discriminative tests to obtain good, clean fragment sets with extensive diversity. Our fragments are organized by the tags of the source images to build a semantically organized fragment table. A good set of fragment exemplars describes only the object, rather than object+context. Context could help identify an object; but it could also contribute noise, because other objects might appear in the same context. We show a slight improvement in classification performance by two standard exemplar matching methods using our fragment dictionary over such methods using image exemplars. This suggests that knowing the support of an exemplar is valuable. Furthermore, we demonstrate our automatically built fragment dictionary is capable of good localization. Finally, our fragment dictionary supports a keyword based fragment search system, which allows artists to get the fragments they need to make image collages. Zicheng Liao, Ali Farhadi, Yang Wang 0003, Ian Endres, David A. Forsyth |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2010 | Attribute-centric recognition for cross-category generalizationabstractWe propose an approach to find and describe objects within broad domains. We introduce a new dataset that provides annotation for sharing models of appearance and correlation across categories. We use it to learn part and category detectors. These serve as the visual basis for an integrated model of objects. We describe objects by the spatial arrangement of their attributes and the interactions between them. Using this model, our system can find animals and vehicles that it has not seen and infer attributes, such as function and pose. Our experiments demonstrate that we can more reliably locate and describe both familiar and unfamiliar objects, compared to a baseline that relies purely on basic category detectors. Ali Farhadi, Ian Endres, Derek Hoiem |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2010 | Category Independent Object Proposals
Ian Endres, Derek Hoiem |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2010 | It's All About the DataabstractModern computer vision research consumes labelled data in quantity, and building datasets has become an important activity. The Internet has become a tremendous resource for computer vision researchers. By seeing the Internet as a vast, slightly disorganized collection of visual data, we can build datasets. The key point is that visual data are surrounded by contextual information like text and HTML tags, which is a strong, if noisy, cue to what the visual data means. In a series of case studies, we illustrate how useful this contextual information is. It can be used to build a large and challenging labelled face dataset with no manual intervention. With very small amounts of manual labor, contextual data can be used together with image data to identify pictures of animals. In fact, these contextual data are sufficiently reliable that a very large pool of noisily tagged images can be used as a resource to build image features, which reliably improve on conventional visual features. By seeing the Internet as a marketplace that can connect sellers of annotation services to researchers, we can obtain accurately annotated datasets quickly and cheaply. We describe methods to prepare data, check quality, and set prices for work for this annotation process. The problems posed by attempting to collect very big research datasets are fertile for researchers because collecting datasets requires us to focus on two important questions: What makes a good picture? What is the meaning of a picture? Tamara L. Berg, Alexander Sorokin, Gang Wang 0012, David A. Forsyth, Derek Hoiem, Ian Endres, Ali Farhadi |
Proc. IEEE | 6 |
| 2009 | Describing objects by their attributesabstractWe propose to shift the goal of recognition from naming to describing. Doing so allows us not only to name familiar objects, but also: to report unusual aspects of a familiar object (“spotty dog”, not just “dog”); to say something about unfamiliar objects (“hairy and four-legged”, not just “unknown”); and to learn how to recognize new objects with few or no visual examples. Rather than focusing on identity assignment, we make inferring attributes the core problem of recognition. These attributes can be semantic (“spotty”) or discriminative (“dogs have it but sheep do not”). Learning attributes presents a major new challenge: generalization across object categories, not just across instances within a category. In this paper, we also introduce a novel feature selection method for learning attributes that generalize well across categories. We support our claims by thorough evaluation that provides insights into the limitations of the standard recognition paradigm of naming and demonstrates the new abilities provided by our attribute-based framework. Ali Farhadi, Ian Endres, Derek Hoiem, David A. Forsyth |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2009 | A latent model of discriminative aspectabstractRecognition using appearance features is confounded by phenomena that cause images of the same object to look different, or images of different objects to look the same. This may occur because the same object looks different from different viewing directions, or because two generally different objects have views from which they look similar. In this paper, we introduce the idea of discriminative aspect, a set of latent variables that encode these phenomena. Changes in view direction are one cause of changes in discriminative aspect, but others include changes in texture or lighting. However, images are not labelled with relevant discriminative aspect parameters. We describe a method to improve discrimination by inferring and then using latent discriminative aspect parameters. We apply our method to two parallel problems: object category recognition and human activity recognition. In each case, appearance features are powerful given appropriate training data, but traditionally fail badly under large changes in view. Our method can recognize an object quite reliably in a view for which it possesses no training example. Our method also reweights features to discount accidental similarities in appearance. We demonstrate that our method produces a significant improvement on the state of the art for both object and activity recognition. Ali Farhadi, Mostafa Kamali Tabrizi, Ian Endres, David A. Forsyth |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2009 | Unlabeled data improvesword predictionabstractLabeling image collections is a tedious task, especially when multiple labels have to be chosen for each image. In this paper we introduce a new framework that extends state of the art models in word prediction to incorporate information from unlabeled examples, using manifold regularization. To the best of our knowledge this is the first semi-supervised multi-task model used in vision problems. The new model can be solved using gradient descent and is fast and efficient. We show remarkable improvements for cases with few labeled examples for challenging multi-task learning problems in vision (predicting words for images and attributes for objects). Nicolas Loeff, Ali Farhadi, Ian Endres, David A. Forsyth |
ICCV | 3 |