Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. C. Barus

dblp:99/10113 · also Arlinta Christy Barus · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › random testing
adaptive random testing
0.212016
A Cost-Effective Random Testing Method for Programs with Non-Numeric Inputs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Software testing › specification-based testing
category-partition testing
0.212016
A Cost-Effective Random Testing Method for Programs with Non-Numeric Inputs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016
Software testing
random testing
0.212016
A Cost-Effective Random Testing Method for Programs with Non-Numeric Inputs · IEEE Trans. Computers 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

p-measure · 0.2f-measure · 0.2empirical study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A Cost-Effective Random Testing Method for Programs with Non-Numeric Inputs
abstract
Random testing (RT) has been widely used in the testing of various software and hardware systems. Adaptive random testing (ART) is a family of random testing techniques that aim to enhance the failure-detection effectiveness of RT by spreading random test cases evenly throughout the input domain. ART has been empirically shown to be effective on software with numeric inputs. However, there are two aspects of ART that need to be addressed to render its adoption more widespread-applicability to programs with nonnumeric inputs, and the high computation overhead of many ART algorithms. We present a linear-order ART algorithm for software with non-numeric inputs. The key requirement for using ART with non-numeric inputs is an appropriate “distance” measure. We use the concepts of categories and choices from category-partition testing to formulate such a measure. We investigate the failure-detection effectiveness of our technique by performing an empirical study on 14 object programs, using two standard metrics-F-measure and P-measure. Our ART algorithm statistically significantly outperforms RT on 10 of the 14 programs studied, and exhibits performance similar to RT on three of the four remaining programs. The selection overhead of our ART algorithm is close to that of RT.
A. C. Barus, Tsong Yueh Chen, Fei-Ching Kuo, Huai Liu, Robert G. Merkel, Gregg Rothermel
IEEE Trans. Computers1