Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yifan Sun 0007

dblp:99/10261-7 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7969-1147ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
3D vision · 76% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14% Robot navigation and mapping · 10%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 83% Mathematical optimization · 17%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
1.732023
Jigsaw: Learning to Assemble Multiple Fractured Objects · NeurIPS 2023
Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-wise Relative Poses · CVPR 2023
K-Best Transformation Synchronization · ICCV 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape analysis
0.712023
Jigsaw: Learning to Assemble Multiple Fractured Objects · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.712023
Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-wise Relative Poses · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › 3d segmentation
surface segmentation
0.712023
Jigsaw: Learning to Assemble Multiple Fractured Objects · NeurIPS 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph clustering
0.712023
Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-wise Relative Poses · CVPR 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › active vision
view selection
0.512021
Learning View Selection for 3D Scenes · CVPR 2021
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.412019
K-Best Transformation Synchronization · ICCV 2019
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
symmetry detection
0.412019
K-Best Transformation Synchronization · ICCV 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph synchronization
0.312018
Joint Map and Symmetry Synchronization · ECCV (5) 2018
Mathematical optimization
joint optimization
0.212023
Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-wise Relative Poses · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
shape matching
0.112018
Joint Map and Symmetry Synchronization · ECCV (5) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

refinement · 1.3joint optimization · 1.3diffusion · 1.3clustering · 1.3point feature extraction · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7attention · 0.7view prediction network · 0.5trainable aggregation module · 0.5continuation · 0.5transformation clustering · 0.4iterative optimization · 0.4synchronization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-wise Relative Poses
abstract
Pose synchronization, which seeks to estimate consistent absolute poses among a collection of objects from noisy relative poses estimated between pairs of objects in isolation, is a fundamental problem in many inverse applications. This paper studies an extreme setting where multiple relative pose estimates exist between each object pair, and the majority is incorrect. Popular methods that solve pose synchronization via recovering a low-rank matrix that encodes relative poses in block fail under this extreme setting. We introduce a three-step algorithm for pose synchronization under multiple relative pose inputs. The first step performs diffusion and clustering to compute the candidate poses of the input objects. We present a theoretical result to justify our diffusion formulation. The second step jointly optimizes the best pose for each object. The final step refines the output of the second step. Experimental results on benchmark datasets of structure-from-motion and scan-based geometry reconstruction show that our approach offers more accurate absolute poses than state-of-the-art pose synchronization techniques.
Yifan Sun 0007, Qixing Huang
CVPR1
2023 Jigsaw: Learning to Assemble Multiple Fractured Objects
abstract
Automated assembly of 3D fractures is essential in orthopedics, archaeology, and our daily life. This paper presents Jigsaw, a novel framework for assembling physically broken 3D objects from multiple pieces. Our approach leverages hierarchical features of global and local geometry to match and align the fracture surfaces. Our framework consists of four components: (1) front-end point feature extractor with attention layers, (2) surface segmentation to separate fracture and original parts, (3) multi-parts matching to find correspondences among fracture surface points, and (4) robust global alignment to recover the global poses of the pieces. We show how to jointly learn segmentation and matching and seamlessly integrate feature matching and rigidity constraints. We evaluate Jigsaw on the Breaking Bad dataset and achieve superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Our method also generalizes well to diverse fracture modes, objects, and unseen instances. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first learning-based method designed specifically for 3D fracture assembly over multiple pieces. Our code is available at https://jiaxin-lu.github.io/Jigsaw/.
Jiaxin Lu 0001, Yifan Sun 0007, Qixing Huang
NeurIPS2
2023 TAssembly: Data-driven fractured object assembly using a linear template model
Ziyue Deng, Qingqiang Yao, Yifan Sun 0007, Zhenpei Yang, Siming Yan, Qixing Huang, Chandrajit L. Bajaj
Comput. Graph.7
2021 Learning View Selection for 3D Scenes
abstract
Efficient 3D space sampling to represent an underlying 3D object/scene is essential for 3D vision, robotics, and beyond. A standard approach is to explicitly sample a dense collection of views and formulate it as a view selection problem, or, more generally, a set cover problem. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach that avoids dense view sampling. The key idea is to learn a view prediction network and a trainable aggregation module that takes the predicted views as input and outputs an approximation of their generic scores (e.g., surface coverage, viewing angle from surface normals). This methodology allows us to turn the set cover problem (or multi-view representation optimization) into a continuous optimization problem. We then explain how to effectively solve the induced optimization problem using continuation, i.e., aggregating a hierarchy of smoothed scoring modules. Experimental results show that our approach arrives at similar or better solutions with about 10 x speed up in running time, comparing with the standard methods.
Yifan Sun 0007, Qixing Huang, Dun-Yu Hsiao, Gang Hua 0001
CVPR1
2019 K-Best Transformation Synchronization
abstract
In this paper, we introduce the problem of K-best transformation synchronization for the purpose of multiple scan matching. Given noisy pair-wise transformations computed between a subset of depth scan pairs, K-best transformation synchronization seeks to output multiple consistent relative transformations. This problem naturally arises in many geometry reconstruction applications, where the underlying object possesses self-symmetry. For approximately symmetric or even non-symmetric objects, K-best solutions offer an intermediate presentation for recovering the underlying single-best solution. We introduce a simple yet robust iterative algorithm for K-best transformation synchronization, which alternates between transformation propagation and transformation clustering. We present theoretical guarantees on the robust and exact recoveries of our algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate the advantage of our approach against state-of-the-art transformation synchronization techniques on both synthetic and real datasets.
Yifan Sun 0007, Jiacheng Zhuo, Arnav Mohan, Qixing Huang
ICCV1
2018 Joint Map and Symmetry Synchronization
Yifan Sun 0007, Zhenxiao Liang, Xiangru Huang, Qixing Huang
ECCV (5)1