EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mehmet Çetin
dblp:99/11312
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3458-4177ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% Distributed systems · 44% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud service reliability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cloud Uptime Archive: Open-Access Availability Data of Web, Cloud, and Gaming Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cloud Uptime Archive: Open-Access Availability Data of Web, Cloud, and Gaming Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
simulation-based evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Cloud Uptime Archive: Open-Access Availability Data of Web, Cloud, and Gaming Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retry mechanisms · 1.0checkpointing simulation · 1.0MTBF/MTTR analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cloud Uptime Archive: Open-Access Availability Data of Web, Cloud, and Gaming ServicesabstractCloud services are critical to society. However, their reliability is poorly understood. Towards solving the problem, we propose a standard repository for cloud uptime data. We populate this repository with the data we collect containing failure reports from users and operators of cloud services, web services, and online games. The multiple vantage points help reduce bias from individual users and operators. We compare our new data to existing failure data from the Failure Trace Archive and the Google cluster trace. We analyze the MTBF and MTTR, time patterns, failure severity, user-reported symptoms, and operator-reported symptoms of failures in the data we collect. We observe that high-level user facing services fail less often than low-level infrastructure services, likely due to them using fault-tolerance techniques. We use simulation-based experiments to demonstrate the impact of different failure traces on the performance of checkpointing and retry mechanisms. We release the data, and the analysis and simulation tools, as open-source artifacts available athttps://github.com/atlarge-research/cloud-uptime-archive. Sacheendra Talluri, Dante Niewenhuis, Xiaoyu Chu, Jakob Kyselica, Mehmet Çetin, Alexander Balgavy, Alexandru Iosup |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 5 |
| 2023 | Less is not more: We need rich datasets to exploreabstractTraditional datacenter analysis is based on high-level, coarse-grained metrics. This obscures our vision of datacenter behavior, as we do not observe the full picture nor subtleties that might make up these high-level, coarse metrics. There is room for operational improvement based on fine-grained temporal and spatial, low-level metric data. We leverage in this work one of the (rare) public datasets providing fine-grained information on datacenter operations, with over 60 billion measurements captured in 15-second intervals. We show evidence that fine-grained information reveals new operational aspects, that the different metrics cannot be derived from one another (and thus need to be captured), and that many low-level metrics, gathered frequently are key to understanding datacenter operations. We propose a holistic analysis for datacenter operations, providing statistical characterization of node and workload aspects. Our analysis reveals both generic and machine learning-specific aspects, summarized in over 30 observations, providing deep insight into this dataset and the originating cluster. We give actionable insights, surprising findings, and exemplify how our observations support performance-engineering tasks such as workload prediction and long-term datacenter design. Laurens Versluis, Mehmet Çetin, Caspar Greeven, Kristian Laursen, Damian Podareanu, Valeriu Codreanu, Alexandru Uta, Alexandru Iosup |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 2 |