Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Charles E. McCarthy

dblp:99/1389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 75% Distributed systems · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes
0.011976
Implementation of an Experimental Fault-Tolerant Memory System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure recovery
0.011976
Implementation of an Experimental Fault-Tolerant Memory System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
memory fault tolerance
0.011976
Implementation of an Experimental Fault-Tolerant Memory System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction › error-correcting codes
SECDED
0.011976
Implementation of an Experimental Fault-Tolerant Memory System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-testing translator/corrector · 0.0fault insertion · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 Implementation of an Experimental Fault-Tolerant Memory System
abstract
The experimental fault-tolerant memory system described in this paper has been designed to enable the modular addition of spares, to validate the theoretical fault-secure and self-testing properties of the translator/corrector, to provide a basis for experiments using the new testing and correction processes for recovery, and to determine the practicality of such systems. The hardware design and implementation are described, together with methods of fault insertion. The hardware/ software interface, including a restricted single error correction/double error detection (SEC/DED) code, is specified. Procedures are carefully described which, 1) test for specified physical faults, 2) ensure that single error corrections are not miscorrections due to triple faults, and 3) enable recovery from double errors.
William C. Carter, Charles E. McCarthy
IEEE Trans. Computers2