Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henry D. Knowles

dblp:99/144 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0002-9016-4927ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 87% Image and video coding · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
multi-modal tracking
0.112007
The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video · CVPR 2007
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.112007
The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video · CVPR 2007
Image and video processing › image fusion
multi-sensor video fusion
0.112007
The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video · CVPR 2007
Image and video processing › image fusion
pixel-level fusion
0.112007
The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video · CVPR 2007
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
image fusion quality assessment
0.012007
The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video · CVPR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural similarity measure · 0.1particle filter · 0.1dual-tree complex wavelet transform · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 The Effect of Pixel-Level Fusion on Object Tracking in Multi-Sensor Surveillance Video
abstract
This paper investigates the impact of pixel-level fusion of videos from visible (VIZ) and infrared (IR) surveillance cameras on object tracking performance, as compared to tracking in single modality videos. Tracking has been accomplished by means of a particle filter which fuses a colour cue and the structural similarity measure (SSIM). The highest tracking accuracy has been obtained in IR sequences, whereas the VIZ video showed the worst tracking performance due to higher levels of clutter. However, metrics for fusion assessment clearly point towards the supremacy of the multiresolutional methods, especially Dual Tree-Complex Wavelet Transform method. Thus, a new, tracking-oriented metric is needed that is able to accurately assess how fusion affects the performance of the tracker.
Nedeljko Cvejic, Stavri G. Nikolov, Henry D. Knowles, Artur Loza, Alin Achim, David Bull 0001, Cedric Nishan Canagarajah
CVPR3
2003 Bayesian approach to attack characterization using robust watermarks
Henry D. Knowles, Dominique A. Winne, Cedric Nishan Canagarajah, David Bull 0001
VCIP1
2003 Efficient watermarking system with increased reliability for video authentication
Dominique A. Winne, Henry D. Knowles, David Bull 0001, Cedric Nishan Canagarajah
VCIP2
2002 Spatial digital watermark for MPEG-2 video authentication and tamper detection
abstract
The widespread adoption of digital video techniques has generated a requirement for authenticity verification in applications such as criminal evidence, insurance claims and commercial databases. This work addresses problems that arise from a spatial digital watermarking technique developed to detect frame reordering and dropping scenarios. It discusses the differences between mutual frame types at different bit-rates. Many papers consider detection after MPEG-2 decoding as a naïve approach. However, this approach does offer significant advantages for a slight increase of computation load. This paper also establishes a link between the detector performance and the sequence content. The uniqueness of this work is the comparison of the test results using 18 different standard MPEG test-sequences. The functionality of the algorithm is demonstrated with a simulated attack.
Dominique A. Winne, Henry D. Knowles, David Bull 0001, Cedric Nishan Canagarajah
ICASSP2