Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Theodore Hammer
dblp:99/3021
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › specification-based testing
requirements-based testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Measuring Requirements Testing · ICSE 1997 |
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Measuring Requirements Testing · ICSE 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
project data analysis · 0.0metrics · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Measuring Requirements TestingabstractRequirements are written to specify the functionality of a completed software system.Software systems are often released in segments called builds, each one adding new functionality and satisfying an additional set of requirements.New software requirements tools are allowing quality assurance engineers to develop and use new metrics to assist them in evaluating the relationships of requirements to tests, thus ensuring the required functionality in the new system.NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center is applying new tools and technology to measure the effectiveness of requirements testing.This paper discusses an effort that uses project data to demonstrate metrics effectiveness. Theodore Hammer, Linda H. Rosenberg, Lenore Huffman, Lawrence E. Hyatt |
ICSE | 1 |
| 1997 | Requirements Metrics - Value AddedabstractSummary form only given. Actions in the requirements phase can directly impact the success or failure of a project. It is critical that project management utilize all available tools to identify potential problems and risks as early in the development as possible, especially in the requirements phase. The Software Assurance Technology Center (GSFC) and the Quality Assurance Division at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center are working on developing and applying metrics from the onset of project development, starting in the requirements phase. This talk will discuss the results of a metrics effort on a real, large system development at GSFC and lessons learned from this experience. The development effort for this project uses an automated tool to manage requirements decomposition. This report focuses on the metrics used to assess the requirement decomposition effort and to identify potential risks. The report discusses how metric analysis in the requirements phase can be accomplished on any government or industry project. The use of an automated tool to manage requirement development facilitation of metrics for improved insight into development and risk assessment will also be expanded. Theodore Hammer, Linda H. Rosenberg, Lenore Huffman, Lawrence E. Hyatt |
RE | 1 |