Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joel R. Remde
dblp:99/3199
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
User interface design and tools · 44% Learning and educational technologies · 44% Usability and user experience research · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › user interaction
hypertext navigation |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser · CHI 1989 |
Information retrieval › document organization › hypertext
hypertext systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browser · CHI 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
behavioral evaluation · 0.0user study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Behavioral evaluation and analysis of a hypertext browserabstractStudents performed a variety of tasks using a statistics text presented either in conventional printed form or via the text browser “SuperBook” (Remde, Gomez and Landauer [18]). Students using SuperBook answered more search questions correctly, wrote higher quality “open-book” essays, and recalled certain incidental information better than students using the conventional text. Subjective ratings overwhelmingly favored SuperBook. The advantage of SuperBook appears to be particularly strong for questions that are not anticipated by the author's organization of a text. Dennis E. Egan, Joel R. Remde, Thomas K. Landauer, Carol C. Lochbaum, Louis M. Gomez |
CHI | 2 |
| 1989 | Formative Design-Evaluation of SuperBookabstractSuperBook is a hypertext browsing system designed to improve the usability of conventional documents. Successive versions of SuperBook were evaluated in a series of behavioral studies. Students searched for information in a statistics text. presented either in conventional printed form or in SuperBook form. The best version of SuperBook enabled students to answer search questions more quickly and accurately than they could with the conventional text. Students wrote higher quality “open-book” essays using SuperBook than they did with the conventional text, and their subjective ratings of the documentation strongly favored SuperBook. This work is a case study of formative design-evaluation. Behavioral evaluation of the first version of SuperBook showed how design factors and user strategies affected search and established baseline performance measures with printed text. The second version of SuperBook was implemented with the goal of improving search accuracy and speed. User strategies that had proved effective in the first study were made very easy and attractive to use. System response time for common operations was greatly improved. Behavioral evaluation of the new SuperBook demonstrated its superiority to printed text and suggested additional improvements that were incorporated into “MiteyBook,” a SuperBook implementation for PC-size screens. Search with MiteyBook proved to be approximately 25 percent faster and 25 percent more accurate than that obtained with a conventional printed book. Dennis E. Egan, Joel R. Remde, Louis M. Gomez, Thomas K. Landauer, Jennifer Eberhardt, Carol C. Lochbaum |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 1982 | A new model of LPC excitation for producing natural-sounding speech at low bit ratesabstractThe excitation for LPC speech synthesis usually consists of two separate signals - a delta-function pulse once every pitch period for voiced speech and white noise for unvoiced speech. This manner of representing excitation requires that speech segments be classified accurately into voiced and unvoiced categories and the pitch period of voiced segments be known. It is now well recognized that such a rigid idealization of the vocal excitation is often responsible for the unnatural quality associated with synthesized speech. This paper describes a new approach to the excitation problem that does not require a priori knowledge of either the voiced-unvoiced decision or the pitch period. All classes of sounds are generated by exciting the LPC filter with a sequence of pulses; the amplitudes and locations of the pulses are determined using a non-iterative analysis-by-synthesis procedure. This procedure minimizes a perceptual-distance metric representing subjectively-important differences between the waveforms of the original and the synthetic speech signals. The distance metric takes account of the finite-frequency resolution as well as the differential sensitivity of the human ear to errors in the formant and inter-formant regions of the speech spectrum. Bishnu S. Atal, Joel R. Remde |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 1981 | Split-band APC System for low bit-rate encoding of speechabstractWe describe a split-band adaptive predictive coding system for digital transmission of speech signals. In this system, the prediction residue signal obtained after spectral prediction is filtered into 2 or more frequency bands. Each of the filtered signals is reduced further by pitch prediction and is quantized by a 15-level noise feedback quantizer. The input to the quantizer is severely center-clipped to produce a quantized signal with low entropy. The division of the prediction residue signal into many frequency bands results in more accurate pitch prediction - particularly, at low frequencies. The split-band system uses separate quantizers for each frequency band. The step size of the quantizer and the center-clipping threshold can thus be adjusted to optimize speech quality in each band. Bishnu S. Atal, Joel R. Remde |
ICASSP | 2 |