Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lars Liebmann

dblp:99/5701 · also Lars W. Liebmann · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 13 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Electronic design automation · 95% Integrated circuit design · 5%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.542015
Pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm: are we ready? · DAC 2015
Layout Decomposition and Legalization for Double-Patterning Technology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Co-Optimization of Circuits, Layout and Lithography for Predictive Technology Scaling Beyond Gratings · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010
Electronic design automation › physical design › lithography
layout decomposition
0.422015
Pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm: are we ready? · DAC 2015
Layout Decomposition and Legalization for Double-Patterning Technology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Electronic design automation › physical design › lithography
multiple patterning lithography
0.422015
Pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm: are we ready? · DAC 2015
Layout Decomposition and Legalization for Double-Patterning Technology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Electronic design automation › physical design
mask optimization
0.212015
Pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm: are we ready? · DAC 2015
Electronic design automation › physical design
lithography
0.222013
Layout Decomposition and Legalization for Double-Patterning Technology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Enabling Alternating Phase Shifted Mask Designs for a Full Logic Gate Level: Design Rules and Design Rule Checking · DAC 2001
Electronic design automation
design for manufacturability
0.112010
Co-Optimization of Circuits, Layout and Lithography for Predictive Technology Scaling Beyond Gratings · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010
Electronic design automation › physical design
layout synthesis
0.112010
Co-Optimization of Circuits, Layout and Lithography for Predictive Technology Scaling Beyond Gratings · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.012010
Co-Optimization of Circuits, Layout and Lithography for Predictive Technology Scaling Beyond Gratings · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010
Electronic design automation › physical design › layout verification
design rule checking
0.012001
Enabling Alternating Phase Shifted Mask Designs for a Full Logic Gate Level: Design Rules and Design Rule Checking · DAC 2001
Integrated circuit design
VLSI design
0.012001
Enabling Alternating Phase Shifted Mask Designs for a Full Logic Gate Level: Design Rules and Design Rule Checking · DAC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 0.2integer linear programming · 0.2graph coloring heuristic · 0.2optical proximity correction · 0.1layout templates · 0.1cost-per-good-die analysis · 0.1design rule checking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm: are we ready?
abstract
Due to elongated delay of extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL), the semiconductor industry has been pushing the 193nm immersion lithopgrahy using multiple patterning to print critical features in 22nm/14nm technology nodes and beyond. Multiple patterning lithography (MPL) poses many new challenges to both mask design and IC physical design. The mask layout decomposition problem has been extensively studied, first on double patterning, then on triple or even quadruple patterning. Meanwhile, many studies have shown that it is very important to consider MPL implications at early physical design stages so that the overall design and manufacturing closure can be reached. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview on the state-of-the-art research results for MPL, from synergistic mask synthesis to physical design. We will also discuss the open problems as to pushing multiple patterning in sub-10nm.
David Z. Pan, Lars Liebmann, Bei Yu 0001, Yibo Lin
DAC2
2015 Standard Cell Layout Regularity and Pin Access Optimization Considering Middle-of-Line
abstract
As minimum feature size and pitch spacing further decrease in advanced technology nodes, many new design constraints and challenges are introduced, such as regularity, middle of line (MOL) structures, and pin-access challenges. In this work, we propose a comprehensive study on standard cell layout regularity and pin access optimization. Given irregular cell layout from old technology nodes, our cell optimization tool can search unidirectional migrated result where the self-aligned double patterning (SADP) and MOL based design constraints are satisfied, and the pin-accessibility is optimized. This problem is formulated as a general integer linear programming (ILP), which may suffer from long runtime for some large standard cell cases. Therefore, we also develop a set of hybrid techniques to quickly search for high-quality solutions. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches.
Wei Ye 0008, Bei Yu 0001, David Z. Pan, Yongchan Ban, Lars Liebmann
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI5
2014 Design and technology co-optimization near single-digit nodes
abstract
As we approach single-digit nodes, traditional design for manufacturability is augmented through several methodologies and design paradigms such as design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), systematic yield limiters optimization (SYLO), and design retargeting. We discuss triple-patterning and spacer-based multiple patterning and their design implications as these technologies will be necessary to cruise us to single-digit nodes. With the help of DTCO, there seems to be a clear path to sub-10nm with or without extreme ultra-violet lithography.
Lars Liebmann, Rasit Onur Topaloglu
ICCAD1
2014 Sub-20 nm design technology co-optimization for standard cell logic
abstract
Efficiency and manufacturability of standard cell logic is critical for an IC, as standard cells are at the heart of the nexus between technology definition, circuit design and physical synthesis. Conventional standard cell design techniques are increasingly ineffective as we scale to patterning restricted sub-20 nm CMOS nodes. To meet the constraints and leverage the features of future technology offerings, we propose a holistic design technology co-optimization (DTCO) for standard cell logic. In our holistic DTCO we co-optimize the standard cell architecture to balance manufacturability and efficiency at the cell level while taking into account block level considerations such as pin accessibility and power rail robustness. Our DTCO in a foundry 14 nm CMOS resulted in two standard cell architectures, namely, 10T_BiDir and 10T_UniDir. We evaluated these cell libraries with physically synthesized blocks and ring oscillator test structures in IBM 14SOI process. We observed that 10T_BiDir emerges as the preferred alternative at 14 nm CMOS, with 10T_UniDir promising better scalability to future nodes.
Kaushik Vaidyanathan, Lars Liebmann, Andrzej J. Strojwas, Lawrence T. Pileggi
ICCAD2
2013 Layout Decomposition and Legalization for Double-Patterning Technology
abstract
The use of multiple-patterning (MP) optical lithography for sub-20 nm technologies has inevitably become slow to adopt the next generation of lithography systems. The biggest technical challenge of MP is failure to reach a manufacturable layout-coloring solution, especially in dense layouts. This paper offers a post layout solution for the removal of conflicts, i.e., patterns that cannot be assigned to different masks without violating spacing rules. The proposed method essentially consists of three steps: 1) layout coloring; 2) exposure layers; 3) geometric rules definition; and 4) layout legalization using compaction and MP rules as constraints. The method is general and can be used for different MP technologies, including lithography-etch, lithography-etch double-patterning (DP), triple patterning/MP (i.e., multiple litho-etch steps), and self-aligned DP (SADP). For demonstration purposes, we apply the proposed method in this paper to remove conflicts in DP. We offer anO(n) layout-coloring heuristic algorithm for DP, which is up to 80× faster than the integer linear program-based approach. The conflict-removal problem is formulated as a linear program, which permits an extremely fast runtime (less than 1 min in real time for macro layouts). The method was tested on standard cells and macro layouts from a commercial 22-nm library designed without any MP awareness. For many cells, the method removes all conflicts without any area increase. For some complex cells and macros, the method still removes all conflicts but with a modest 6% average increase in area.
Rani S. Ghaida, Kanak Agarwal 0001, Sani R. Nassif, Lars Liebmann, Puneet Gupta 0001
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.5
2011 A framework for double patterning-enabled design
abstract
While the next generation of lithography systems is still under development, extending optical lithography using double patterning (DP) is the only solution to continue technology scaling. The biggest technical challenge of DP is the presence of mask-assignment conflicts in dense layers. In this paper, we propose a framework for DP conflict removal for standard cells. First, we offer an O(n) algorithm for mask assignment (up to 200× faster than the ILP-based approach) that guarantees a conflict-free solution if one exists. We then formulate the problem of conflict removal as a linear program (LP), which permits an extremely fast run-time (less than 10 seconds in real time for typical cells). The framework removes DP conflicts and legalizes the layout across all layers simultaneously while minimizing layout perturbation. For cells from a commercial 22nm library designed without any DP awareness, our method usually removes all DP conflicts without any area increase; for some complex cells, the method still removes all conflicts with a modest 6.7% average increase in area. The method is more general, however, and can also be applied for macro layouts and the interconnect layers in complete designs as we demonstrate in the paper.
Rani S. Ghaida, Kanak Agarwal 0001, Sani R. Nassif, Lars Liebmann, Puneet Gupta 0001
ICCAD5
2010 Co-Optimization of Circuits, Layout and Lithography for Predictive Technology Scaling Beyond Gratings
abstract
The financial backbone of the semiconductor industry is based on doubling the functional density of integrated circuits every two years at fixed wafer costs and die yields. The increasing demands for 'computational' rather than 'physical' lithography to achieve the aggressive density targets, along with the complex device-engineering solutions needed to maintain the power density objectives, have caused a rapid escalation in systematic yield limiters that threaten scaling. Specifically, the traditional contract between design and manufacturing based solely on design rules is no longer sufficient to guarantee functional silicon and instead requires a convoluted set of restrictions that force complex modifications to the already costly design flows. In this paper, we claim that a far superior result can be achieved by moving the design-to-manufacturing interface from design rules to a higher level of abstraction based on a defined set of pre-characterized layout templates. We will demonstrate how this methodology can simplify optical proximity correction and lithography processes for sub-32 nm technology nodes, along with various digital block design examples for synthesized intellectual property (IP) cores. Furthermore, with a cost-per-good-die analysis we will show that this methodology will extend economical scaling to sub-32 nm technology nodes.
Tejas Jhaveri, Vyacheslav Rovner, Lars Liebmann, Lawrence T. Pileggi, Andrzej J. Strojwas, Jason Hibbeler
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3
2008 Electrically driven optical proximity correction based on linear programming
abstract
Conventional optical proximity correction (OPC) tools aim to minimize edge placement errors (EPE) due to the optical and resist process by moving mask edges. However, in low-k1 lithography, especially at 45 nm and beyond, printing perfect polygons is practically impossible to achieve. In addition, prohibitively high mask complexity is incurred, leading to high mask cost. Given the impossibility of perfect printing, we argue that aiming to reduce the error of electrical discrepancy between the ideal and the printed contours is a more reasonable strategy. In fact, we show that contours with non-minimal EPE may result in closer match to the desired electrical performance. Towards achieving this objective, we developed a new electrically driven OPC (ED-OPC) algorithm. The tool combines lithography simulation with accurate electrical modeling of resist contours to predict the on/off current through a transistor gate. The computation of mask edge movements is cast as a linear program based on optical and electrical sensitivities. The objective is to minimize the error in saturation current between printed and target shapes. This optimization is then solved with fast runtime. The results on industrial 45 nm SOI layouts using high-NA immersion lithography models show up to a 5% improvement in accuracy of timing over conventional OPC. This is achieved at less than 26% runtime overheads, while also lowering mask complexity by up to 43%. The results confirm that better timing accuracy can be achieved despite larger edge placement error.
Shayak Banerjee, Praveen Elakkumanan, Lars Liebmann, Michael Orshansky
ICCAD3
2007 Rules vs tools: what's the right way to address IC manufacturing complexity?
abstract
Modern IC manufacturing processes are enormously complex. There are at least two possible approaches for dealing with this. On the one hand, we can come up with a relatively small number of specific structures that are known to work. This simplifies the design problem enormously, but limits, to at least some extent, what we can build. On the far extreme, we can model every step of the manufacturing process in gory detail. This allows a sufficiently motivated and intelligent designer to achieve the highest performance of which a process is capable, but at a huge cost in complexity. Many intermediate solutions are of course possible. Our panelists, as befits their varied backgrounds, will stake out different positions along the complexity-performance tradeoff, and argue that their position is the true sweet spot, where the bulk of IC design should be done.
Louis K. Scheffer, Lars Liebmann, Riko Rakojcic
ISPD2
2003 Layout impact of resolution enhancement techniques: impediment or opportunity?
abstract
This tutorial introduces the reader to the basic concepts of optical lithography, derives fundamental resolution limits, reviews the challenges facing future technology nodes, explains the principles of resolution enhancement techniques and their impact on chip layout, and discusses layout optimization considerations.
Lars Liebmann
ISPD1
2002 CAD computation for manufacturability: can we save VLSI technology from itself?
abstract
Every 18 to 24 months, the areal density of VLSI doubles and the predicted date for the End Of CMOS Scaling is pushed out approximately 18 to 24 months. This rate of growth has been controlled mainly by the increasing capabilities of lithographic patterning. However, the rate of improvement of lithography systems in key parameters such as illumination wavelength has begun to slow. To make up the shortfall, lithography has increasingly turned to using CAD tools to transform the geometric shapes in designs into shapes on photomasks which have been compensated for systematic pattern-distorting effects. As the requirements for this compensation grow, however, it becomes increasingly difficult to hide in post-tapeout data preparation, and must be considered in back-end design tools and methodologies. We describe a number of the challenges to lithographic patterning, highlighting the factors that limit physical scaling and introduce the layout-to-mask shape transformations that compensate for these limitations. We describe the implementation of these transformations in general-purpose and specialized CAD tools, pointing out challenges like growth of computation effort. Finally, we describe how limitations of post-tapeout compensation drive the need for litho-aware design tools, showing examples in cell design, place-and-route, and layout migration.
Mark A. Lavin, Lars Liebmann
ICCAD2
2001 Enabling Alternating Phase Shifted Mask Designs for a Full Logic Gate Level: Design Rules and Design Rule Checking
abstract
The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors lists F2 (1 = 157 nm) optical lithography and extreme ultraviolet next generation lithography as the two most feasible lithography solutions for the 70 nm technology node. It is likely that both of these solutions will be late, forcing ArF (1 = 193 nm) lithography to operate at unprecedented resolution levels. Theoretically, alternating phase shifted masks (“altPSM”) can achieve the resolution required to manufacture 70 nm logic products with ArF lithography equipment, but technical and logistical challenges associated with the broad implementation of altPSM require novel and invasive EDA solutions which have caused the industry to shy away from altPSM in the past. One of the biggest such challenges is the creation of robust design rule checking (DRC) tools which can predict whether a given layout has a valid, manufacturable altPSM solution. This paper takes a detailed look at the technical and practical issues associated with altPSM design rules and DRC.
Lars Liebmann, Jennifer Lund, Fook-Luen Heng, Ioana Graur
DAC1
2001 Application of automated design migration to alternating phase shift mask design
abstract
The use of phase shifted mask (PSM) has been demonstrated to be a powerful resolution enhancement technique (RET) for the printing of features at dimensions below the exposure wavelength in deep submicron technologies. Its implementation in physical design has introduced non-conventional design ground rules, which impact the traditional layout migration process and designers productivity. In this panel discussion paper, we propose a solution to extend the traditional constraint-based layout migration and legalization approach. The solution has been demonstrated to be very effective in practice.
Fook-Luen Heng, Lars Liebmann, Jennifer Lund
ISPD2