Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter R. Kraus
dblp:99/6566
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer animation and physical simulation
rigid body simulation |
0.0 | 2 | 1998 | Analysis of Frictional Contact Models for Dynamic Simulation · ICRA 1998 Compliant contact models for rigid body collisions · ICRA 1997 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › contact simulation
frictional contact |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Analysis of Frictional Contact Models for Dynamic Simulation · ICRA 1998 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
contact modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Compliant contact models for rigid body collisions · ICRA 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singular perturbation theory · 0.0linear complementarity theory · 0.0compliant contact model · 0.0coefficient of restitution · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Analysis of Frictional Contact Models for Dynamic SimulationabstractSimulation of dynamic systems possessing unilateral frictional contacts is important to many industrial applications. While rigid body models are often employed, it is well established that friction can cause problems with the existence and uniqueness of the forward dynamics problem. In these situations, we argue that compliant contact models, while increasing the length of the state vector, successfully resolve these ambiguities. The simplicity and efficiency of rigid body models, however, provide strong motivation for their use during those portions of a simulation when the compliant contact model indicates a unique and stable solution. We use singular perturbation theory in combination with linear complementarity theory to establish conditions for the validity of the rigid body model with rolling and sliding unilateral contacts for planar systems. The results are illustrated with a simple example. Peter R. Kraus, Pierre Dupont |
ICRA | 1 |
| 1997 | Compliant contact models for rigid body collisionsabstractPrevious work in rigid body dynamic simulation has relied on rigid body impact models to model collisions. The well-known models due to Newton, Poisson, and Brach, are each based on a definition of a coefficient of restitution for rigid body impact. The objective of this paper is to develop a new model that overcomes the deficiencies of these models in frictional impacts and to present a formulation to solve problems with multiple concurrent impacts. The model is based on simple mechanical elements that model energy storage and dissipation at each contact. We present an algorithm for simulating concurrent impacts between rigid bodies and illustrate its application with a variation of the peg-in-hole insertion problem. Peter R. Kraus |
ICRA | 1 |