Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kenneth A. Norman
dblp:99/6772
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5887-9682ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
3D vision · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Generative modeling · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 97% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 3% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data · ICML 2024 Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › brain decoding
fMRI-to-image reconstruction |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data · ICML 2024 Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
brain decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
continual self-supervised learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › self-supervised visual representation learning
self-supervised vision model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
computational cognitive science |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priors · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning? · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle filtering |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free Recall · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › memory architectures
hippocampal model |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Hippocampal Model of Recognition Memory · NIPS 1997 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Hippocampal Model of Recognition Memory · NIPS 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 1.1negative sampling · 1.1functional alignment · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8img2img · 0.7diffusion prior · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7CLIP latent space · 0.7memory mechanisms · 0.6memory mechanism · 0.6topic model · 0.1particle filter · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1neural network model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Episodic memory supports the acquisition of structured task representations
Qihong Lu, Ali Hummos, Kenneth A. Norman |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2024 | MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of DataabstractReconstructions of visual perception from brain activity have improved tremendously, but the practical utility of such methods has been limited. This is because such models are trained independently per subject where each subject requires dozens of hours of expensive fMRI training data to attain high-quality results. The present work showcases high-quality reconstructions using only 1 hour of fMRI training data. We pretrain our model across 7 subjects and then fine-tune on minimal data from a new subject. Our novel functional alignment procedure linearly maps all brain data to a shared-subject latent space, followed by a shared non-linear mapping to CLIP image space. We then map from CLIP space to pixel space by fine-tuning Stable Diffusion XL to accept CLIP latents as inputs instead of text. This approach improves out-of-subject generalization with limited training data and also attains state-of-the-art image retrieval and reconstruction metrics compared to single-subject approaches. MindEye2 demonstrates how accurate reconstructions of perception are possible from a single visit to the MRI facility. All code is available on Github: https://github.com/MedARC-AI/MindEyeV2 Paul S. Scotti, Mihir Tripathy, Cesar Kadir Torrico Villanueva, Reese Kneeland, Tong Chen 0011, Ashutosh Narang, Charan Santhirasegaran, Jonathan Xu, Thomas Naselaris, Kenneth A. Norman, Tanishq Mathew Abraham |
ICML | 10 |
| 2023 | Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion PriorsabstractWe present MindEye, a novel fMRI-to-image approach to retrieve and reconstruct viewed images from brain activity. Our model comprises two parallel submodules that are specialized for retrieval (using contrastive learning) and reconstruction (using a diffusion prior). MindEye can map fMRI brain activity to any high dimensional multimodal latent space, like CLIP image space, enabling image reconstruction using generative models that accept embeddings from this latent space. We comprehensively compare our approach with other existing methods, using both qualitative side-by-side comparisons and quantitative evaluations, and show that MindEye achieves state-of-the-art performance in both reconstruction and retrieval tasks. In particular, MindEye can retrieve the exact original image even among highly similar candidates indicating that its brain embeddings retain fine-grained image-specific information. This allows us to accurately retrieve images even from large-scale databases like LAION-5B. We demonstrate through ablations that MindEye's performance improvements over previous methods result from specialized submodules for retrieval and reconstruction, improved training techniques, and training models with orders of magnitude more parameters. Furthermore, we show that MindEye can better preserve low-level image features in the reconstructions by using img2img, with outputs from a separate autoencoder. All code is available on GitHub. Paul S. Scotti, Atmadeep Banerjee, Jimmie Goode, Stepan Shabalin, Ethan Cohen, Aidan J. Dempster, Nathalie Verlinde, Elad Yundler, David Weisberg, Kenneth A. Norman, Tanishq Mathew Abraham |
NeurIPS | 11 |
| 2022 | Event Segmentation In Story Listening Using Deep Language Models
Manoj Kumar 0025, Ariel Goldstein, Sebastian Michelmann, Jeffrey M. Zacks, Kenneth A. Norman, Uri Hasson |
CogSci | 5 |
| 2022 | How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning?abstractHumans learn from visual inputs at multiple timescales, both rapidly and flexibly acquiring visual knowledge over short periods, and robustly accumulating online learning progress over longer periods. Modeling these powerful learning capabilities is an important problem for computational visual cognitive science, and models that could replicate them would be of substantial utility in real-world computer vision settings. In this work, we establish benchmarks for both real-time and life-long continual visual learning. Our real-time learning benchmark measures a model's ability to match the rapid visual behavior changes of real humans over the course of minutes and hours, given a stream of visual inputs. Our life-long learning benchmark evaluates the performance of models in a purely online learning curriculum obtained directly from child visual experience over the course of years of development. We evaluate a spectrum of recent deep self-supervised visual learning algorithms on both benchmarks, finding that none of them perfectly match human performance, though some algorithms perform substantially better than others. Interestingly, algorithms embodying recent trends in self-supervised learning -- including BYOL, SwAV and MAE -- are substantially worse on our benchmarks than an earlier generation of self-supervised algorithms such as SimCLR and MoCo-v2. We present analysis indicating that the failure of these newer algorithms is primarily due to their inability to handle the kind of sparse low-diversity datastreams that naturally arise in the real world, and that actively leveraging memory through negative sampling -- a mechanism eschewed by these newer algorithms -- appears useful for facilitating learning in such low-diversity environments. We also illustrate a complementarity between the short and long timescales in the two benchmarks, showing how requiring a single learning algorithm to be locally context-sensitive enough to match real-time learning changes while stable enough to avoid catastrophic forgetting over the long term induces a trade-off that human-like algorithms may have to straddle. Taken together, our benchmarks establish a quantitative way to directly compare learning between neural networks models and human learners, show how choices in the mechanism by which such algorithms handle sample comparison and memory strongly impact their ability to match human learning abilities, and expose an open problem space for identifying more flexible and robust visual self-supervision algorithms. Chengxu Zhuang, Yoon Bai, Xiaoxuan Jia, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Kenneth A. Norman, James J. DiCarlo, Dan Yamins |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2020 | Learning Generalizations and Exceptions: the Good, the Bad and the Unpredictable
Karina Tachihara, Adele Goldberg 0002, Kenneth A. Norman |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2020 | Self-Other Similarity Modulates the Socially-Triggered Context-Based Prediction Error Effect on Memory
Madalina Vlasceanu, Michael J. Morais, Zidong Zhao, Aaron M. Bornstein, Diana I. Tamir, Kenneth A. Norman, Alin Coman |
CogSci | 6 |
| 2020 | The method of loci is an optimal policy for memory search
Kenneth A. Norman, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2020 | BrainIAK tutorials: User-friendly learning materials for advanced fMRI analysisabstractAdvanced brain imaging analysis methods, including multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), functional connectivity, and functional alignment, have become powerful tools in cognitive neuroscience over the past decade. These tools are implemented in custom code and separate packages, often requiring different software and language proficiencies. Although usable by expert researchers, novice users face a steep learning curve. These difficulties stem from the use of new programming languages (e.g., Python), learning how to apply machine-learning methods to high-dimensional fMRI data, and minimal documentation and training materials. Furthermore, most standard fMRI analysis packages (e.g., AFNI, FSL, SPM) focus on preprocessing and univariate analyses, leaving a gap in how to integrate with advanced tools. To address these needs, we developed BrainIAK (brainiak.org), an open-source Python software package that seamlessly integrates several cutting-edge, computationally efficient techniques with other Python packages (e.g., Nilearn, Scikit-learn) for file handling, visualization, and machine learning. To disseminate these powerful tools, we developed user-friendly tutorials (in Jupyter format; https://brainiak.org/tutorials/) for learning BrainIAK and advanced fMRI analysis in Python more generally. These materials cover techniques including: MVPA (pattern classification and representational similarity analysis); parallelized searchlight analysis; background connectivity; full correlation matrix analysis; inter-subject correlation; inter-subject functional connectivity; shared response modeling; event segmentation using hidden Markov models; and real-time fMRI. For long-running jobs or large memory needs we provide detailed guidance on high-performance computing clusters. These notebooks were successfully tested at multiple sites, including as problem sets for courses at Yale and Princeton universities and at various workshops and hackathons. These materials are freely shared, with the hope that they become part of a pool of open-source software and educational materials for large-scale, reproducible fMRI analysis and accelerated discovery. Manoj Kumar 0025, Cameron T. Ellis, Qihong Lu, Mihai Capota, Theodore L. Willke, Peter J. Ramadge, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Kenneth A. Norman |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 9 |
| 2019 | A generalization becomes suppressed over time in the context of exceptions
Karina Tachihara, Kenneth A. Norman, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Adele Goldberg 0002 |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2018 | Measuring representational similarity across neural networks
Qihong Lu, Peter J. Ramadge, Kenneth A. Norman, Uri Hasson |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2018 | A mouse-tracking study of how exceptions to a probabilistic generalization are learned
Karina Tachihara, Kenneth A. Norman, Nicholas B. Turk-Browne, Adele Goldberg 0002 |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2016 | Enabling factor analysis on thousand-subject neuroimaging datasetsabstractThe scale of functional magnetic resonance image data is rapidly increasing as large multi-subject datasets are becoming widely available and high-resolution scanners are adopted. The inherent low-dimensionality of the information in this data has led neuroscientists to consider factor analysis methods to extract and analyze the underlying brain activity. In this work, we consider two recent multi-subject factor analysis methods: the Shared Response Model and the Hierarchical Topographic Factor Analysis. We perform analytical, algorithmic, and code optimization to enable multi-node parallel implementations to scale. Single-node improvements result in 99χ and 2062x speedups on the two methods, and enables the processing of larger datasets. Our distributed implementations show strong scaling of 3.3x and 5.5χ respectively with 20 nodes on real datasets. We demonstrate weak scaling on a synthetic dataset with 1024 subjects, equivalent in size to the biggest fMRI dataset collected until now, on up to 1024 nodes and 32,768 cores. Michael J. Anderson, Mihai Capota, Javier Turek, Theodore L. Willke, Yida Wang 0003, Po-Hsuan Chen, Jeremy R. Manning, Peter J. Ramadge, Kenneth A. Norman |
IEEE BigData | 10 |
| 2014 | Statistical Computations Underlying the Dynamics of Memory UpdatingabstractPsychophysical and neurophysiological studies have suggested that memory is not simply a carbon copy of our experience: Memories are modified or new memories are formed depending on the dynamic structure of our experience, and specifically, on how gradually or abruptly the world changes. We present a statistical theory of memory formation in a dynamic environment, based on a nonparametric generalization of the switching Kalman filter. We show that this theory can qualitatively account for several psychophysical and neural phenomena, and present results of a new visual memory experiment aimed at testing the theory directly. Our experimental findings suggest that humans can use temporal discontinuities in the structure of the environment to determine when to form new memory traces. The statistical perspective we offer provides a coherent account of the conditions under which new experience is integrated into an old memory versus forming a new memory, and shows that memory formation depends on inferences about the underlying structure of our experience. Samuel Gershman, Angela Radulescu, Kenneth A. Norman, Yael Niv |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2012 | The Successor Representation and Temporal ContextabstractThe successor representation was introduced into reinforcement learning by Dayan ( 1993 ) as a means of facilitating generalization between states with similar successors. Although reinforcement learning in general has been used extensively as a model of psychological and neural processes, the psychological validity of the successor representation has yet to be explored. An interesting possibility is that the successor representation can be used not only for reinforcement learning but for episodic learning as well. Our main contribution is to show that a variant of the temporal context model (TCM; Howard & Kahana, 2002 ), an influential model of episodic memory, can be understood as directly estimating the successor representation using the temporal difference learning algorithm (Sutton & Barto, 1998 ). This insight leads to a generalization of TCM and new experimental predictions. In addition to casting a new normative light on TCM, this equivalence suggests a previously unexplored point of contact between different learning systems. Samuel Gershman, Christopher D. Moore, Michael T. Todd, Kenneth A. Norman, Per B. Sederberg |
Neural Comput. | 4 |
| 2009 | A Bayesian Analysis of Dynamics in Free RecallabstractWe develop a probabilistic model of human memory performance in free recall experiments. In these experiments, a subject first studies a list of words and then tries to recall them. To model these data, we draw on both previous psychological research and statistical topic models of text documents. We assume that memories are formed by assimilating the semantic meaning of studied words (represented as a distribution over topics) into a slowly changing latent context (represented in the same space). During recall, this context is reinstated and used as a cue for retrieving studied words. By conceptualizing memory retrieval as a dynamic latent variable model, we are able to use Bayesian inference to represent uncertainty and reason about the cognitive processes underlying memory. We present a particle filter algorithm for performing approximate posterior inference, and evaluate our model on the prediction of recalled words in experimental data. By specifying the model hierarchically, we are also able to capture inter-subject variability. Richard Socher, Samuel Gershman, Adler J. Perotte, Per B. Sederberg, David M. Blei, Kenneth A. Norman |
NIPS | 6 |
| 2006 | How Inhibitory Oscillations Can Train Neural Networks and Punish CompetitorsabstractWe present a new learning algorithm that leverages oscillations in the strength of neural inhibition to train neural networks. Raising inhibition can be used to identify weak parts of target memories, which are then strengthened. Conversely, lowering inhibition can be used to identify competitors, which are then weakened. To update weights, we apply the Contrastive Hebbian Learning equation to successive time steps of the network. The sign of the weight change equation varies as a function of the phase of the inhibitory oscillation. We show that the learning algorithm can memorize large numbers of correlated input patterns without collapsing and that it shows good generalization to test patterns that do not exactly match studied patterns. Kenneth A. Norman, Ehren L. Newman, Greg Detre, Sean M. Polyn |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2005 | Methods for reducing interference in the Complementary Learning Systems model: Oscillating inhibition and autonomous memory rehearsal
Kenneth A. Norman, Ehren L. Newman, Adler J. Perotte |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 1997 | A Hippocampal Model of Recognition Memory
Randall C. O'Reilly, Kenneth A. Norman, James L. McClelland |
NIPS | 2 |