Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timothy La Fond

dblp:99/8024 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 77% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.512021
DYMOND: DYnamic MOtif-NoDes Network Generative Model · WWW 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation
0.212014
Attributed graph models: modeling network structure with correlated attributes · WWW 2014
Data mining › statistical analysis
attribute correlation modeling
0.212014
Attributed graph models: modeling network structure with correlated attributes · WWW 2014
Data mining
network modeling
0.212014
Attributed graph models: modeling network structure with correlated attributes · WWW 2014
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis
0.112010
Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects · WWW 2010
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112010
Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects · WWW 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning
0.112014
Attributed graph models: modeling network structure with correlated attributes · WWW 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal motif analysis · 1.0generative graph modeling · 1.0kronecker product graph model · 0.4chung lu graph model · 0.4accept-reject sampling · 0.4temporal network analysis · 0.2randomization test · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Clustering Dynamic Graphs Using Time and Text Content
Timothy La Fond, Eisha Nathan, Hannah Nyholm, Van Emden Henson
ASONAM (2)1
2021 DYMOND: DYnamic MOtif-NoDes Network Generative Model
abstract
Motifs, which have been established as building blocks for network structure, move beyond pair-wise connections to capture longer-range correlations in connections and activity. In spite of this, there are few generative graph models that consider higher-order network structures and even fewer that focus on using motifs in models of dynamic graphs. Most existing generative models for temporal graphs strictly grow the networks via edge addition, and the models are evaluated using static graph structure metrics—which do not adequately capture the temporal behavior of the network. To address these issues, in this work we propose DYnamic MOtif-NoDes (DYMOND)—a generative model that considers (i) the dynamic changes in overall graph structure using temporal motif activity and (ii) the roles nodes play in motifs (e.g., one node plays the hub role in a wedge, while the remaining two act as spokes). We compare DYMOND to three dynamic graph generative model baselines on real-world networks and show that DYMOND performs better at generating graph structure and node behavior similar to the observed network. We also propose a new methodology to adapt graph structure metrics to better evaluate the temporal aspect of the network. These metrics take into account the changes in overall graph structure and the individual nodes’ behavior over time.
Giselle Zeno, Timothy La Fond, Jennifer Neville
WWW2
2018 Designing Size Consistent Statistics for Accurate Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Networks
abstract
An important task in network analysis is the detection of anomalous events in a network time series. These events could merely be times of interest in the network timeline or they could be examples of malicious activity or network malfunction. Hypothesis testing using network statistics to summarize the behavior of the network provides a robust framework for the anomaly detection decision process. Unfortunately, choosing network statistics that are dependent on confounding factors like the total number of nodes or edges can lead to incorrect conclusions (e.g., false positives and false negatives). In this article, we describe the challenges that face anomaly detection in dynamic network streams regarding confounding factors. We also provide two solutions to avoiding error due to confounding factors: the first is a randomization testing method that controls for confounding factors, and the second is a set of size-consistent network statistics that avoid confounding due to the most common factors, edge count and node count.
Timothy La Fond, Jennifer Neville, Brian Gallagher
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data1
2014 Attributed graph models: modeling network structure with correlated attributes
abstract
Online social networks have become ubiquitous to today's society and the study of data from these networks has improved our understanding of the processes by which relationships form. Research in statistical relational learning focuses on methods to exploit correlations among the attributes of linked nodes to predict user characteristics with greater accuracy. Concurrently, research on generative graph models has primarily focused on modeling network structure without attributes, producing several models that are able to replicate structural characteristics of networks such as power law degree distributions or community structure. However, there has been little work on how to generate networks with real-world structural properties and correlated attributes. In this work, we present the Attributed Graph Model (AGM) framework to jointly model network structure and vertex attributes. Our framework learns the attribute correlations in the observed network and exploits a generative graph model, such as the Kronecker Product Graph Model (KPGM) and Chung Lu Graph Model (CL), to compute structural edge probabilities. AGM then combines the attribute correlations with the structural probabilities to sample networks conditioned on attribute values, while keeping the expected edge probabilities and degrees of the input graph model. We outline an efficient method for estimating the parameters of AGM, as well as a sampling method based on Accept-Reject sampling to generate edges with correlated attributes. We demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of our AGM framework on two large real-world networks, showing that AGM scales to networks with hundreds of thousands of vertices, as well as having high attribute correlation.
Joseph J. Pfeiffer III, Sebastián Moreno, Timothy La Fond, Jennifer Neville, Brian Gallagher
WWW3
2010 Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects
abstract
Relational autocorrelation is ubiquitous in relational domains. This observed correlation between class labels of linked instances in a network (e.g., two friends are more likely to share political beliefs than two randomly selected people) can be due to the effects of two different social processes. If social influence effects are present, instances are likely to change their attributes to conform to their neighbor values. If homophily effects are present, instances are likely to link to other individuals with similar attribute values. Both these effects will result in autocorrelated attribute values. When analyzing static relational networks it is impossible to determine how much of the observed correlation is due each of these factors. However, the recent surge of interest in social networks has increased the availability of dynamic network data. In this paper, we present a randomization technique for temporal network data where the attributes and links change over time. Given data from two time steps, we measure the gain in correlation and assess whether a significant portion of this gain is due to influence and/or homophily. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method on semi-synthetic data and then apply the method to a real-world social networks dataset, showing the impact of both influence and homophily effects.
Timothy La Fond, Jennifer Neville
WWW1