Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergei V. Gusev

dblp:99/8139 · also Sergey V. Gusev · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7384-7892ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 86% Legged, aerial and field robots · 14%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › stabilization control
orbital stabilization
0.322015
Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015
Stable Walking Gaits for a Three-Link Planar Biped Robot With One Actuator · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.322015
Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015
Stable Walking Gaits for a Three-Link Planar Biped Robot With One Actuator · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212015
Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
non-prehensile manipulation planning
0.212015
Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.212013
Stable Walking Gaits for a Three-Link Planar Biped Robot With One Actuator · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › adaptive control
adaptive motion control
0.011998
Adaptive Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Vehicle · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.011998
Adaptive Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Vehicle · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
kinematic modeling
0.011998
Adaptive Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Vehicle · ICRA 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

virtual holonomic constraints · 0.4transverse linearization · 0.4trajectory planning · 0.2feedback stabilization · 0.0adaptive control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 On performing non-prehensile rolling manipulations: Stabilizing synchronous motions of Butterfly robots⋆
abstract
The paper explores the challenging task of performing a non-prehensile manipulation of several balls synchronously rolling on the curved hands of Butterfly robots. Each Butterfly robot represents a standard benchmark hardware setup, comprising a DC motor rotating a butterfly-shaped frame in a vertical plane, with a ball moving freely upon it, equipped with integrated computer vision, communication, programmable control, and computation interfaces. The combined dynamics of the considered system, consisting of N ≥ 2 such robots, is inherently underactuated, characterized by N active and N passive degrees of freedom, as well as N independent unilateral constraints that model the interactions between the frames and the balls, assuming no slipping. We focus on designing a model-based centralized feedback controller to achieve synchronized rotations of the balls. We assume the accuracy of our mathematical model and the feasibility of implementing a discretized version of the proposed continuous-time controller with a sufficiently small sampling time, that, in particular, is necessary for numerical differentiation. Relying on orbital stability of nominal periodic solution of the closed-loop system, we will experimentally check robustness to various inevitable challenges such as noises, disturbances, uncertainties, and communication delays. Hence, our concentration lies in designing an orbitally stabilizing controller for the underactuated models. The primary contribution is proposing one set of transverse coordinates, enabling transverse-linearization-based controller design, accompanied by pertinent closed-loop system analysis tools, thereby enhancing the efficacy of solving the manipulation task. Analytical and model-based arguments are validated through successful simulations and experiments conducted on two Butterfly robots, thereby emphasizing the validity and practicality of the proposed approach.
Maksim Surov, Stepan Pchelkin, Anton S. Shiriaev, Sergei V. Gusev, Leonid B. Freidovich
IROS4
2015 Case study in non-prehensile manipulation: planning and orbital stabilization of one-directional rollings for the "Butterfly" robot
abstract
We approach a problem of motion planning and stabilization for a benchmark example, known as the “Butterfly” robot. It was proposed as a benchmark challenge for developing systematic techniques for nonprehensile rolling manipulation. A dynamical model of the underactuated system with a non-unilateral contact is derived. The recently proposed methodologies, known as virtual-holonomic-constraints-based motion planning and transverse-linearization-based orbital stabilization, are appropriately extended to suit the task. Finally, the feasibility is demonstrated through a hardware implementation and an experimental validation of the concept.
Maksim Surov, Anton S. Shiriaev, Leonid B. Freidovich, Sergei V. Gusev, Leonid Paramonov
ICRA4
2013 Stable Walking Gaits for a Three-Link Planar Biped Robot With One Actuator
abstract
We consider a benchmark example of a three-link planar biped walker with torso, which is actuated in between the legs. The torso is thought to be kept upright by two identical torsional springs. The mathematical model reflects a three-degree-of-freedom mechanical system with impulse effects, which describe the impacts of the swing leg with the ground, and the aim is to induce stable limit-cycle walking on level ground. The main contribution is a novel systematic trajectory planning procedure for solving the problem of gait synthesis. The key idea is to find a system of ordinary differential equations for the functions describing a synchronization pattern for the time evolution of the generalized coordinates along a periodic motion. These functions, which are known as virtual holonomic constraints, are also used to compute an impulsive linear system that approximates the time evolution of the subset of coordinates that are transverse to the orbit of the continuous part of the periodic solution. This auxiliary system, which is known as transverse linearization, is used to design a nonlinear exponentially orbitally stabilizing feedback controller. The performance of the closed-loop system and its robustness with respect to various perturbations and uncertainties are illustrated via numerical simulations.
Pedro X. La Hera, Anton S. Shiriaev, Leonid B. Freidovich, Uwe Mettin, Sergei V. Gusev
IEEE Trans. Robotics5
1998 Adaptive Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Vehicle
abstract
The stabilization of the motion of a nonholonomic vehicle is considered. The control system developed has a two-level architecture. The lower control level operates within the kinematic model of the vehicle to stabilize its motion to a desired trajectory. The upper control level uses the dynamic model of the vehicle and stabilizes the feedback obtained on the lower control level. The operation of the control system is studied when unknown bounded disturbances affect the motion. The adaptive motion control is proposed to deal with uncertain dynamic parameters of the vehicle.
Sergei V. Gusev, I. A. Makarov, Igor E. Paromtchik, Vladimir A. Yakubovich, Christian Laugier
ICRA1