Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Rafael Odon de Alencar

dblp:99/9240 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 70% Information retrieval · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
aspect-based sentiment analysis
0.312018
A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews · WWW 2018
Information retrieval › text summarization
opinion summarization
0.312018
A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews · WWW 2018
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis
0.312018
A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews · WWW 2018
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.112018
A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews · WWW 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 0.3sentiment analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Feature-Oriented Sentiment Rating for Mobile App Reviews
abstract
In this paper, we propose a general framework that allows developers to filter, summarize and analyze user reviews written about applications on App Stores. Our framework extracts automatically relevant features from reviews of apps (e.g., information about functionalities, bugs, requirements, etc) and analyzes the sentiment associated with each of them. Our framework has three main building blocks, namely, (i) topic modeling, (ii) sentiment analysis and (iii) summarization interface. The topic modeling block aims at finding semantic topics from textual comments, extracting the target features based on the most relevant words of each discovered topic. The sentiment analysis block detects the sentiment associated with each discovered feature. The summarization interface provides to developers an intuitive visualization of the features (i.e., topics) and their associated sentiment, providing richer information than a 'star rating' strategy. Our evaluation shows that the topic modeling block is able to organize information provided by users in subcategories that facilitate the understanding of which features more positively/negatively impact the overall evaluation of the application. Regarding user satisfaction, we can observe that, in spite of the star rating being a good measure of evaluation, the Sentiment Analysis technique is more accurate in capturing the sentiment transmitted by the user by means of a comment.
Washington Cunha, Felipe Viegas, Rafael Odon de Alencar, Fernando Mourão, Thiago Salles, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho, Marcos André Gonçalves, Leonardo Rocha 0001
WWW3
2012 Sphere-M: An ontology capture method
abstract
Ontologies, since its formal definition in the 90's up to its effective usage with the advent of methods and processes from the Ontology Engineering, have received important attention in projects that demand the formalization of shared knowledge among applications and users. In this context, it is important to popularize and to make people able to create and use them. This article presents an ontology capture method, providing apparatus to conceptualize and identify the treated domain. The proposed method is capable to provide metrics and guidelines so that an ontology engineer can identify and organize the elements of a domain, finding fundamental ontological relations among them. A descriptive algorithm is shown to formalize the wished process and some examples are given to better exemplify the utilization of the proposed ontology capture method.
Rafael Odon de Alencar, Luis E. Zárate, Mark A. J. Song
SMC1