EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Josef Teichmann
dblp:99/9501
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0125-7484ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
model uncertainty |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NOMU: Neural Optimization-based Model Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NOMU: Neural Optimization-based Model Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
jump processes |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Jump Ordinary Differential Equations: Consistent Continuous-Time Prediction and Filtering · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Jump Ordinary Differential Equations: Consistent Continuous-Time Prediction and Filtering · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | NOMU: Neural Optimization-based Model Uncertainty · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.6loss function design · 0.6neural ODE · 0.5filtering · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | On the effectiveness of Randomized Signatures as Reservoir for Learning Rough DynamicsabstractMany finance, physics, and engineering phenomena are modeled by continuous-time dynamical systems driven by highly irregular (stochastic) inputs. A powerful tool to perform time series analysis in this context is rooted in rough path theory and leverages the so-called Signature Transform. This algorithm enjoys strong theoretical guarantees but is hard to scale to high-dimensional data. In this paper, we study a recently derived random projection variant called Randomized Signature, obtained using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. We provide an in-depth experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of the Randomized Signature approach, in an attempt to showcase the advantages of this reservoir to the community. Specifically, we find that this method is preferable to the truncated Signature approach and alternative deep learning techniques in terms of model complexity, training time, accuracy, robustness, and data hungriness. Enea Monzio Compagnoni, Anna Scampicchio, Luca Biggio, Antonio Orvieto, Thomas Hofmann 0001, Josef Teichmann |
IJCNN | 6 |
| 2022 | NOMU: Neural Optimization-based Model UncertaintyabstractWe study methods for estimating model uncertainty for neural networks (NNs) in regression. To isolate the effect of model uncertainty, we focus on a noiseless setting with scarce training data. We introduce five important desiderata regarding model uncertainty that any method should satisfy. However, we find that established benchmarks often fail to reliably capture some of these desiderata, even those that are required by Bayesian theory. To address this, we introduce a new approach for capturing model uncertainty for NNs, which we call Neural Optimization-based Model Uncertainty (NOMU). The main idea of NOMU is to design a network architecture consisting of two connected sub-NNs, one for model prediction and one for model uncertainty, and to train it using a carefully-designed loss function. Importantly, our design enforces that NOMU satisfies our five desiderata. Due to its modular architecture, NOMU can provide model uncertainty for any given (previously trained) NN if given access to its training data. We evaluate NOMU in various regressions tasks and noiseless Bayesian optimization (BO) with costly evaluations. In regression, NOMU performs at least as well as state-of-the-art methods. In BO, NOMU even outperforms all considered benchmarks. Jakob Heiss, Jakob Weissteiner, Hanna Wutte, Sven Seuken, Josef Teichmann |
ICML | 5 |
| 2022 | Discrete-Time Signatures and Randomness in Reservoir ComputingabstractA new explanation of the geometric nature of the reservoir computing (RC) phenomenon is presented. RC is understood in the literature as the possibility of approximating input-output systems with randomly chosen recurrent neural systems and a trained linear readout layer. Light is shed on this phenomenon by constructing what is called strongly universal reservoir systems as random projections of a family of state-space systems that generate Volterra series expansions. This procedure yields a state-affine reservoir system with randomly generated coefficients in a dimension that is logarithmically reduced with respect to the original system. This reservoir system is able to approximate any element in the fading memory filters class just by training a different linear readout for each different filter. Explicit expressions for the probability distributions needed in the generation of the projected reservoir system are stated, and bounds for the committed approximation error are provided. Christa Cuchiero, Lukas Gonon, Lyudmila Grigoryeva, Juan-Pablo Ortega, Josef Teichmann |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 5 |
| 2021 | Neural Jump Ordinary Differential Equations: Consistent Continuous-Time Prediction and Filtering
Calypso Herrera, Florian Krach, Josef Teichmann |
ICLR | 3 |