Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth S. Burnside

dblp:b/ESBurnside · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
29ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-6600-435XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 16 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 13Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 49% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction › cancer risk prediction
breast cancer risk prediction
0.212016
Structure-Leveraged Methods in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
cancer risk prediction
0.212016
Structure-Leveraged Methods in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.212016
Structure-Leveraged Methods in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.212014
Multiple Testing under Dependence via Semiparametric Graphical Models · ICML 2014
Mathematical optimization › multiple hypothesis testing
false discovery rate control
0.212014
Multiple Testing under Dependence via Semiparametric Graphical Models · ICML 2014
Mathematical optimization
multiple hypothesis testing
0.212014
Multiple Testing under Dependence via Semiparametric Graphical Models · ICML 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning
0.122007
Change of Representation for Statistical Relational Learning · IJCAI 2007
View Learning for Statistical Relational Learning: With an Application to Mammography · IJCAI 2005
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation change
0.112007
Change of Representation for Statistical Relational Learning · IJCAI 2007
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › x-ray imaging
mammography
0.012005
View Learning for Statistical Relational Learning: With an Application to Mammography · IJCAI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

group penalty · 0.5local FDR · 0.4benjamini-hochberg procedure · 0.4lasso · 0.2fusion penalty · 0.2fusion penalties · 0.2LASSO · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Improving breast cancer risk prediction by using demographic risk factors, abnormality features on mammograms and genetic variants
Shara Feld, Kaitlin M. Woo, Roxana Alexandridis, Yirong Wu, Jie Liu 0006, Peggy L. Peissig, Adedayo A. Onitilo, Jennifer Cox, David Page, Elizabeth S. Burnside
AMIA10
2016 Interpretable models to predict Breast Cancer
abstract
Several works in the literature use propositional (“black box”) approaches to generate prediction models. In this work we employ the Inductive Logic Programming technique, whose prediction model is based on first order rules, to the domain of breast cancer. These rules have the advantage of being interpretable and convenient to be used as a common language between the computer scientists and the medical experts. We also explore the relevance of some of variables usually collected to predict breast cancer. We compare our results with a propositional classifier that was considered best for the same dataset studied in this paper.
Pedro Ferreira 0002, Inês de Castro Dutra, Rogerio Salvini 0001, Elizabeth S. Burnside
BIBM4
2016 A Speech-to-Text Interface for MammoClass
abstract
Mammoclass is a web tool that allows users to enter a small set of variable values that describe a finding in a mammography, and produces a probability of this finding being malignant or benign. The tool requires that the user types in every variable a value in order to perform a prediction. In this work, we present a speech-to-text interface integrated to MammoClass that allows radiologists to speak up a mammography report instead of typing it in. This new MammoClass module can take audio content, transcribe it into written words, and automatically extract the variable values by applying a parser to the recognized text. Results of spoken mammography reports show that the same variables are extracted for both types of input: typed in or dictated text.
Ricardo Sousa Rocha, Pedro Ferreira 0002, Inês de Castro Dutra, Ricardo João Cruz Correia, Rogerio Salvini 0001, Elizabeth S. Burnside
CBMS6
2016 Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support
Selen Bozkurt, Francisco Gimenez, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Kemal Hakan Gülkesen, Daniel L. Rubin
J. Biomed. Informatics3
2016 Structure-Leveraged Methods in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
abstract
Predicting breast cancer risk has long been a goal of medical research in the pursuit of precision medicine. The goal of this study is to develop novel penalized methods to improve breast cancer risk prediction by leveraging structure information in electronic health records. We conducted a retrospective case- control study, garnering 49 mammography descriptors and 77 high- frequency/low-penetrance single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from an existing personalized medicine data repository. Structured mammography reports and breast imaging features have long been part of a standard electronic health record (EHR), and genetic markers likely will be in the near future. Lasso and its variants are widely used approaches to integrated learning and feature selection, and our methodological contribution is to incorporate the dependence structure among the features into these approaches. More specifically, we propose a new methodology by combining group penalty and $\ell^p$ ($1\leq p\leq2$) fusion penalty to improve breast cancer risk prediction, taking into account structure information in mammography descriptors and SNPs. We demonstrate that our method provides benefits that are both statistically significant and potentially significant to people's lives.
Yirong Wu, Ming Yuan 0001, David Page, Jie Liu 0006, Irene M. Ong, Peggy L. Peissig, Elizabeth S. Burnside
J. Mach. Learn. Res.8
2015 SkILL - A Stochastic Inductive Logic Learner
abstract
Probabilistic Inductive Logic Programming (PILP) is a relatively unexplored area of Statistical Relational Learning which extends classic Inductive Logic Programming (ILP). Within this scope, we introduce SkILL, a Stochastic Inductive Logic Learner, which takes probabilistic annotated data and produces First Order Logic (FOL) theories. Data in several domains such as medicine and bioinformatics have an inherent degree of uncertainty, and because SkILL can handle this type of data, the models produced for these areas are closer to reality. SkILL can then use probabilistic data to extract non-trivial knowledge from databases, and also address efficiency issues by introducing an efficient search strategy for finding hypotheses in PILP environments. SkILL's capabilities are demonstrated using a real world medical dataset in the breast cancer domain.
Joana Côrte-Real, Theofrastos Mantadelis, Inês de Castro Dutra, Ricardo Rocha 0001, Elizabeth S. Burnside
ICMLA5
2014 Learning Heterogeneous Hidden Markov Random Fields
abstract
Hidden Markov random fields (HMRFs) are conventionally assumed to be homogeneous in the sense that the potential functions are invariant across different sites. However in some biological applications, it is desirable to make HMRFs heterogeneous, especially when there exists some background knowledge about how the potential functions vary. We formally define heterogeneous HMRFs and propose an EM algorithm whose M-step combines a contrastive divergence learner with a kernel smoothing step to incorporate the background knowledge. Simulations show that our algorithm is effective for learning heterogeneous HMRFs and outperforms alternative binning methods. We learn a heterogeneous HMRF in a real-world study.
Jie Liu 0006, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page
AISTATS3
2014 A Novel Method to Assess Incompleteness of Mammography Report Content
Francisco Gimenez, Yirong Wu, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Daniel L. Rubin
AMIA3
2014 Comparing the Value of Mammographic Features and Genetic Variants in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction
Yirong Wu, Jie Liu 0006, David Page, Peggy L. Peissig, Catherine A. McCarty, Adedayo A. Onitilo, Elizabeth S. Burnside
AMIA7
2014 Multiple Testing under Dependence via Semiparametric Graphical Models
abstract
It has been shown that graphical models can be used to leverage the dependence in large-scale multiple testing problems with significantly improved performance (Sun & Cai, 2009; Liu et al., 2012). These graphical models are fully parametric and require that we know the parameterization of f1, the density function of the test statistic under the alternative hypothesis. However in practice, f1 is often heterogeneous, and cannot be estimated with a simple parametric distribution. We propose a novel semiparametric approach for multiple testing under dependence, which estimates f1 adaptively. This semiparametric approach exactly generalizes the local FDR procedure (Efron et al., 2001) and connects with the BH procedure (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995). A variety of simulations show that our semiparametric approach outperforms classical procedures which assume independence and the parametric approaches which capture dependence.
Jie Liu 0006, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page
ICML3
2014 Expert Bayes: Automatically Refining Manually Built Bayesian Networks
abstract
Bayesian network structures are usually built using only the data and starting from an empty network or from a naïve Bayes structure. Very often, in some domains, like medicine, a prior structure knowledge is already known. This structure can be automatically or manually refined in search for better performance models. In this work, we take Bayesian networks built by specialists and show that minor perturbations to this original network can yield better classifiers with a very small computational cost, while maintaining most of the intended meaning of the original model.
Ezilda Almeida, Pedro Ferreira 0002, Tiago T. V. Vinhoza, Inês de Castro Dutra, Paulo Vinicius Koerich Borges, Yirong Wu, Elizabeth S. Burnside
ICMLA7
2014 Support Vector Machines for Differential Prediction
Finn Kuusisto, Vítor Santos Costa, Houssam Nassif, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page, Jude W. Shavlik
ECML/PKDD (2)4
2013 Genetic Variants Improve Breast Cancer Risk Prediction on Mammograms
Jie Liu 0006, David Page, Houssam Nassif, Jude W. Shavlik, Peggy L. Peissig, Catherine A. McCarty, Adedayo A. Onitilo, Elizabeth S. Burnside
AMIA8
2013 Using Multidimensional Mutual Information to Prioritize Mammographic Features for Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Yirong Wu, David J. Vanness, Elizabeth S. Burnside
AMIA3
2013 Using machine learning to identify benign cases with non-definitive biopsy
abstract
When mammography reveals a suspicious finding, a core needle biopsy is usually recommended. In 5% to 15% of these cases, the biopsy diagnosis is non-definitive and a more invasive surgical excisional biopsy is recommended to confirm a diagnosis. The majority of these cases will ultimately be proven benign. The use of excisional biopsy for diagnosis negatively impacts patient quality of life and increases costs to the healthcare system. In this work, we employ a multi-relational machine learning approach to predict when a patient with a non-definitive core needle biopsy diagnosis need not undergo an excisional biopsy procedure because the risk of malignancy is low.
Finn Kuusisto, Inês de Castro Dutra, Houssam Nassif, Yirong Wu, Molly E. Klein, Heather B. Neuman, Jude W. Shavlik, Elizabeth S. Burnside
Healthcom8
2013 Score As You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling
Houssam Nassif, Finn Kuusisto, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page, Jude W. Shavlik, Vítor Santos Costa
ECML/PKDD (3)3
2012 Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, improving breast cancer diagnosis for older women
Houssam Nassif, Yirong Wu, David Page, Elizabeth S. Burnside
AMIA4
2012 Extracting BI-RADS features from Portuguese clinical texts
abstract
In this work we build the first BI-RADS parser for Portuguese free texts, modeled after existing approaches to extract BI-RADS features from English medical records. Our concept finder uses a semantic grammar based on the BIRADS lexicon and on iterative transferred expert knowledge. We compare the performance of our algorithm to manual annotation by a specialist in mammography. Our results show that our parser's performance is comparable to the manual method.
Houssam Nassif, Filipe Cunha, Inês C. Moreira, Ricardo João Cruz Correia, Eliana Sousa, David Page, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Inês de Castro Dutra
BIBM7
2012 Relational Differential Prediction
Houssam Nassif, Vítor Santos Costa, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page
ECML/PKDD (1)3
2012 Graphical-model Based Multiple Testing under Dependence, with Applications to Genome-wide Association Studies
Jie Liu 0006, Catherine A. McCarty, Peggy L. Peissig, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page
UAI5
2012 Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class
abstract
Because breast tissue composition partially predicts breast cancer risk, classification of mammography reports by breast tissue composition is important from both a scientific and clinical perspective. A method is presented for using the unstructured text of mammography reports to classify them into BI-RADS breast tissue composition categories. An algorithm that uses regular expressions to automatically determine BI-RADS breast tissue composition classes for unstructured mammography reports was developed. The algorithm assigns each report to a single BI-RADS composition class: 'fatty', 'fibroglandular', 'heterogeneously dense', 'dense', or 'unspecified'. We evaluated its performance on mammography reports from two different institutions. The method achieves >99% classification accuracy on a test set of reports from the Marshfield Clinic (Wisconsin) and Stanford University. Since large-scale studies of breast cancer rely heavily on breast tissue composition information, this method could facilitate this research by helping mine large datasets to correlate breast composition with other covariates.
Bethany Percha, Houssam Nassif, Jafi A. Lipson, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Daniel L. Rubin
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.4
2011 Predicting Malignancy from Mammography Findings and Surgical Biopsies
abstract
Breast screening is the regular examination of a woman's breasts to find breast cancer earlier. The sole exam approved for this purpose is mammography. Usually, findings are annotated through the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) created by the American College of Radiology. The BIRADS system determines a standard lexicon to be used by radiologists when studying each finding. Although the lexicon is standard, the annotation accuracy of the findings depends on the experience of the radiologist. Moreover, the accuracy of the classification of a mammography is also highly dependent on the expertise of the radiologist. A correct classification is paramount due to economical and humanitarian reasons. The main goal of this work is to produce machine learning models that predict the outcome of a mammography from a reduced set of annotated mammography findings. In the study we used a data set consisting of 348 consecutive breast masses that underwent image guided or surgical biopsy performed between October 2005 and December 2007 on 328 female subjects. The main conclusions are threefold: (1) automatic classification of a mammography, independent on information about mass density, can reach equal or better results than the classification performed by a physician; (2) mass density seems to be a good indicator of malignancy, as previous studies suggested; (3) a machine learning model can predict mass density with a quality as good as the specialist blind to biopsy, which is one of our main contributions. Our model can predict malignancy in the absence of the mass density attribute, since we can fill up this attribute using our mass density predictor.
Pedro Ferreira 0002, Nuno A. Fonseca, Inês de Castro Dutra, Ryan W. Woods, Elizabeth S. Burnside
BIBM5
2009 Boosting First-Order Clauses for Large, Skewed Data Sets
Louis Oliphant, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Jude W. Shavlik
ILP2
2007 Change of Representation for Statistical Relational Learning
Jesse Davis, Irene M. Ong, Jan Struyf, Elizabeth S. Burnside, David Page, Vítor Santos Costa
IJCAI4
2005 Knowledge Discovery from Structured Mammography Reports Using Inductive Logic Programming
Elizabeth S. Burnside, Jesse Davis, Vítor Santos Costa, Inês de Castro Dutra, Charles E. Kahn Jr., Jason Fine, David Page
AMIA1
2005 An Integrated Approach to Learning Bayesian Networks of Rules
Jesse Davis, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Inês de Castro Dutra, David Page, Vítor Santos Costa
ECML2
2005 View Learning for Statistical Relational Learning: With an Application to Mammography
Jesse Davis, Elizabeth S. Burnside, Inês de Castro Dutra, David Page, Raghu Ramakrishnan 0001, Vítor Santos Costa, Jude W. Shavlik
IJCAI2
2000 A Bayesian network for mammography
Elizabeth S. Burnside, Daniel L. Rubin, Ross D. Shachter
AMIA1
1999 Representing the Digital Anatomist Foundational Model as a Protege Ontology
Jin S. Hahn, Elizabeth S. Burnside, James F. Brinkley, Cornelius Rosse, Mark A. Musen
AMIA2