Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gosse Bouma

dblp:b/GosseBouma · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
32ranked-venue papers
12as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1106-3181ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 30 · 12 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 42% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 14%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.412020
UDapter: Language Adaptation for Truly Universal Dependency Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.212022
Hyper-X: A Unified Hypernetwork for Multi-Task Multilingual Transfer · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › domain adaptation for NLP
multilingual model adaptation
0.112020
UDapter: Language Adaptation for Truly Universal Dependency Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.112010
On Learning Subtypes of the Part-Whole Relation: Do Not Mix Your Seeds · ACL 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › formal ontology
part-whole relations
0.112010
On Learning Subtypes of the Part-Whole Relation: Do Not Mix Your Seeds · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.112010
On Learning Subtypes of the Part-Whole Relation: Do Not Mix Your Seeds · ACL 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › constraint-based grammar
unification-based grammar
0.011990
Defaults in Unification Grammar · ACL 1990
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
grammar formalisms
0.011990
Defaults in Unification Grammar · ACL 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adapter modules · 1.0hypernetwork · 0.6typological features · 0.4contextual parameter generation · 0.4seed-based learning · 0.1recursive constraints · 0.0delayed evaluation · 0.0feature structure unification · 0.0default logic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representations
abstract
Abstract Current open-domain neural semantics parsers show impressive performance. However, closer inspection of the symbolic meaning representations they produce reveals significant weaknesses: Sometimes they tend to merely copy character sequences from the source text to form symbolic concepts, defaulting to the most frequent word sense based in the training distribution. By leveraging the hierarchical structure of a lexical ontology, we introduce a novel compositional symbolic representation for concepts based on their position in the taxonomical hierarchy. This representation provides richer semantic information and enhances interpretability. We introduce a neural “taxonomical” semantic parser to utilize this new representation system of predicates, and compare it with a standard neural semantic parser trained on the traditional meaning representation format, employing a novel challenge set and evaluation metric for evaluation. Our experimental findings demonstrate that the taxonomical model, trained on much richer and complex meaning representations, is slightly subordinate in performance to the traditional model using the standard metrics for evaluation, but outperforms it when dealing with out-of-vocabulary concepts. We further show through neural model probing that training on a taxonomic representation enhances the model’s ability to learn the taxonomical hierarchy. This finding is encouraging for research in computational semantics that aims to combine data-driven distributional meanings with knowledge-based symbolic representations.
Xiao Zhang 0052, Gosse Bouma, Johan Bos
Comput. Linguistics2
2022 Hyper-X: A Unified Hypernetwork for Multi-Task Multilingual Transfer
abstract
Massively multilingual models are promising for transfer learning across tasks and languages.However, existing methods are unable to fully leverage training data when it is available in different task-language combinations.To exploit such heterogeneous supervision, we propose Hyper-X, a single hypernetwork that unifies multi-task and multilingual learning with efficient adaptation.This model generates weights for adapter modules conditioned on both tasks and language embeddings.By learning to combine task and language-specific knowledge, our model enables zero-shot transfer for unseen languages and task-language combinations.Our experiments on a diverse set of languages demonstrate that Hyper-X achieves the best or competitive gain when a mixture of multiple resources is available, while being on par with strong baselines in the standard scenario.Hyper-X is also considerably more efficient in terms of parameters and resources compared to methods that train separate adapters.Finally, Hyper-X consistently produces strong results in few-shot scenarios for new languages, showing the versatility of our approach beyond zero-shot transfer.1 NER en Pre-trained Model Pre-trained Model Fine-tuned Model ar tr Fine-tuned Model ar tr POS en Single-Task Pre-trained Model Fine-tuned Model ar tr ar tr NER POS en en Multi-Task Pre-trained Model Fine-tuned Model tr NER POS ar tr NER ar POS en en Mixed-Language Multi-Task Anne Lauscher, Vinit Ravishankar, Ivan Vulić, and Goran Glavaš.2020a.From Zero to Hero: On the Limitations of Zero-Shot
Ahmet Üstün, Arianna Bisazza, Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord, Sebastian Ruder
EMNLP3
2022 PoS Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsing of West Frisian
abstract
We present a lemmatizer/PoS tagger/dependency parser for West Frisian using a corpus of 44,714 words in 3,126 sentences that were annotated according to the guidelines of Universal Dependencies version 2. PoS tags were assigned to words by using a Dutch PoS tagger that was applied to a Dutch word-by-word translation, or to sentences of a Dutch parallel text. Best results were obtained when using word-by-word translations that were created by using the previous version of the Frisian translation program Oersetter. Morphologic and syntactic annotations were generated on the basis of a Dutch word-by-word translation as well. The performance of the lemmatizer/tagger/annotator when it was trained using default parameters was compared to the performance that was obtained when using the parameter values that were used for training the LassySmall UD 2.5 corpus. We study the effects of different hyperparameter settings on the accuracy of the annotation pipeline. The Frisian lemmatizer/PoS tagger/dependency parser is released as a web app and as a web service.
Wilbert Heeringa, Gosse Bouma, Martha Hofman, Jelle Brouwer, Eduard Drenth, Jan Wijffels, Hans Van de Velde
LREC2
2022 UDapter: Typology-based Language Adapters for Multilingual Dependency Parsing and Sequence Labeling
abstract
Abstract Recent advances in multilingual language modeling have brought the idea of a truly universal parser closer to reality. However, such models are still not immune to the “curse of multilinguality”: Cross-language interference and restrained model capacity remain major obstacles. To address this, we propose a novel language adaptation approach by introducing contextual language adapters to a multilingual parser. Contextual language adapters make it possible to learn adapters via language embeddings while sharing model parameters across languages based on contextual parameter generation. Moreover, our method allows for an easy but effective integration of existing linguistic typology features into the parsing model. Because not all typological features are available for every language, we further combine typological feature prediction with parsing in a multi-task model that achieves very competitive parsing performance without the need for an external prediction system for missing features. The resulting parser, UDapter, can be used for dependency parsing as well as sequence labeling tasks such as POS tagging, morphological tagging, and NER. In dependency parsing, it outperforms strong monolingual and multilingual baselines on the majority of both high-resource and low-resource (zero-shot) languages, showing the success of the proposed adaptation approach. In sequence labeling tasks, our parser surpasses the baseline on high resource languages, and performs very competitively in a zero-shot setting. Our in-depth analyses show that adapter generation via typological features of languages is key to this success.1
Ahmet Üstün, Arianna Bisazza, Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord
Comput. Linguistics3
2020 UDapter: Language Adaptation for Truly Universal Dependency Parsing
abstract
Recent advances in multilingual dependency parsing have brought the idea of a truly universal parser closer to reality.However, crosslanguage interference and restrained model capacity remain major obstacles.To address this, we propose a novel multilingual task adaptation approach based on contextual parameter generation and adapter modules.This approach enables to learn adapters via language embeddings while sharing model parameters across languages.It also allows for an easy but effective integration of existing linguistic typology features into the parsing network.The resulting parser, UDapter, outperforms strong monolingual and multilingual baselines on the majority of both high-resource and lowresource (zero-shot) languages, showing the success of the proposed adaptation approach.Our in-depth analyses show that soft parameter sharing via typological features is key to this success.1
Ahmet Üstün, Arianna Bisazza, Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord
EMNLP (1)3
2014 Preface: 17th International conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB 2012)
Gosse Bouma, Valerio Basile, Ashwin Ittoo, Elisabeth Métais, Hans Wortmann
Data Knowl. Eng.1
2013 Minimally-supervised extraction of domain-specific part-whole relations using Wikipedia as knowledge-base
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma
Data Knowl. Eng.2
2013 Minimally-supervised learning of domain-specific causal relations using an open-domain corpus as knowledge base
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma
Data Knowl. Eng.2
2013 Term extraction from sparse, ungrammatical domain-specific documents
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2012 Multi-Layer Discourse Annotation of a Dutch Text Corpus
Gisela Redeker, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Nynke van der Vliet, Gosse Bouma, Markus Egg
LREC4
2012 Classifying Image Galleries into a Taxonomy Using Metadata and Wikipedia
Gerwin Kramer, Gosse Bouma, Dennis Hendriksen, Mathijs Homminga
NLDB2
2012 Every document has a geographical scope
Geoffrey Andogah, Gosse Bouma, John Nerbonne
Data Knowl. Eng.2
2011 Easy Educational Literature Comprehension - Applying TermPedia to Information Retrieval Knowledge Domain
Proscovia Olango, Gosse Bouma, Henny Klein
CSEDU (1)2
2011 Extracting Explicit and Implicit Causal Relations from Sparse, Domain-Specific Texts
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma
NLDB2
2010 On Learning Subtypes of the Part-Whole Relation: Do Not Mix Your Seeds
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma
ACL2
2010 Cross-lingual Ontology Alignment using EuroWordNet and Wikipedia
Gosse Bouma
LREC1
2010 Extracting Meronymy Relationships from Domain-Specific, Textual Corporate Databases
Ashwin Ittoo, Gosse Bouma, Laura Maruster, Hans Wortmann
NLDB2
2008 A Coreference Corpus and Resolution System for Dutch
Iris Hendrickx, Gosse Bouma, Frederik Coppens, Walter Daelemans, Véronique Hoste, Geert Kloosterman, Anne-Marie Mineur, Joeri Van Der Vloet, Jean-Luc Verschelde
LREC2
2007 SWHi System Description: A Case Study in Information Retrieval, Inference, and Visualization in the Semantic Web
Ismail Fahmi, Junte Zhang, Henk Ellermann, Gosse Bouma
ESWC4
2004 A New Approach to the Corpus-based Statistical Investigation of Hungarian Multi-word Lexemes
Balázs Kis, Begoña Villada, Gosse Bouma, Gábor Ugray, Tamás Bíró, Gábor Pohl, John Nerbonne
LREC3
2003 Finite state methods for hyphenation
abstract
Hyphenation is the task of identifying potential hyphenation points inwords. In this paper, three finite-state hyphenation methods for Dutch are presented and compared in terms of accuracy and size of the resulting automata.
Gosse Bouma
Nat. Lang. Eng.1
2002 Querying Dependency Treebanks in XML
Gosse Bouma, Geert Kloosterman
LREC1
1999 Robust grammatical analysis for spoken dialogue systems
abstract
We argue that grammatical analysis is a viable alternative to concept spotting for processing spoken input in a practical spoken dialogue system. We discuss the structure of the grammar, and a model for robust parsing which combines linguistic sources of information and statistical sources of information. We discuss test results suggesting that grammatical processing allows fast and accurate processing of spoken input.
Gertjan van Noord, Gosse Bouma, Rob Koeling, Mark-Jan Nederhof
Nat. Lang. Eng.2
1998 Intergouvermental language policy for duth and the language and speech technology infrastructure
Gosse Bouma, Ineke Schuurman
LREC1
1994 Constraint-Based Categorical Grammar
abstract
We propose a generalization of Categorial Grammar in which lexical categories are defined by means of recursive constraints. In particular, the introduction of relational constraints allows one to capture the effects of (recursive) lexical rules in a computationally attractive manner. We illustrate the linguistic merits of the new approach by showing how it accounts for the syntax of Dutch cross-serial dependencies and the position and scope of adjuncts in such constructions. Delayed evaluation is used to process grammars containing recursive constraints.
Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord
ACL1
1994 Adjuncts and the Processing of Lexical Rules
Gertjan van Noord, Gosse Bouma
COLING2
1993 Head-driven Parsing for Lexicalist Grammars: Experimental Results
Gosse Bouma, Gertjan van Noord
EACL1
1992 A Lexicalist Account of Icelandic Case Marking
Gosse Bouma
COLING1
1992 Feature Structures and Nonmonotonicity
Gosse Bouma
Comput. Linguistics1
1991 Prediction in Chart Parsing Algorithms for Categorial Unification Grammar
Gosse Bouma
EACL1
1990 Defaults in Unification Grammar
abstract
Incorporation of defaults in grammar formalisms is important for reasons of linguistic adequacy and grammar organization. In this paper we present an algorithm for handling default information in unification grammar. The algorithm specifies a logical operation on feature structures, merging with the non-default structure only those parts of the default feature structure which are not constrained by the non-default structure. We present various linguistic applications of default unification.
Gosse Bouma
ACL1
1989 Efficient Processing Of Flexible Categorial Grammar
Gosse Bouma
EACL1