Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joost Breuker

dblp:b/JoostBreuker · also J. A. Breuker · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 6 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning
0.012000
Model-based reasoning about learner behaviour · Artif. Intell. 2000
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › normative reasoning
legal reasoning
0.011999
Legal modeling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1999
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge engineering
0.011998
TheCommonKADS library in perspective · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › diagnosis
model-based diagnosis
0.012000
Model-based reasoning about learner behaviour · Artif. Intell. 2000
Automated reasoning and model checking
automated reasoning
0.011999
Legal modeling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1999
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.011998
TheCommonKADS library in perspective · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge acquisition
0.021987
A Case Study in Structured Knowledge Acquisition · IJCAI 1985
Structured Analysis of Knowledge · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge base
knowledge base management
0.011987
Structured Analysis of Knowledge · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
user modeling
0.011987
A Shell for Intelligent Help Systems · IJCAI 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cognitive science · 0.3legal modeling · 0.0qualitative simulation · 0.0GDE algorithm · 0.0on-line system · 0.0ON-LINE system · 0.0CommonKADS library · 0.0shell design · 0.0structured analysis · 0.0case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 A cognitive science perspective on knowledge acquisition
Joost Breuker
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2010 Making Sense of Design Patterns
Rinke Hoekstra, Joost Breuker
EKAW2
2008 Polishing Diamonds in OWL 2
Rinke Hoekstra, Joost Breuker
EKAW2
2008 Automated Legal Assessment in OWL 2
abstract
In this paper we describe HARNESS, a legal knowledge-based system that is developed in the context of ESTRELLA. This system is primarily aimed at the task of legal assessment, i.e. determining whether some case violates and/or complies with legal norms. We explain how the sound and complete reasoning provided by OWL-DL reasoners is exploited by a careful representation of norms, using examples from law on taxation of gifts. We describe a plugin for Protégé 4 that enables easy experimentation for this system, powered by Pellet.
Saskia van de Ven, Joost Breuker, Rinke Hoekstra, Lars Wortel
JURIX2
2006 Developing Content for LKIF: Ontologies and Frameworks for Legal Reasoning
Joost Breuker, Alexander Boer, Rinke Hoekstra, Kasper van den Berg
JURIX1
2000 Model-based reasoning about learner behaviour
abstract
Automated handling of tutoring and training functions in educational systems requires the availability of articulate domain models. In this article we further develop the application of qualitative models for this purpose. A framework is presented that defines a key role for qualitative models as interactive simulations of the subject matter. Within this framework our research focuses on automating the diagnosis of learner behaviour. We show how a qualitative simulation model of the subject matter can be reformulated to fit the requirements of general diagnostic engines such as GDE. It turns out that, due to the specific characteristics of such models, additional structuring is required to produce useful diagnostic results. A set of procedures is presented that automatically maps detailed simulation models into a hierarchy of aggregated models by hiding non-essential details and chunking chains of causal dependencies. The result is a highly structured subject matter model that enables the diagnosis of learner behaviour by means of an adapted version of the GDE algorithm. An experiment has been conducted that shows the viability of the approach taken, i.e., given the output of a qualitative simulator the procedures we have developed automatically generate a structured subject matter model and subsequently use this model to successfully diagnoses learner behaviour.
Kees de Koning, Bert Bredeweg, Joost Breuker, Bob J. Wielinga
Artif. Intell.3
1999 Generating exception structures for legal information serving
Radboud Winkels, D. J. B. Bosscher, A. W. F. Boer, Joost Breuker
ICAIL4
1999 Legal modeling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE
André Valente, Joost Breuker, Bob Brouwer
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2
1998 TheCommonKADS library in perspective
André Valente, Joost Breuker, Walter Van de Velde
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2
1995 ON-LINE: An Architecture for Modelling Legal Information
abstract
Article ON-LINE: an architecture for modelling legal information Share on Authors: André Valente Department of Computer Science and Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Computer Science and Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsView Profile , Joost Breuker Department of Computer Science and Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Computer Science and Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsView Profile Authors Info & Claims ICAIL '95: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and lawMay 1995 Pages 307–315https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222265Online:24 May 1995Publication History 12citation403DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations12Total Downloads403Last 12 Months9Last 6 weeks4 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
André Valente, Joost Breuker
ICAIL2
1992 Generality Watching: ITS Caught between Science and Engineering
Joost Breuker
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
1992 Modelling Expertise for Educational Purposes
Radboud Winkels, Joost Breuker
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
1991 Separating World and Regulation Knowledge: Where is the Logic
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Separating world and regulation knowledge: where is the logic Authors: Joost Breuker Department of Computer Science and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ Amsterdam Department of Computer Science and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ AmsterdamView Profile , Nienke den Haan Department of Computer Science and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ Amsterdam Department of Computer Science and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 72, 1012 CZ AmsterdamView Profile Authors Info & Claims ICAIL '91: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and lawMay 1991 Pages 92–97https://doi.org/10.1145/112646.112658Published:01 May 1991Publication History 18citation311DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations18Total Downloads311Last 12 Months17Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Joost Breuker, Nienke den Haan
ICAIL1
1988 StatCons: Knowledge Acquisition in a Complex Domain
Paul de Greef, Joost Breuker, Guus Schreiber, Jan Wielemaker
ECAI2
1988 Research on HELP-Systems: Empirical Study and Model Construction
Jacobijn Sandberg, Joost Breuker, Radboud Winkels
ECAI2
1987 A Shell for Intelligent Help Systems
Joost Breuker, Radboud Winkels, Jacobijn Sandberg
IJCAI1
1987 Structured Analysis of Knowledge
S. A. Hayward, Bob J. Wielinga, Joost Breuker
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.3
1986 Models of Expertise
Bob J. Wielinga, Joost Breuker
ECAI2
1985 A Case Study in Structured Knowledge Acquisition
Paul de Greef, Joost Breuker
IJCAI2
1984 Interpretation of Verbal Data for Knowledge Acquisition
Bob J. Wielinga, Joost Breuker
ECAI2