Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jolyon Clulow
dblp:c/JClulow
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 51% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 34% Privacy and data protection · 15% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance
data use policy enforcement |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Cryptographic Processors-A Survey · Proc. IEEE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Fast Exclusion of Errant Devices from Vehicular NetworksabstractVehicular networks, in which cars communicate wirelessly to exchange information on traffic conditions, offer a promising way to improve road safety. Yet ensuring the correct functioning of such a system is essential: malicious or faulty devices transmitting inaccurate messages could trigger accidents. Therefore, any errant device, along with the messages it generates, must be identified and ignored as quickly as possible. This task is especially challenging because traditional approaches to revoking credentials use a central authority, causing long delays during which the network is vulnerable. To eliminate this window of vulnerability, we propose that vehicles locally decide whether to exclude errant devices. We describe two ways of doing so: first, LEAVE, an existing protocol which allows devices to vote by exchanging signed claims of impropriety, and second, Stinger, a new protocol where a device unilaterally removes a misbehaving neighbor by agreeing to limit its own participation. We provide detailed simulations that offer insight into the protocols' operations in the context of vehicular networks and enable a powerful comparison between the strategies. We compare the security and performance properties of LEAVE and Stinger while varying attacker capabilities, traffic conditions, and the accuracy of the misbehavior detection mechanisms. We identify several interesting trade-offs: Stinger is significantly faster than LEAVE at removing errant devices, but LEAVE excludes fewer good devices when the attacker has compromised several devices simultaneously; LEAVE is better at handling false positives, but Stinger scales better when the traffic density increases. As a result, we conclude by outlining a combined protocol that balances the security and performance characteristics of both strategies. Tyler Moore 0001, Maxim Raya, Jolyon Clulow, Panagiotis Papadimitratos, Ross J. Anderson, Jean-Pierre Hubaux |
SECON | 3 |
| 2007 | Secure Path-Key Revocation for Symmetric Key Pre-distribution Schemes in Sensor Networks
Tyler Moore 0001, Jolyon Clulow |
SEC | 2 |
| 2006 | Integrity of intention (a theory of types for security APIs)
Mike Bond, Jolyon Clulow |
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. | 2 |
| 2006 | Cryptographic Processors-A SurveyabstractTamper-resistant cryptographic processors are becoming the standard way to enforce data-usage policies. Their origins lie with military cipher machines and PIN processing in banking payment networks, expanding in the 1990s into embedded applications: token vending machines for prepayment electricity and mobile phone credit. Major applications such as GSM mobile phone identification and pay TV set-top boxes have pushed low-cost cryptoprocessors toward ubiquity. In the last five years, dedicated crypto chips have been embedded in devices such as game console accessories and printer ink cartridges, to control product and accessory after markets. The "Trusted Computing" initiative will soon embed cryptoprocessors in PCs so they can identify each other remotely. This paper surveys the range of applications of tamper-resistant hardware and the array of attack and defense mechanisms which have evolved in the tamper-resistance arms race. Ross J. Anderson, Mike Bond, Jolyon Clulow, Sergei P. Skorobogatov |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |
| 2003 | On the Security of PKCS#11
Jolyon Clulow |
CHES | 1 |