Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noam Chomsky
dblp:c/NChomsky
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-3632-2461ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages
formal grammars |
0.0 | 2 | 1959 | On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars · Inf. Control. 1959 Three models for the description of language · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956 |
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
phrase structure grammars |
0.0 | 2 | 1959 | A Note on Phrase Structure Grammars · Inf. Control. 1959 Three models for the description of language · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956 |
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
generative capacity |
0.0 | 1 | 1956 | Three models for the description of language · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956 |
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
transformational grammars |
0.0 | 1 | 1956 | Three models for the description of language · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite-state markov process · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Governing Board Symposium The Biology of Language in the 21st Century
Noam Chomsky, David Poeppel, Patricia S. Churchland, Elissa L. Newport |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2007 | SymposiumonMargaret Boden, Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science , Oxford (2006) two volumes
Noam Chomsky |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1959 | On Certain Formal Properties of Grammars
Noam Chomsky |
Inf. Control. | 1 |
| 1959 | A Note on Phrase Structure Grammars
Noam Chomsky |
Inf. Control. | 1 |
| 1958 | Finite State Languages
Noam Chomsky, George A. Miller |
Inf. Control. | 1 |
| 1956 | Three models for the description of languageabstractWe investigate several conceptions of linguistic structure to determine whether or not they can provide simple and "revealing" grammars that generate all of the sentences of English and only these. We find that no finite-state Markov process that produces symbols with transition from state to state can serve as an English grammar. Furthermore, the particular subclass of such processes that producen-order statistical approximations to English do not come closer, with increasingn, to matching the output of an English grammar. We formalize-the notions of "phrase structure" and show that this gives us a method for describing language which is essentially more powerful, though still representable as a rather elementary type of finite-state process. Nevertheless, it is successful only when limited to a small subset of simple sentences. We study the formal properties of a set of grammatical transformations that carry sentences with phrase structure into new sentences with derived phrase structure, showing that transformational grammars are processes of the same elementary type as phrase-structure grammars; that the grammar of English is materially simplified if phrase structure description is limited to a kernel of simple sentences from which all other sentences are constructed by repeated transformations; and that this view of linguistic structure gives a certain insight into the use and understanding of language. Noam Chomsky |
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 1953 | Systems of Syntactic AnalysisabstractDuring the past several decades, linguists have developed and applied widely techniques which enable them, to a considerable extent, to determine and state the structure of natural languages without semantic reference. It is of interest to inquire seriously into the formality of linguistic method and the adequacy of whatever part of it can be made purely formal, and to examine the possibilities of applying it, as has occasionally been suggested, to a wider range of problems. In order to pursue these aims it is first necessary to reconstruct carefully the set of procedures by which the linguist derives the statements of a linguistic grammar from the behaviour of language users, distinguishing clearly between formal and experimental in such a way that grammatical notions, appearing as definienda in a constructional system, will be formally derivable for any language from a fixed sample of linguistic material upon which the primitives of the system are experimentally defined. The present paper will be an attempt to formalize a certain part of the linguist's generalized syntax language. From another point of view, this paper is an attempt to develop an adequate notion of syntactic category within an inscriptional nominalistic framework. The inscriptional approach seems natural for linguistics, particularly in view of the fact that an adequate extension of the results of this paper will have to deal with the problem of homonymity, i.e., with a statement of the conditions under which tokens of the same type must be assigned to different syntactic classes. Noam Chomsky |
J. Symb. Log. | 1 |