Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergey Chernov 0001

dblp:c/SergeyChernov · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search engines
desktop search
0.222010
Enterprise and desktop search · WWW 2010
Task detection for activity-based desktop search · SIGIR 2008
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object recognition
landmark recognition
0.112011
GuideMe! The World of sights in your pocket · ICDE 2011
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
enterprise search
0.112010
Enterprise and desktop search · WWW 2010
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › mobile computing
mobile applications
0.012011
GuideMe! The World of sights in your pocket · ICDE 2011
Information retrieval
ranking
0.012010
Enterprise and desktop search · WWW 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

landmark finding from photos · 0.2activity log mining · 0.2ranking algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 GuideMe! The World of sights in your pocket
abstract
Web 2.0 applications are a rich source of multimedia resources, that describe sights, events, whether conditions, traffic situations and other relevant objects along the user's route. Compared to static sight descriptions, Web 2.0 resources can provide up-to-date visual information, which has been found important or interesting by the other users. Some algorithms have been suggested recently for the landmark finding problem from photos. Still, if users want related videos or background information about a particular place of interest it is necessary to contact different social platforms or general search engines. In this paper we present GuideMe! - a mobile application that automatically identifies landmark tags from Flickr groups and gathers relevant sightseeing resources from various Web 2.0 social platforms.
Sergej Zerr, Kerstin Bischoff, Sergey Chernov 0001
ICDE3
2010 Enterprise and desktop search
abstract
With the growing amount of information on users' desktops and increasing scale and complexity of intranets, Enterprise and Desktop Search are becoming two increasingly important Information Retrieval applications. While the challenges arising there are not completely different from those that the web community has faced for years, advanced web search solutions are often unable to address them properly. In this tutorial we give a research prospective on distinctive features of both Enterprise and Desktop Search, explain typical search scenarios, and review existing ranking techniques and algorithms.
Pavel A. Dmitriev, Pavel Serdyukov, Sergey Chernov 0001
WWW3
2009 Personalized social search based on the user's social network
abstract
This work investigates personalized social search based on the user's social relations -- search results are re-ranked according to their relations with individuals in the user's social network. We study the effectiveness of several social network types for personalization: (1) Familiarity-based network of people related to the user through explicit familiarity connection; (2) Similarity-based network of people "similar" to the user as reflected by their social activity; (3) Overall network that provides both relationship types. For comparison we also experiment with Topic-based personalization that is based on the user's related terms, aggregated from several social applications. We evaluate the contribution of the different personalization strategies by an off-line study and by a user survey within our organization. In the off-line study we apply bookmark-based evaluation, suggested recently, that exploits data gathered from a social bookmarking system to evaluate personalized retrieval. In the on-line study we analyze the feedback of 240 employees exposed to the alternative personalization approaches. Our main results show that both in the off-line study and in the user survey social network based personalization significantly outperforms non-personalized social search. Additionally, as reflected by the user survey, all three SN-based strategies significantly outperform the Topic-based strategy.
David Carmel, Naama Zwerdling, Ido Guy, Shila Ofek-Koifman, Nadav Har'El, Inbal Ronen, Erel Uziel, Sivan Yogev, Sergey Chernov 0001
CIKM9
2009 Exploiting Flickr Tags and Groups for Finding Landmark Photos
Rabeeh Ayaz Abbasi, Sergey Chernov 0001, Wolfgang Nejdl, Raluca Paiu, Steffen Staab
ECIR2
2008 Task detection for activity-based desktop search
abstract
The desktop search tools provide powerful query capabilities and result presentation techniques. However, they do not take the user context into account. We propose to exploit collected information about user activities with desktop files and applications for activity-based desktop search. When I prepare for a project review and type in a search box the name of a colleague, I expect to find her last deliverable draft, but not her email with a paper review or our joint conference presentation. Ideally, the desktop search system should be able to infer my current task from the logs of my previous activities and present task-specific search results.
Sergey Chernov 0001
SIGIR1
2007 Building a Desktop Search Test-Bed
Sergey Chernov 0001, Pavel Serdyukov, Paul-Alexandru Chirita, Gianluca Demartini, Wolfgang Nejdl
ECIR1
2007 Enhancing Expert Search Through Query Modeling
Pavel Serdyukov, Sergey Chernov 0001, Wolfgang Nejdl
ECIR2