Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhiyuan Chen 0001

dblp:c/ZhiyuanChen · also Zhiyuan (Brett) Chen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 9 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 54% Learning paradigms · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Data mining · 48% Web and social media mining · 30% Information retrieval · 22%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.542016
Mining topics in documents: standing on the shoulders of big data · KDD 2014
Leveraging Multi-Domain Prior Knowledge in Topic Models · IJCAI 2013
Mining Aspect-Specific Opinion using a Holistic Lifelong Topic Model · WWW 2016
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.422016
Targeted Topic Modeling for Focused Analysis · KDD 2016
Topic Modeling using Topics from Many Domains, Lifelong Learning and Big Data · ICML 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.422016
Mining Aspect-Specific Opinion using a Holistic Lifelong Topic Model · WWW 2016
Exploiting Domain Knowledge in Aspect Extraction · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
aspect extraction
0.422014
Aspect Extraction with Automated Prior Knowledge Learning · ACL (1) 2014
Exploiting Domain Knowledge in Aspect Extraction · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
aspect-based sentiment analysis
0.212016
Mining Aspect-Specific Opinion using a Holistic Lifelong Topic Model · WWW 2016
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension
0.212016
Lifelong Machine Learning and Computer Reading the Web · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › document processing
document analysis
0.212016
Targeted Topic Modeling for Focused Analysis · KDD 2016
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
0.212016
Identifying Search Keywords for Finding Relevant Social Media Posts · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer
0.212014
Mining topics in documents: standing on the shoulders of big data · KDD 2014
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning
0.212014
Topic Modeling using Topics from Many Domains, Lifelong Learning and Big Data · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.212014
Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning · ICDM 2014
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.212014
Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning · ICDM 2014
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.212014
Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning · ICDM 2014
Web and social media mining › online review analysis
fake review detection
0.212014
Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning · ICDM 2014
Information retrieval
query formulation
0.112016
Identifying Search Keywords for Finding Relevant Social Media Posts · AAAI 2016
Data mining
text mining
0.112016
Targeted Topic Modeling for Focused Analysis · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 0.7knowledge-based topic model · 0.4heterogeneous information network · 0.4collective classification · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4topic model · 0.4transfer learning · 0.2targeted aspect analysis · 0.2statistical keyword extraction · 0.2manual iterative search · 0.2lifelong machine learning · 0.2knowledge accumulation · 0.2prior knowledge learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Identifying Search Keywords for Finding Relevant Social Media Posts
abstract
In almost any application of social media analysis, the user is interested in studying a particular topic or research question. Collecting posts or messages relevant to the topic from a social media source is a necessary step. Due to the huge size of social media sources (e.g., Twitter and Facebook), one has to use some topic keywords to search for possibly relevant posts. However, gathering a good set of keywords is a very tedious and time-consuming task. It often involves a lengthy iterative process of searching and manual reading. In this paper, we propose a novel technique to help the user identify topical search keywords. Our experiments are carried out on identifying such keywords for five (5) real-life application topics to be used for searching relevant tweets from the Twitter API. The results show that the proposed method is highly effective.
Shuai Wang 0020, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001, Sherry Emery
AAAI2
2016 Discovering Correspondence of Sentiment Words and Aspects
Geli Fei, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001
CICLing (2)2
2016 Lifelong Machine Learning and Computer Reading the Web
abstract
This tutorial introduces Lifelong Machine Learning (LML) and Machine Reading. The core idea of LML is to learn continuously and accumulate the learned knowledge, and to use the knowledge to help future learning, which is perhaps the hallmark of human learning and human intelligence. By us- ing prior knowledge seamlessly and effortlessly, we humans can learn without a lot of training data, but current machine learning algorithms tend to need a huge amount of training data. LML aims to mimic this human capability. Machine Reading is a research area with the goal of building systems to read natural language text. Among different approaches employed in Machine Reading, this tutorial focuses on projects and approaches that use the idea of LML. Most current machine learning (ML) algorithms learn in isolation. They are designed to address a specific problem using a single dataset. That is, given a dataset, an ML algorithm is executed on the dataset to build a model. Although this type of isolated learning is very useful, it does not have the ability to accumulate past knowledge and to make use of the knowledge for future learning, which we believe are critical for the future of machine learning and data mining. LML aims to design and develop computational systems and algorithms with this capability, i.e., to learn as humans do in a lifelong manner.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Estevam Hruschka, Bing Liu 0001
KDD1
2016 Targeted Topic Modeling for Focused Analysis
abstract
One of the overarching tasks of document analysis is to find what topics people talk about. One of the main techniques for this purpose is topic modeling. So far many models have been proposed. However, the existing models typically perform full analysis on the whole data to find all topics. This is certainly useful, but in practice we found that the user almost always also wants to perform more detailed analyses on some specific aspects, which we refer to as targets (or targeted aspects). Current full-analysis models are not suitable for such analyses as their generated topics are often too coarse and may not even be on target. For example, given a set of tweets about e-cigarette, one may want to find out what topics under discussion are specifically related to children. Likewise, given a collection of online reviews about a camera, a consumer or camera manufacturer may be interested in finding out all topics about the camera's screen, the targeted aspect. As we will see in our experiments, current full topic models are ineffective for such targeted analyses. This paper studies this problem and proposes a novel targeted topic model (TTM) to enable focused analyses on any specific aspect of interest. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the TTM.
Shuai Wang 0020, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Geli Fei, Bing Liu 0001, Sherry Emery
KDD2
2016 Mining Aspect-Specific Opinion using a Holistic Lifelong Topic Model
abstract
Aspect-level sentiment analysis or opinion mining consists of several core sub-tasks: aspect extraction, opinion identification, polarity classification, and separation of general and aspect-specific opinions. Various topic models have been proposed by researchers to address some of these sub-tasks. However, there is little work on modeling all of them together. In this paper, we first propose a holistic fine-grained topic model, called the JAST (Joint Aspect-based Sentiment Topic) model, that can simultaneously model all of above problems under a unified framework. To further improve it, we incorporate the idea of lifelong machine learning and propose a more advanced model, called the LAST (Lifelong Aspect-based Sentiment Topic) model. LAST automatically mines the prior knowledge of aspect, opinion, and their correspondence from other products or domains. Such knowledge is automatically extracted and incorporated into the proposed LAST model without any human involvement. Our experiments using reviews of a large number of product domains show major improvements of the proposed models over state-of-the-art baselines.
Shuai Wang 0020, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001
WWW2
2015 Analyzing and Detecting Opinion Spam on a Large-scale Dataset via Temporal and Spatial Patterns
Huayi Li, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001, Jidong Shao
ICWSM2
2015 Lifelong Machine Learning for Topic Modeling and Beyond
abstract
Machine learning has been popularly used in numerous natural language processing tasks.However, most machine learning models are built using a single dataset.This is often referred to as one-shot learning.Although this one-shot learning paradigm is very useful, it will never make an NLP system understand the natural language because it does not accumulate knowledge learned in the past and make use of the knowledge in future learning and problem solving.In this thesis proposal, I first present a survey of lifelong machine learning (LML).I then narrow down to one specific NLP task, i.e., topic modeling.I propose several approaches to apply lifelong learning idea in topic modeling.Such capability is essential to make an NLP system versatile and holistic.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001
HLT-NAACL1
2015 Learning to Recommend with User Generated Content
Yueshen Xu, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Jianwei Yin, Zizheng Wu, Taojun Yao
WAIM2
2014 Aspect Extraction with Automated Prior Knowledge Learning
abstract
Aspect extraction is an important task in sentiment analysis.Topic modeling is a popular method for the task.However, unsupervised topic models often generate incoherent aspects.To address the issue, several knowledge-based models have been proposed to incorporate prior knowledge provided by the user to guide modeling.In this paper, we take a major step forward and show that in the big data era, without any user input, it is possible to learn prior knowledge automatically from a large amount of review data available on the Web.Such knowledge can then be used by a topic model to discover more coherent aspects.There are two key challenges: (1) learning quality knowledge from reviews of diverse domains, and (2) making the model fault-tolerant to handle possibly wrong knowledge.A novel approach is proposed to solve these problems.Experimental results using reviews from 36 domains show that the proposed approach achieves significant improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001
ACL (1)1
2014 Review Topic Discovery with Phrases using the Pólya Urn Model
Geli Fei, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001
COLING2
2014 Spotting Fake Reviews via Collective Positive-Unlabeled Learning
abstract
Online reviews have become an increasingly important resource for decision making and product designing. But reviews systems are often targeted by opinion spamming. Although fake review detection has been studied by researchers for years using supervised learning, ground truth of large scale datasets is still unavailable and most of existing approaches of supervised learning are based on pseudo fake reviews rather than real fake reviews. Working with Dianping, the largest Chinese review hosting site, we present the first reported work on fake review detection in Chinese with filtered reviews from Dianping's fake review detection system. Dianping's algorithm has a very high precision, but the recall is hard to know. This means that all fake reviews detected by the system are almost certainly fake but the remaining reviews (unknown set) may not be all genuine. Since the unknown set may contain many fake reviews, it is more appropriate to treat it as an unlabeled set. This calls for the model of learning from positive and unlabeled examples (PU learning). By leveraging the intricate dependencies among reviews, users and IP addresses, we first propose a collective classification algorithm called Multi-typed Heterogeneous Collective Classification (MHCC) and then extend it to Collective Positive and Unlabeled learning (CPU). Our experiments are conducted on real-life reviews of 500 restaurants in Shanghai, China. Results show that our proposed models can markedly improve the F1 scores of strong baselines in both PU and non-PU learning settings. Since our models only use language independent features, they can be easily generalized to other languages.
Huayi Li, Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001, Xiaokai Wei, Jidong Shao
ICDM2
2014 Topic Modeling using Topics from Many Domains, Lifelong Learning and Big Data
abstract
Topic modeling has been commonly used to discover topics from document collections. However, unsupervised models can generate many incoherent topics. To address this problem, several knowledge-based topic models have been proposed to incorporate prior domain knowledge from the user. This work advances this research much further and shows that without any user input, we can mine the prior knowledge automatically and dynamically from topics already found from a large number of domains. This paper first proposes a novel method to mine such prior knowledge dynamically in the modeling process, and then a new topic model to use the knowledge to guide the model inference. What is also interesting is that this approach offers a novel lifelong learning algorithm for topic discovery, which exploits the big (past) data and knowledge gained from such data for subsequent modeling. Our experimental results using product reviews from 50 domains demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001
ICML1
2014 Mining topics in documents: standing on the shoulders of big data
abstract
Topic modeling has been widely used to mine topics from documents. However, a key weakness of topic modeling is that it needs a large amount of data (e.g., thousands of documents) to provide reliable statistics to generate coherent topics. However, in practice, many document collections do not have so many documents. Given a small number of documents, the classic topic model LDA generates very poor topics. Even with a large volume of data, unsupervised learning of topic models can still produce unsatisfactory results. In recently years, knowledge-based topic models have been proposed, which ask human users to provide some prior domain knowledge to guide the model to produce better topics. Our research takes a radically different approach. We propose to learn as humans do, i.e., retaining the results learned in the past and using them to help future learning. When faced with a new task, we first mine some reliable (prior) knowledge from the past learning/modeling results and then use it to guide the model inference to generate more coherent topics. This approach is possible because of the big data readily available on the Web. The proposed algorithm mines two forms of knowledge: must-link (meaning that two words should be in the same topic) and cannot-link (meaning that two words should not be in the same topic). It also deals with two problems of the automatically mined knowledge, i.e., wrong knowledge and knowledge transitivity. Experimental results using review documents from 100 product domains show that the proposed approach makes dramatic improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001
KDD1
2013 Discovering coherent topics using general knowledge
abstract
Topic models have been widely used to discover latent topics in text documents. However, they may produce topics that are not interpretable for an application. Researchers have proposed to incorporate prior domain knowledge into topic models to help produce coherent topics. The knowledge used in existing models is typically domain dependent and assumed to be correct. However, one key weakness of this knowledge-based approach is that it requires the user to know the domain very well and to be able to provide knowledge suitable for the domain, which is not always the case because in most real-life applications, the user wants to find what they do not know. In this paper, we propose a framework to leverage the general knowledge in topic models. Such knowledge is domain independent. Specifically, we use one form of general knowledge, i.e., lexical semantic relations of words such as synonyms, antonyms and adjective attributes, to help produce more coherent topics. However, there is a major obstacle, i.e., a word can have multiple meanings/senses and each meaning often has a different set of synonyms and antonyms. Not every meaning is suitable or correct for a domain. Wrong knowledge can result in poor quality topics. To deal with wrong knowledge, we propose a new model, called GK-LDA, which is able to effectively exploit the knowledge of lexical relations in dictionaries. To the best of our knowledge, GK-LDA is the first such model that can incorporate the domain independent knowledge. Our experiments using online product reviews show that GK-LDA performs significantly better than existing state-of-the-art models.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001, Meichun Hsu, Malú Castellanos, Riddhiman Ghosh
CIKM1
2013 Exploiting Domain Knowledge in Aspect Extraction
abstract
Aspect extraction is one of the key tasks in sentiment analysis.In recent years, statistical models have been used for the task.However, such models without any domain knowledge often produce aspects that are not interpretable in applications.To tackle the issue, some knowledge-based topic models have been proposed, which allow the user to input some prior domain knowledge to generate coherent aspects.However, existing knowledge-based topic models have several major shortcomings, e.g., little work has been done to incorporate the cannot-link type of knowledge or to automatically adjust the number of topics based on domain knowledge.This paper proposes a more advanced topic model, called MC-LDA (LDA with m-set and c-set), to address these problems, which is based on an Extended generalized Pólya urn (E-GPU) model (which is also proposed in this paper).Experiments on real-life product reviews from a variety of domains show that MC-LDA outperforms the existing state-of-the-art models markedly.
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001, Meichun Hsu, Malú Castellanos, Riddhiman Ghosh
EMNLP1
2013 Leveraging Multi-Domain Prior Knowledge in Topic Models
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu 0001, Meichun Hsu, Malú Castellanos, Riddhiman Ghosh
IJCAI1
2013 Identifying Intention Posts in Discussion Forums
Zhiyuan Chen 0001, Bing Liu 0001, Meichun Hsu, Malú Castellanos, Riddhiman Ghosh
HLT-NAACL1