Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Hong 0009
dblp:h/JunHong9
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
0000-0002-7816-4107ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Guided programming and automated error analysis in an intelligent Prolog tutor · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004 |
Programming languages and type systems
logic programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Guided programming and automated error analysis in an intelligent Prolog tutor · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automated error analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Guided programming and automated error analysis in an intelligent Prolog tutor
Jun Hong 0009 |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 2001 | Goal Recognition through Goal Graph AnalysisabstractWe present a novel approach to goal recognition based on a two-stage paradigm of graph construction and analysis. First, a graph structure called a Goal Graph is constructed to represent the observed actions, the state of the world, and the achieved goals as well as various connections between these nodes at consecutive time steps. Then, the Goal Graph is analysed at each time step to recognise those partially or fully achieved goals that are consistent with the actions observed so far. The Goal Graph analysis also reveals valid plans for the recognised goals or part of these goals. Our approach to goal recognition does not need a plan library. It does not suffer from the problems in the acquisition and hand-coding of large plan libraries, neither does it have the problems in searching the plan space of exponential size. We describe two algorithms for Goal Graph construction and analysis in this paradigm. These algorithms are both provably sound, polynomial-time, and polynomial-space. The number of goals recognised by our algorithms is usually very small after a sequence of observed actions has been processed. Thus the sequence of observed actions is well explained by the recognised goals with little ambiguity. We have evaluated these algorithms in the UNIX domain, in which excellent performance has been achieved in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and scalability. Jun Hong 0009 |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2000 | Plan Recognition through Goal Graph Analysis
Jun Hong 0009 |
ECAI | 1 |
| 1998 | Tutoring Prolog Novices Based on Programming Techniques
Jun Hong 0009 |
Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |