Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dennis F. Kibler

dblp:k/DennisFKibler · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
29ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 23 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 24% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 60% Performance modeling and evaluation · 40%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.012002
Distribution patterns of over-represented k-mers in non-coding yeast DNA · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element
regulatory element analysis
0.012002
Distribution patterns of over-represented k-mers in non-coding yeast DNA · Bioinform. 2002
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based explanation
0.021997
Learning Symbolic Prototypes · ICML 1997
Learning Prototypical Concept Descriptions · ICML 1995
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.021997
Learning Symbolic Prototypes · ICML 1997
Learning Prototypical Concept Descriptions · ICML 1995
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
prototype learning
0.021997
Learning Symbolic Prototypes · ICML 1997
Learning Prototypical Concept Descriptions · ICML 1995
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
regulatory motif discovery
0.012000
Combinatorial motif analysis and hypothesis generation on a genomic scale · Bioinform. 2000
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
motif discovery
0.011999
Detecting Motifs from Sequences · ICML 1999
Data mining
pattern mining
0.011999
Detecting Motifs from Sequences · ICML 1999
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.011993
Concept Sharing: A Means to Improve Multi-Concept Learning · ICML 1993
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
0.011992
Learning Episodes for Optimization · ML 1992
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012000
Combinatorial motif analysis and hypothesis generation on a genomic scale · Bioinform. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel computing
0.012000
Analysis of Yeast's ORF Upstream Regions by Parallel Processing, Microarrays, and Computational Methods · ISMB 2000
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011991
SteppingStone: An Empirical and Analytical Evaluation · AAAI 1991
Algorithms and data structures › computational biology
sequence analysis
0.011999
Detecting Motifs from Sequences · ICML 1999
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
0.011989
Learning Subgoal Sequences for Planning · IJCAI 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › machine learning for planning
subgoal learning
0.011989
Learning Subgoal Sequences for Planning · IJCAI 1989
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
episodic learning
0.011983
Episodic Learning · AAAI 1983
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.011983
Perturbation: A Means for Guiding Generalization · IJCAI 1983
Programming languages and type systems
logic programming
0.011983
AND Parallelism in Logic Programs · IJCAI 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

computational methods · 0.1statistical background model · 0.0data mining · 0.0stochastic iterative sampling · 0.0microarrays · 0.0microarray · 0.0inductive learning · 0.0constructive induction · 0.0reinforcement learning · 0.0empirical evaluation · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0perturbation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Using hexamers to predict cis-regulatory motifs in Drosophila
abstract
BACKGROUND: Cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) are short stretches of DNA that help regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. They have been found up to 1 megabase away from the genes they regulate and can be located upstream, downstream, and even within their target genes. Due to the difficulty of finding CRMs using biological and computational techniques, even well-studied regulatory systems may contain CRMs that have not yet been discovered. RESULTS: We present a simple, efficient method (HexDiff) based only on hexamer frequencies of known CRMs and non-CRM sequence to predict novel CRMs in regulatory systems. On a data set of 16 gap and pair-rule genes containing 52 known CRMs, predictions made by HexDiff had a higher correlation with the known CRMs than several existing CRM prediction algorithms: Ahab, Cluster Buster, MSCAN, MCAST, and LWF. After combining the results of the different algorithms, 10 putative CRMs were identified and are strong candidates for future study. The hexamers used by HexDiff to distinguish between CRMs and non-CRM sequence were also analyzed and were shown to be enriched in regulatory elements. CONCLUSION: HexDiff provides an efficient and effective means for finding new CRMs based on known CRMs, rather than known binding sites.
Bob Y. Chan, Dennis F. Kibler
BMC Bioinform.2
2002 Distribution patterns of over-represented k-mers in non-coding yeast DNA
abstract
MOTIVATION: Over-represented k-mers in genomic DNA regions are often of particular biological interest. For example, over-represented k-mers in co-regulated families of genes are associated with the DNA binding sites of transcription factors. To measure over-representation, we introduce a statistical background model based on single-mismatches, and apply it to the pooled 500 bp ORF Upstream Regions (USRs) of yeast. More importantly, we investigate the context and spatial distribution of over-represented k-mers in yeast USRs. RESULTS: Single and double-stranded spatial distributions of most over-represented k-mers are highly non-random, and predominantly cluster into a small number of classes that are robust with respect to over-representation measures. Specifically, we show that the three most common distribution patterns can be related to DNA structure, function, and evolution and correspond to: (a) homologous ORF clusters associated with sharply localized distributions; (b) regulatory elements associated with a symmetric broad hill-shaped distribution in the 50-200 bp USR; and (c) runs of As, Ts, and ATs associated with a broad hill-shaped distribution also in the 50-200 bp USR, with extreme structural properties. Analysis of over-representation, homology, localization, and DNA structure are essential components of a general data-mining approach to finding biologically important k-mers in raw genomic DNA and understanding the 'lexicon' of regulatory regions.
Steven E. Hampson, Dennis F. Kibler, Pierre Baldi
Bioinform.2
2000 Analysis of Yeast's ORF Upstream Regions by Parallel Processing, Microarrays, and Computational Methods
Steven E. Hampson, Pierre Baldi, Dennis F. Kibler, Suzanne B. Sandmeyer
ISMB3
2000 Combinatorial motif analysis and hypothesis generation on a genomic scale
abstract
MOTIVATION: Computer-assisted methods are essential for the analysis of biosequences. Gene activity is regulated in part by the binding of regulatory molecules (transcription factors) to combinations of short motifs. The goal of our analysis is the development of algorithms to identify regulatory motifs and to predict the activity of combinations of those motifs. APPROACH: Our research begins with a new motif-finding method, using multiple objective functions and an improved stochastic iterative sampling strategy. Combinatorial motif analysis is accomplished by constructive induction that analyzes potential motif combinations. The hypothesis is generated by applying standard inductive learning algorithms. RESULTS: Tests using 10 previously identified regulons from budding yeast and 14 artificial families of sequences demonstrated the effectiveness of the new motif-finding method. Motif combination and classification approaches were used in the analysis of a sample DNA array data set derived from genome-wide gene expression analysis. AVAILABILITY: Programs will be available as executable files upon request. CONTACT: [email protected] [email protected]
Yuh-Jyh Hu, Suzanne B. Sandmeyer, Calvin McLaughlin, Dennis F. Kibler
Bioinform.4
1999 Detecting Motifs from Sequences
Yuh-Jyh Hu, Suzanne B. Sandmeyer, Dennis F. Kibler
ICML3
1999 Paul R. Cohen's Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence
Dennis F. Kibler
Artif. Intell.1
1999 Minimum Generalization Via Reflection: A Fast Linear Threshold Learner
Steven E. Hampson, Dennis F. Kibler
Mach. Learn.2
1997 Learning Symbolic Prototypes
Piew Datta, Dennis F. Kibler
ICML2
1995 Learning Prototypical Concept Descriptions
Piew Datta, Dennis F. Kibler
ICML2
1993 Concept Sharing: A Means to Improve Multi-Concept Learning
Piew Datta, Dennis F. Kibler
ICML2
1993 Learning Steppingstones for Problem Solving
abstract
One goal of Artificial Intelligence is to develop and understand computational mechanisms for solving difficult real-world problems. Unfortunately, domains traditionally used in general problem-solving research lack important characteristics of real-world domains, making it difficult to apply the techniques developed. Most classic AI domains require satisfying a set of Boolean constraints. Real-world problems require finding a solution that meets a set of Boolean constraints and performs well on a set of real-valued constraints. In addition, most classic domains are static while domains from the real world change. In this paper we demonstrate that SteppingStone, a general learning problem solver, is capable of solving problems with these characteristics. SteppingStone heuristically decomposes a problem into simpler subproblems, and then learns to deal with the interactions that arise between the subproblems. In lieu of an agreed upon metric for problem difficulty, we choose significant problems that are difficult for both people and programs as good candidates for evaluating progress. Consequently we adopt the domain of logic synthesis from VLSI design to demonstrate SteppingStone’s capabilities.
David Ruby, Dennis F. Kibler
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.2
1992 Learning Episodes for Optimization
David Ruby, Dennis F. Kibler
ML2
1992 The Utility of Knowledge in Inductive Learning
Michael J. Pazzani, Dennis F. Kibler
Mach. Learn.2
1991 SteppingStone: An Empirical and Analytical Evaluation
David Ruby, Dennis F. Kibler
AAAI2
1991 Instance-Based Learning Algorithms
David W. Aha, Dennis F. Kibler, Marc K. Albert
Mach. Learn.2
1989 Learning to Plan in Complex Domains
David Rudy, Dennis F. Kibler
ML2
1989 Noise-Tolerant Instance-Based Learning Algorithms
David W. Aha, Dennis F. Kibler
IJCAI2
1989 Learning Subgoal Sequences for Planning
David Ruby, Dennis F. Kibler
IJCAI2
1989 Instance-based prediction of real-valued attributes
abstract
Instance‐based representations have been applied to numerous classification tasks with some success. Most of these applications involved predicting a symbolic class based on observed attributes. This paper presents an instance‐based method for predicting a numeric value based on observed attributes. We prove that, given enough instances, if the numeric values are generated by continuous functions with bounded slope, then the predicted values are accurate approximations of the actual values. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by comparing it with a standard approach for value prediction. The instance‐based approach requires neither ad hoc parameters nor background knowledge.
Dennis F. Kibler, David W. Aha, Marc K. Albert
Comput. Intell.1
1987 The Qualitative Character of Intelligence
abstract
An examination of the character of naturally intelligent systems and artificially intelligent systems yields many qualitative differences. This short essay explores the possibility that these qualitative differences may be the reason for the limitations of current AI systems.
Dennis F. Kibler
ICDE1
1986 Experimental Goal Regression: A Method for Learning Problem-Solving Heuristics
Bruce W. Porter, Dennis F. Kibler
Mach. Learn.2
1985 Parallelism in AI Programs
Dennis F. Kibler, John S. Conery
IJCAI1
1985 A Comparison of Analytic and Experimental Goal Regression for Machine Learning
Bruce W. Porter, Dennis F. Kibler
IJCAI2
1984 Learning Operator Transformations
Bruce W. Porter, Dennis F. Kibler
AAAI2
1983 Episodic Learning
Dennis F. Kibler, Bruce W. Porter
AAAI1
1983 AND Parallelism in Logic Programs
John S. Conery, Dennis F. Kibler
IJCAI2
1983 Perturbation: A Means for Guiding Generalization
Dennis F. Kibler, Bruce W. Porter
IJCAI1
1981 Don't Be Stupid
Dennis F. Kibler, Paul Morris
IJCAI1
1976 A Theory of Nonuniformly Digitized Binary Pictures
abstract
We develop a theory for the analysis of binary-valued digital pictures, particularly blobs and arcs, on a fairly large class of nonuniform as well as uniform mosaics. These so-called "acute mosaics" can represent a wide variety of schemes for digitizing images in machine vision systems. These mosaics can also represent a variety of retinas in human and animal visual systems. We prove the existence of minimum-perimeter-polygon (MPP) representations of digitized blobs on arbitrary mosaics and the uniqueness of MPP's in acute mosaics. We introduce the concept of "relative convexity," and show its relation to the MPP. We show that the MPP reflects the concavities of the digitized blob. We describe and prove the validity of simple tests for cellular convexity and cellular straightness. We present and prove the validity of an algorithm for computing the MPP of so-called "normal complexes" (a broad class of digitized blobs) on an acute mosaic.
Jack Sklansky, Dennis F. Kibler
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.2