Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Udo W. Lipeck
dblp:l/UdoWLipeck · also Udo Walter Lipeck
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Database theory · 66% Query processing and optimization · 31% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 4% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Database theory
integrity constraints |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Deriving Integrity Maintaining Triggers from Transition Graphs · ICDE 1993 Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986 |
Database theory
database schema |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986 |
Database theory › database update
dynamic constraints |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Specification, Semantics, and Enforcement of Dynamic Database Constraints · VLDB 1984 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction specification |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transition graphs · 0.0temporal logic · 0.0pre/postcondition transformation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Performance of Querying Temporal Attributes in Object-Relational DatabasesabstractWe evaluate a model for temporal data utilizing the benefits of object-relational database systems (ORDBS). In particular we show how attribute timestamping can be efficiently implemented in state-of-the-art ORDBS. The attribute timestamping concept is based on introducing user-specific types for temporal versions of datatypes. Moreover on the physical level we make use of user-defined index structures; in particular adapted spatial indexes based on generalized search trees are applied. These index structures greatly improve performance of important operators on both valid and bitemporal datatypes and show the effectiveness of this approach. Carsten Kleiner, Udo W. Lipeck |
TIME | 2 |
| 1996 | Deriving Optimized Integrity Monitoring Triggers from Dynamic Integrity Constraints
Michael Gertz 0001, Udo W. Lipeck |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 2 |
| 1993 | Deriving Integrity Maintaining Triggers from Transition GraphsabstractMethods for deriving constraint maintaining triggers from dynamic integrity constraints represented by transition graphs are presented. The methods reduce integrity monitoring to checking changing static conditions according to life cycle situations. Thus, triggers have to be generated from these graphs, which depend not only on the operations that have occurred in a transaction, but also on the situations that have been reached by the objects mentioned in the constraints. The techniques presented work for dynamic constraints and their corresponding transition graphs as well as for simple static constraints. Only passive reactions (rollbacks) to constraint violations are provided by the trigger patterns, but the systematic generation of such patterns should help the database designer in identifying possible active reactions for repairing constraint violations.> Michael Gertz 0001, Udo W. Lipeck |
ICDE | 2 |
| 1992 | Generalized Bottom-Up Query Evaluation
Stefan Brass, Udo W. Lipeck |
EDBT | 2 |
| 1990 | Transformation of Dynamic Integrity Constraints into Transaction Specifications
Udo W. Lipeck |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1988 | Transformation of Dynamic Integrity Constraints into Transaction Specifications
Udo W. Lipeck |
ICDT | 1 |
| 1988 | Construction of Deterministic Transition Graphs from Dynamic Integrity Constraints
Udo W. Lipeck, Dasu Feng |
WG | 1 |
| 1987 | Monitoring dynamic integrity constraints based on temporal logic
Udo W. Lipeck, Gunter Saake |
Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 1986 | Modelling and Manipulating Objects in Geoscientific Databases
Udo W. Lipeck, Karl Neumann |
ER | 1 |
| 1986 | Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database BehaviourabstractThis paper presents a methodology for the stepwise specification of dynamic database behaviour. A conceptual schema is described in three levels: data, objects and transactions. To determine which sequences of database states are “admissible”, integrity constraints on objects are given in temporal logic. Transactions are specified by pre/postconditions to produce “executable” state sequences. In order to guarantee that executable state sequences already become admissible, integrity constraints are completely transformed into additional pre/postconditions. We introduce general rules for these transformations. Thus, schema specifications can be refined and simplified systematically. Udo W. Lipeck |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 1984 | Specification, Semantics, and Enforcement of Dynamic Database Constraints
Hans-Dieter Ehrich, Udo W. Lipeck, Martin Gogolla |
VLDB | 2 |
| 1984 | Algebraic and Operational Semantics of Specifications Allowing Exceptions and Errors
Martin Gogolla, Klaus Drosten, Udo W. Lipeck, Hans-Dieter Ehrich |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 1983 | Algebraic Domain Equations
Hans-Dieter Ehrich, Udo W. Lipeck |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |