Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Udo W. Lipeck

dblp:l/UdoWLipeck · also Udo Walter Lipeck · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Database theory · 66% Query processing and optimization · 31% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 4%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database theory
integrity constraints
0.021993
Deriving Integrity Maintaining Triggers from Transition Graphs · ICDE 1993
Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986
Database theory
database schema
0.011986
Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986
Database theory › database update
dynamic constraints
0.011984
Specification, Semantics, and Enforcement of Dynamic Database Constraints · VLDB 1984
Transaction processing and concurrency control
transaction specification
0.011986
Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour · SIGMOD Conference 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transition graphs · 0.0temporal logic · 0.0pre/postcondition transformation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Performance of Querying Temporal Attributes in Object-Relational Databases
abstract
We evaluate a model for temporal data utilizing the benefits of object-relational database systems (ORDBS). In particular we show how attribute timestamping can be efficiently implemented in state-of-the-art ORDBS. The attribute timestamping concept is based on introducing user-specific types for temporal versions of datatypes. Moreover on the physical level we make use of user-defined index structures; in particular adapted spatial indexes based on generalized search trees are applied. These index structures greatly improve performance of important operators on both valid and bitemporal datatypes and show the effectiveness of this approach.
Carsten Kleiner, Udo W. Lipeck
TIME2
1996 Deriving Optimized Integrity Monitoring Triggers from Dynamic Integrity Constraints
Michael Gertz 0001, Udo W. Lipeck
Data Knowl. Eng.2
1993 Deriving Integrity Maintaining Triggers from Transition Graphs
abstract
Methods for deriving constraint maintaining triggers from dynamic integrity constraints represented by transition graphs are presented. The methods reduce integrity monitoring to checking changing static conditions according to life cycle situations. Thus, triggers have to be generated from these graphs, which depend not only on the operations that have occurred in a transaction, but also on the situations that have been reached by the objects mentioned in the constraints. The techniques presented work for dynamic constraints and their corresponding transition graphs as well as for simple static constraints. Only passive reactions (rollbacks) to constraint violations are provided by the trigger patterns, but the systematic generation of such patterns should help the database designer in identifying possible active reactions for repairing constraint violations.>
Michael Gertz 0001, Udo W. Lipeck
ICDE2
1992 Generalized Bottom-Up Query Evaluation
Stefan Brass, Udo W. Lipeck
EDBT2
1990 Transformation of Dynamic Integrity Constraints into Transaction Specifications
Udo W. Lipeck
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1988 Transformation of Dynamic Integrity Constraints into Transaction Specifications
Udo W. Lipeck
ICDT1
1988 Construction of Deterministic Transition Graphs from Dynamic Integrity Constraints
Udo W. Lipeck, Dasu Feng
WG1
1987 Monitoring dynamic integrity constraints based on temporal logic
Udo W. Lipeck, Gunter Saake
Inf. Syst.1
1986 Modelling and Manipulating Objects in Geoscientific Databases
Udo W. Lipeck, Karl Neumann
ER1
1986 Stepwise Specification of Dynamic Database Behaviour
abstract
This paper presents a methodology for the stepwise specification of dynamic database behaviour. A conceptual schema is described in three levels: data, objects and transactions. To determine which sequences of database states are “admissible”, integrity constraints on objects are given in temporal logic. Transactions are specified by pre/postconditions to produce “executable” state sequences. In order to guarantee that executable state sequences already become admissible, integrity constraints are completely transformed into additional pre/postconditions. We introduce general rules for these transformations. Thus, schema specifications can be refined and simplified systematically.
Udo W. Lipeck
SIGMOD Conference1
1984 Specification, Semantics, and Enforcement of Dynamic Database Constraints
Hans-Dieter Ehrich, Udo W. Lipeck, Martin Gogolla
VLDB2
1984 Algebraic and Operational Semantics of Specifications Allowing Exceptions and Errors
Martin Gogolla, Klaus Drosten, Udo W. Lipeck, Hans-Dieter Ehrich
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
1983 Algebraic Domain Equations
Hans-Dieter Ehrich, Udo W. Lipeck
Theor. Comput. Sci.2