Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erica Melis

dblp:m/EMelis · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
40ranked-venue papers
17as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 11 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 19 · 6 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 19 · 6 first-authorTheory of computation · 8 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof planning
0.132008
Proof planning with multiple strategies · Artif. Intell. 2008
Knowledge-Based Proof Planning · Artif. Intell. 1999
A Model of Analogy-Driven Proof-Plan Construction · IJCAI 1995
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
theorem proving
0.011999
Knowledge-Based Proof Planning · Artif. Intell. 1999
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
0.011995
A Model of Analogy-Driven Proof-Plan Construction · IJCAI 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

analogy · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Student Behavior in Error-Correction-Tasks and Its Relation to Perception of Competence
Lenka Schnaubert, Eric Andres, Susanne Narciss, Anja Eichelmann, George Goguadze, Erica Melis
EC-TEL6
2010 Learning from Erroneous Examples: When and How Do Students Benefit from Them?
Dimitra Tsovaltzi, Erica Melis, Bruce M. McLaren, Ann-Kristin Meyer, Michael Dietrich, George Goguadze
EC-TEL2
2010 Learning from Erroneous Examples
Dimitra Tsovaltzi, Bruce M. McLaren, Erica Melis, Ann-Kristin Meyer, Michael Dietrich, George Goguadze
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2)3
2009 Combining Evaluative and Generative Diagnosis in ACTIVEMATH
abstract
Generative and evaluative approaches are two different ways of diagnosing students’ input that have been realized in a number of intelligent tutoring systems. We describe how ActiveMath’s exercise subsystem realizes both types of diagnosis and how it can combine them. A framework for distribution of diagnostic services is extending the existing web-service approach to mathematical services with the notion of context. In addition to an appropriate diagnosis, a goal is the interoperability of diagnosis services.
George Goguadze, Erica Melis
AIED2
2009 Effects of Erroneous Examples - Results of a Preliminary School Experiment
Erica Melis, Dieter Kriesell
AIED1
2009 Erroneous Examples: A Preliminary Investigation into Learning Benefits
Dimitra Tsovaltzi, Erica Melis, Bruce M. McLaren, Michael Dietrich, George Goguadze, Ann-Kristin Meyer
EC-TEL2
2009 A New Framework for Dynamic Adaptations and Actions
Carsten Ullrich, Tianxiang Lu, Erica Melis
EC-TEL3
2009 Just-in-Time Adaptivity through Dynamic Items
Carsten Ullrich, Tianxiang Lu, Erica Melis
UMAP3
2009 Pedagogically founded courseware generation based on HTN-planning
Carsten Ullrich, Erica Melis
Expert Syst. Appl.2
2008 An Efficient Student Model Based on Student Performance and Metadata
abstract
This paper describes a new student model technology that combines evidences and knowledge about pedagogical and domain structure. Its structure is generated from the metadata available in the content representation of the adaptive web-based learning platform ACTIVEMATH (or other contents). The evidences are processed with Item Response Theory and Transferable Belief Model uncertainty methodologies. We summarize evaluation results for this student model.
Arndt Faulhaber, Erica Melis
ECAI2
2008 Towards Accessing Disparate Educational Data in a Single, Unified Manner
Erica Melis, Bruce M. McLaren, Silvana Solomon
EC-TEL1
2008 One Exercise - Various Tutorial Strategies
George Goguadze, Erica Melis
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2008 Interoperable Competencies Characterizing Learning Objects in Mathematics
Erica Melis, Arndt Faulhaber, Anja Eichelmann, Susanne Narciss
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
2008 Proof planning with multiple strategies
Erica Melis, Andreas Meier 0002, Jörg H. Siekmann
Artif. Intell.1
2006 Integrating Learning Object Repositories Using a Mediator Architecture
Philipp Kärger, Carsten Ullrich, Erica Melis
EC-TEL3
2006 LeActiveMath
Erica Melis, Jeff Haywood, Tim J. Smith
EC-TEL1
2006 Querying Heterogeneous and Distributed Learning Object Repositories via Ontology-Based Mediation
abstract
1We propose a mediator architecture that allows a learning system to retrieve learning objects (LOs) from heterogeneous repositories of LOs and not exclusively from its proprietary repository. A mediating component accepts queries formulated in a uniform query language, translates them into repository specific queries and passes them to each connected repository. For the translation of queries, an ontology-based queryrewriting method has been developed which uses the specified knowledge representation of the repository and an ontology mapping to compute the rewriting steps for translating. For distributing queries we realized a mediating architecture, which passes the translated queries to the repositories. This architecture has been integrated in the Web-based, user-adaptive and interactive e-learning environment Active Math.
Philipp Kärger, Erica Melis, Carsten Ullrich
ICALT2
2006 Combining ITS and eLearning Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges
Christopher Brooks 0001, Jim E. Greer, Erica Melis, Carsten Ullrich
Intelligent Tutoring Systems3
2005 Design of Erroneous Examples for ACTIVEMATH
Erica Melis
AIED1
2005 System Description: Multi A Multi-strategy Proof Planner
Andreas Meier 0002, Erica Melis
CADE2
2005 Interactivity of Exercises in ActiveMath
George Goguadze, Alberto González Palomo, Erica Melis
ICCE3
2004 Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-learning p
Lora Aroyo, Darina Dicheva, Peter Brusilovsky, Paloma Díaz 0001, Vania Dimitrova, Erik Duval, Jim E. Greer, Tsukasa Hirashima, H. Ulrich Hoppe, Geert-Jan Houben, Mitsuru Ikeda, Judy Kay, Kinshuk, Erica Melis, Antonija Mitrovic, Ambjörn Naeve, Ossi Nykänen, Gilbert Paquette, Symeon Retalis, Demetrios G. Sampson, Katherine M. Sinitsa, Amy Soller, Steffen Staab, Julita Vassileva, M. Felisa Verdejo, Gerd Wagner 0001
Intelligent Tutoring Systems14
2004 Towards Adaptive Generation of Faded Examples
Erica Melis, George Goguadze
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
2004 Constraint Solving for Proof Planning
Jürgen Zimmer, Erica Melis
J. Autom. Reason.2
2002 Proof Development with OMEGA
Jörg H. Siekmann, Christoph Benzmüller, Vladimir Brezhnev, Lassaad Cheikhrouhou, Armin Fiedler, Andreas Franke 0001, Helmut Horacek, Michael Kohlhase, Andreas Meier 0002, Erica Melis, Markus Moschner, Immanuel Normann, Martin Pollet, Volker Sorge, Carsten Ullrich, Claus-Peter Wirth, Jürgen Zimmer
CADE10
2002 Using Computer Algebra Systems as Cognitive Tools
Jochen Büdenbender, Adrian Frischauf, George Goguadze, Erica Melis, Paul Libbrecht, Carsten Ullrich
Intelligent Tutoring Systems4
2000 Workshop: Automated Deduction in Education
Erica Melis
CADE1
2000 Extensions of Constraint Solving for Proof Planning
Erica Melis, Jürgen Zimmer, Tobias Müller 0002
ECAI1
1999 Flexibly Interleaving Processes
Erica Melis, Carsten Ullrich
ICCBR1
1999 Knowledge-Based Proof Planning
Erica Melis, Jörg H. Siekmann
Artif. Intell.1
1999 L<Omega>UI: Lovely <Omega>MEGA User Interface
abstract
Abstract. The capabilities of a automated theorem prover's interface are essential for the effective use of (interactive) proof systems. L Ω UI is the multi-modal interface that combines several features: a graphical display of information in a proof graph, a selective term browser with hypertext facilities, proof and proof plan presentation in natural language, and an editor for adding and maintaining the knowledge base. L Ω UI is realized in an agent-based client-server architecture and implemented in the concurrent constraint programming language Oz.
Jörg H. Siekmann, Stephan M. Hess, Christoph Benzmüller, Lassaad Cheikhrouhou, Armin Fiedler, Helmut Horacek, Michael Kohlhase, Karsten Konrad, Andreas Meier 0002, Erica Melis, Martin Pollet, Volker Sorge
Formal Aspects Comput.10
1999 Analogy in Inductive Theorem Proving
Erica Melis, Jon Whittle 0001
J. Autom. Reason.1
1998 AI-Techniques in Proof Planning
Erica Melis
ECAI1
1998 The Heine-Borel Challenge Problem. In Honor of Woody Bledsoe
Erica Melis
J. Autom. Reason.1
1997 Omega: Towards a Mathematical Assistant
Christoph Benzmüller, Lassaad Cheikhrouhou, Detlef Fehrer, Armin Fiedler, Manfred Kerber, Michael Kohlhase, Karsten Konrad, Andreas Meier 0002, Erica Melis, Wolf Schaarschmidt, Jörg H. Siekmann, Volker Sorge
CADE10
1997 Solution-Relevant Abstractions Constrain Retrieval and Adaptation
Erica Melis
ICCBR1
1996 Internal Analogy in Theorem Proving
Erica Melis, Jon Whittle 0001
CADE1
1995 A Model of Analogy-Driven Proof-Plan Construction
Erica Melis
IJCAI1
1994 Omega-MKRP: A Proof Development Environment
Manfred Kerber, Michael Kohlhase, Erica Melis, Daniel Nesmith, Jörn Richts, Jörg H. Siekmann
CADE4
1994 KEIM: A Toolkit for Automated Deduction
Manfred Kerber, Michael Kohlhase, Erica Melis, Daniel Nesmith, Jörn Richts, Jörg H. Siekmann
CADE4